I wouldn't equate S anything to f anything, you lose too much when you throw the Y away as far as I'm concerned.
Im quite invested for sure Tom...sorry if it doesnt come off that way..there is a way to put up or shut up sorta speak,...care enough about the plant they are growing to put their time and money and brain, where their mouth is.
phenom is like what a baseball player, what is phenom? Where did you get that word, you mean phenotype right? There is no such thing as a stable environment (enviro? pull your fucking baggy pants up!) environment always changes. Our job, is to find genotypes thate produce outstanding phenotypes in a broad range of enviroments, right? So just say that, let's give it the fucking respect it deserves shall we? That graph you posted, this is mendelian genetics, it is the bain of my existance, it's like the fork, but you haven't even looked at the pie you're fixin to eat. It means almost nothing as genetics pertain to drug cannabis. While it is true that all genetic theories are based on and revolve around mendelian genetics, they serve more to confuse than anything else it seems.
Dave I was speaking to GMT re allard but there is a passage ther that is relevant to this last post. Selfing is approxately 3times more intensive than full sib mating, being that there arer no extra bonus point for going slow (after all, we are not slow cooking tritip) there is zero justification other than hebi jeebi's you can't explain, to stick to M/f selection methods.
phenom is like what a baseball player, what is phenom? Where did you get that word, you mean phenotype right? There is no such thing as a stable environment (enviro? pull your fucking baggy pants up!) environment always changes. Our job, is to find genotypes thate produce outstanding phenotypes in a broad range of enviroments, right? So just say that, let's give it the fucking respect it deserves shall we? That graph you posted, this is mendelian genetics, it is the bain of my existance, it's like the fork, but you haven't even looked at the pie you're fixin to eat. It means almost nothing as genetics pertain to drug cannabis. While it is true that all genetic theories are based on and revolve around mendelian genetics, they serve more to confuse than anything else it seems.
I am afraid your approach of f1f2f3 makes no sense to me, I can't even follow it, and it helps to explain why you came down on me previously. If you ever are genuinely interested in the science, feel free to ask a question in a form that is not rez stoner babble (I am sorry, but with ix this and that this is what I see). Better yet, read these two books, they are my two favorites as far as us getting on the same page. The first is one you'd have in a typical college course of plant genetics, the second is more advanced and one that is targeted towards post grad students and breeders in the field. And those folks/books you mentioned, would do well to absorb them too. http://www.amazon.com/Principles-Plant-Breeding-Robert-Allard/dp/0471023094 http://www.amazon.com/Selection-Met...4348458&sr=8-1&keywords=selection+methods+bos I will take great pleasure in having conversations with anybody who takes the time to care enough about the plant they are growing to put their time and money and brain, where their mouth is.