T
TrichyTrichy
I know,right
but their 'hearts' are in the right place. Message gets a little fuzzy...
but their 'hearts' are in the right place. Message gets a little fuzzy...
By the way,someone back asked a good question TOM<
How is the pollen donation from a STS'd female differ from a stressed female non?
ANd i am learning thanX TOM!!
im just scared of HERM kinda pollen being used,if STS pollen is just plain reversed
NO WORRIES RIGHT!
sorry for the ranting been a bad month...
haha that's very debatable. he didn't and doesn't give a fuck for preservation, sales yeah probably!
I totally agree with that statement, this is a cross between Bubblegum (inbred) and Deep Chunk (inbred).
Pheno 9
View Image
Pheno 5
View Image
Pheno 1
View Image
Intersex plants have genes that activate hormones that reverse the plants sex in response to environmental ques.
We can choose to reverse any plant by using STS which inhibits ethylene production. So these plants don't have to be hermies to induce a male phenotype.
STS isn't a stress and doesn't mean the plant can reverse sex on its own.
congrats now this thread is 100 pages of pretentious bullshit.and even more surely, aggressive, diarrhea of the mouth.anyone who puts greater importance on preserving mediocre plant genetics than on being a decent, respectful human being has got their priorities a bit screwed up in my opinion.And it's all just verbal masturbation anyway,It's way way less about educating anyone or preserving anything than it is about screaming "look at me" "listen to me". sad really,how some people are so desperate for validation of themselves and attention that they go through such pain staking lengths to get a morsel of it.
Jane you ignorant sluts,,, - you still don't get it, some of you never will. This was never about me. Do you have any idea how many times we (GitT, Kopite, etc etc) have had these same conversations only to watch them blowing off in the wind like so many tumbleweeds? Oh, we've tried nice believe you me, it doesn't work, it's unreliable, you won't read it. Here's what we can rely on,,,, many of you are a bunch of fucking drama queens. And here was yet another opportunity to get both buyers and breeders in the same room. So if we have to stand up here and call each other douches to get you to furiously masterbate (as someone put it) to the thread, then that is what I reckon needs to be done from time to time for the sake of cannabis, and haha, you read it. The only thing sad about it, is the little you seemed to have taken away from it, but like I said, some of you never will. -Tom
Clueless, clueless, clueless posters. Thanks for your contribution mister president.
I cannot fathom how George Bush came to his conclusions.
Everyone knows the exact same amount about cannabis folks. Don't buy Robert Clarke's new book. He doesn't know more than the noob posters here.
No reason for new growers to come to this forum to get answers from seasoned growers with experience. We all know the same amount. Pee on your plants, it'll give them nitrogen!
I was talking to farmers 1,000 years ago about the MADC markers. They were well informed.
Clueless, clueless, clueless posters. Thanks for your contribution mister president.
I make seeds, I try to breed, I have published research in the Journal of Psychopharmacology.
Here's my fantasy land.
[URL=https://www.icmag.com/ic/picture.php?albumid=39432&pictureid=1053240&thumb=1]View Image[/url]
I'm so fake guys! My journal was only ranked 111 out of 244 in Neurosciences; 76 out of 261 in Pharmacology & Pharmacy; and 40 out of 130 in Psychiatry, 59 out of 192 in Clinical Neurology. Maybe if it ways ranked higher I could be a REAL scientist.