Covid 19 mrna Vaccines...Yes/No?
- Thread starter gaiusmarius
- Start date
Absolem
Active member
RFK Jr in his own words like you asked.
https://thegnmsolution.com/bill-gate...ccine-records/
Bill Gates is developing injectable chip to store vaccine record
Robert F Kennedy jr
A New York Times reporter asked me yesterday about the “conspiracy theory” that #BillGates is developing injectable chip to store vaccine records. Here are the facts:
The Bill and Melinda #GatesFoundation invested more than $21 million to perfect a “microneedle technology” that embeds, under the skin, a vaccination record visible by infrared light that can be read by a “minimally-adopted smartphone technology.” The technology will allow health officials to scan U.S. citizens to detect their vaccination compliance.
A study funded by the Bill and Melinda #Gates Foundation and published in December 2019 by researchers from MIT, the Institute of Chemistry of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Gates-funded Intellectual Ventures Laboratory in Bellevue, WA, describes how “near-infrared quantum dots” will be implanted under the skin along with a vaccine to encode information for “decentralized data storage and bio-sensing.” Gates’ technology uses a tattoo-like mechanism to inject invisible nanoparticles subcutaneously. Gates’ researchers are now testing the implant with a vaccine against the #COVID-19 virus.
The Gates-funded report boasts that the chip system will allow “house-to-house” compliance searches to be conducted by government enforcement teams with “minimal training,” and will “open up new avenues for decentralized data storage and biosensing.” The #MIT paper is titled “Biocompatible near-infrared quantum dots delivered to the skin by microneedle patches to record vaccination.” Gates began funding implantable tracking chips and ratio biotechnology in 2011 with a grant to TransDerm Inc. Gates is currently making multiple investments to develop different versions, including grants to Vaxxas Pty Ltd, Micron Biomedical Inc, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Vaxess Technologies Inc.
I urge you to contact Bill Gates on his social media. Gently explain that tagging and tracking humans may appeal to his government cronies in totalitarian China, but those activities are inconsistent with American values and traditions.
5h
Mass vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is irresponsible and unnecessary, says Artsen Collectief (Doctors Collective)
“Denying access to a normal social life based on being unvaccinated leads to medical apartheid”. This is what the Doctors Collective says in response to the cabinet's plans to 'be able to use test certificates on a large scale in the reopening of society'. The Doctors Collective sees serious medical and ethical objections to such a 'vaccination passport' and emphasizes that entering into a medical act, such as vaccination, is always a free and personal consideration.
“Physical integrity and the right to self-determination are fundamental rights. There should be no discriminatory consequences ”. The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 poses no danger to the vast majority of the population. 80 percent of infected people experience no symptoms, 15 percent have mild symptoms and 5 percent go through a serious period of illness. Less than 2 percent requires additional hospital care and 1 in 7 of these people dies (93 percent of the people who die in the Netherlands are older than 70 years and have underlying conditions).
A large number of people have already had contact with the new corona virus and have built up a natural immunity as a result. They do not need to be vaccinated, all the more because the vaccine does not prevent you from infecting others or making you sick. People who have not been vaccinated are therefore not a danger. Mass vaccination against the virus is therefore irresponsible and unnecessary.
Medical objections
Outgoing Minister De Jonge wants to give people with a 'vaccination passport or certificate' 'more freedom' before the summer holidays. They then get access to events, museums, catering or sports, among other things. The plan is also to be able to receive physical education in this way. The Doctors Collectivehas several medical and ethical objections to such a 'vaccination passport'. For example, there is no clear medical substantiation. There is still little scientific data on the extent to which current vaccines protect against infection or virus transmission. The vaccines mainly seem to protect against the development of more serious complaints after contact with the virus. In addition, there is now increasing evidence that current vaccines cannot protect against all mutations of the coronavirus. This means that there are good reasons to think that current vaccines are insufficiently
effective to achieve herd immunity.
There is also insufficient data on the safety of the vaccines. In their assessment, the EMA lists risks that can manifest themselves in the long term. In addition, little is known about the safety in certain populations such as pregnant women, breastfeeding women, people who have previously experienced corona and people with certain underlying diseases or a less effective immune system.
Ethical boundaries are crossed
Introducing a 'vaccination passport' puts pressure on people to undergo treatment for which it is not yet certain that the benefits to their health outweigh the potential medical risks. According to the Doctors Collective, this clearly crosses an ethical boundary. Introducing such a passport will put pressure on people who doubt whether to take the vaccine, as part of their freedom will depend on it. This clearly contradicts the individual right to self-determination, which is a foundation of human rights.
In its advisory report of 14 January last, the Health Council of the Netherlands gives room for companies to refuse people on the basis of a test result or vaccination status. Although the House of Representatives has passed earlier motions (25295, no. 864 and 25295, no. 676) not to allow an indirect vaccination obligation, the scope this advice gives to companies will lead to an indirect vaccination or testing obligation. The Doctors Collective sees a clear ethical boundary being crossed with this too. The House of Representatives should therefore not allow companies and institutions to require vaccination to participate in a normal social and social life. The direction in which the corona measures are now setting
a dangerous precedent where self-determination and the right to the integrity of the body are threatened.
Voluntary vaccination and no health discrimination
The many medical specialists who have already joined the Doctors Collective believe that the decision whether or not to vaccinate against Covid-19 should always be voluntary. Taking a vaccine is a personal choice, with both the advantages and the potential disadvantages for the individual and not for society. It is the task of the doctor to properly inform about the advantages and disadvantages by means of as complete as possible 'informed consent'. On January 27, the Council of Europe also explicitly voted against making the corona vaccine mandatory with resolution 2361. According to the Council of Europe, discrimination between people who do and those who do not get vaccinated is not allowed. Health discrimination must be avoided at all times.
Protecting the vulnerable
The Doctors Collective considers the current policy to be dangerous and advocates a switch to a policy in which healthy people regain their freedom and vulnerable people are offered the best possible protection on a voluntary basis. People with complaints should be asked to stay at home. People without complaints should not be imposed any measures and therefore not have to submit 'proof or passport' to prove their health.
“Denying access to a normal social life based on being unvaccinated leads to medical apartheid”. This is what the Doctors Collective says in response to the cabinet's plans to 'be able to use test certificates on a large scale in the reopening of society'. The Doctors Collective sees serious medical and ethical objections to such a 'vaccination passport' and emphasizes that entering into a medical act, such as vaccination, is always a free and personal consideration.
“Physical integrity and the right to self-determination are fundamental rights. There should be no discriminatory consequences ”. The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 poses no danger to the vast majority of the population. 80 percent of infected people experience no symptoms, 15 percent have mild symptoms and 5 percent go through a serious period of illness. Less than 2 percent requires additional hospital care and 1 in 7 of these people dies (93 percent of the people who die in the Netherlands are older than 70 years and have underlying conditions).
A large number of people have already had contact with the new corona virus and have built up a natural immunity as a result. They do not need to be vaccinated, all the more because the vaccine does not prevent you from infecting others or making you sick. People who have not been vaccinated are therefore not a danger. Mass vaccination against the virus is therefore irresponsible and unnecessary.
Medical objections
Outgoing Minister De Jonge wants to give people with a 'vaccination passport or certificate' 'more freedom' before the summer holidays. They then get access to events, museums, catering or sports, among other things. The plan is also to be able to receive physical education in this way. The Doctors Collectivehas several medical and ethical objections to such a 'vaccination passport'. For example, there is no clear medical substantiation. There is still little scientific data on the extent to which current vaccines protect against infection or virus transmission. The vaccines mainly seem to protect against the development of more serious complaints after contact with the virus. In addition, there is now increasing evidence that current vaccines cannot protect against all mutations of the coronavirus. This means that there are good reasons to think that current vaccines are insufficiently
effective to achieve herd immunity.
There is also insufficient data on the safety of the vaccines. In their assessment, the EMA lists risks that can manifest themselves in the long term. In addition, little is known about the safety in certain populations such as pregnant women, breastfeeding women, people who have previously experienced corona and people with certain underlying diseases or a less effective immune system.
Ethical boundaries are crossed
Introducing a 'vaccination passport' puts pressure on people to undergo treatment for which it is not yet certain that the benefits to their health outweigh the potential medical risks. According to the Doctors Collective, this clearly crosses an ethical boundary. Introducing such a passport will put pressure on people who doubt whether to take the vaccine, as part of their freedom will depend on it. This clearly contradicts the individual right to self-determination, which is a foundation of human rights.
In its advisory report of 14 January last, the Health Council of the Netherlands gives room for companies to refuse people on the basis of a test result or vaccination status. Although the House of Representatives has passed earlier motions (25295, no. 864 and 25295, no. 676) not to allow an indirect vaccination obligation, the scope this advice gives to companies will lead to an indirect vaccination or testing obligation. The Doctors Collective sees a clear ethical boundary being crossed with this too. The House of Representatives should therefore not allow companies and institutions to require vaccination to participate in a normal social and social life. The direction in which the corona measures are now setting
a dangerous precedent where self-determination and the right to the integrity of the body are threatened.
Voluntary vaccination and no health discrimination
The many medical specialists who have already joined the Doctors Collective believe that the decision whether or not to vaccinate against Covid-19 should always be voluntary. Taking a vaccine is a personal choice, with both the advantages and the potential disadvantages for the individual and not for society. It is the task of the doctor to properly inform about the advantages and disadvantages by means of as complete as possible 'informed consent'. On January 27, the Council of Europe also explicitly voted against making the corona vaccine mandatory with resolution 2361. According to the Council of Europe, discrimination between people who do and those who do not get vaccinated is not allowed. Health discrimination must be avoided at all times.
Protecting the vulnerable
The Doctors Collective considers the current policy to be dangerous and advocates a switch to a policy in which healthy people regain their freedom and vulnerable people are offered the best possible protection on a voluntary basis. People with complaints should be asked to stay at home. People without complaints should not be imposed any measures and therefore not have to submit 'proof or passport' to prove their health.
China’s Medisun enters into partnership deal with Mayo Clinic in United States
US hospital Mayo Clinic has entered into a partnership agreement with Chinese healthcare firm Medisun Holdings to collaborate on patient services and regenerative treatment research, a statement posted Monday morning to the stock exchange said.
China’s Huimei Healthcare raises $30M in Series C funding
Originally founded in 2015 as a result of joint venture between Mayo Clinic and Hillhouse Capital, China’s Huimei Healthcare announced last week that it had closed $30M in Series C funding, led by Qiming Ventures and WuXi AppTech.
Harvard Leads U.S. Colleges That Received $1 Billion From China
https://hcf.fas.harvard.edu/
Gavi welcomes US$ 1.5 million contribution from China Merchants Group
The contribution will be disbursed through CMCF in the period of 2017-2019 and will be matched by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through its support to the Gavi Matching Fund.
The Gates Foundation is spending $100 million to fight the coronavirus outbreak. Bill Gates has warned about a pandemic for years.
As the coronavirus outbreak grows, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is giving $100 million in funding for frontline responders, prevention measures, and treatment efforts around the world.
Boston-based Education Research Centers Receive $8.5 Million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Gene-Editing Advance Puts More Gene-Based Cures Within Reach
Caption: The prime editing system (left) contains three parts: two enzymes, Cas9 and reverse transcriptase, and an engineered guide RNA, pegRNA. Unlike regular CRISPR gene editing, prime editing nicks just one strand of the DNA molecule (right) and then uses RNA and reverse transcriptase to direct highly targeted changes to a cell’s DNA. Credit: Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA.
https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The FauciCOVID-19 Dossier.pdf
Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier
David E. Martin 1
The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier
This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.
This work was supported, in part, by a fund-raising effort in which approximately 330 persons contributed funds in support of the New Earth technology team and Urban Global Health Alliance. It is released under a Creative Commons license CC-BY-NC-SA. Any derivative use of this dossier must be made public for the benefit of others. All documents, references and disclosures contained herein are subject to an AS-IS representation. The author does not bear responsibility for errors in the public record or references therein. Throughout this document, uses of terms commonly accepted in medical and scientific literature do not imply acceptance or rejection of the dogma that they represent.
Background: Over the past two decades, my company – M·CAM – has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC). In our 2003-2004 Global Technology Assessment: Vector Weaponization M·CAM highlighted China’s growing involvement in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology with respect to joining the world stage in chimeric construction of viral vectors. Since that time, on a weekly basis, we have monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, but not limited to, the research synergies forming between the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, many other research institutions, and their commercial affiliations.
The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit.1 In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.“Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV) that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.”2On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.
Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier CC-BY-NC-SA Dr. David E. Martin 3 Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia. 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature. This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries. In short, with Baric’s U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC’s ‘852 patent (Claim 1), no research in the United States could be conducted without permission or infringement. We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). In this capacity, he was both responsible for determining “novelty” of clades of virus species but directly benefitted from determining declarations of novelty in the form of new research funding authorizations and associated patenting and commercial collaboration.
Together with CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic and commercial parties (including Johnson & Johnson; Sanofi and their several coronavirus patent holding biotech companies; Moderna; Ridgeback; Gilead; Sherlock Biosciences; and, others), a powerful group of interests constituted what we would suggest are “interlocking directorates” under U.S. anti-trust laws. These entities also were affiliated with the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) whose members were instrumental in the Open Philanthropy-funded global coronavirus pandemic “desk-top” exercise EVENT 201 in October 2019. This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences and linking interlocking funding partner, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation into the GPMB mandate for a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020 alerted us to anticipate an “epidemic” scenario. We expected to see such a scenario emerge from Wuhan or Guangdong China, northern Italy, Seattle, New York or a combination thereof, as Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Baric’s work on zoonotic transmission of coronavirus identified overlapping mutations in coronavirus in bat populations located in these areas. This dossier is by no means exhaustive. It is, however, indicative the numerous criminal violations that may be associated with the COVID-19 terrorism. All source materials are referenced herein. An additional detailed breakdown of all the of individuals, research institutions, foundations, funding sources, and commercial enterprises can be accessed upon request.
https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The FauciCOVID-19 Dossier.pdf
..................
don't believe i would ever trust Harvard, Mayo Clinic, NIH/NIAID, W.H.O. or anyone who does in this case.
US hospital Mayo Clinic has entered into a partnership agreement with Chinese healthcare firm Medisun Holdings to collaborate on patient services and regenerative treatment research, a statement posted Monday morning to the stock exchange said.
China’s Huimei Healthcare raises $30M in Series C funding
Originally founded in 2015 as a result of joint venture between Mayo Clinic and Hillhouse Capital, China’s Huimei Healthcare announced last week that it had closed $30M in Series C funding, led by Qiming Ventures and WuXi AppTech.
Harvard Leads U.S. Colleges That Received $1 Billion From China
https://hcf.fas.harvard.edu/
Gavi welcomes US$ 1.5 million contribution from China Merchants Group
The contribution will be disbursed through CMCF in the period of 2017-2019 and will be matched by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through its support to the Gavi Matching Fund.
The Gates Foundation is spending $100 million to fight the coronavirus outbreak. Bill Gates has warned about a pandemic for years.
As the coronavirus outbreak grows, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is giving $100 million in funding for frontline responders, prevention measures, and treatment efforts around the world.
Boston-based Education Research Centers Receive $8.5 Million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Gene-Editing Advance Puts More Gene-Based Cures Within Reach
Caption: The prime editing system (left) contains three parts: two enzymes, Cas9 and reverse transcriptase, and an engineered guide RNA, pegRNA. Unlike regular CRISPR gene editing, prime editing nicks just one strand of the DNA molecule (right) and then uses RNA and reverse transcriptase to direct highly targeted changes to a cell’s DNA. Credit: Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA.
https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The FauciCOVID-19 Dossier.pdf
Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier
David E. Martin 1
The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier
This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.
This work was supported, in part, by a fund-raising effort in which approximately 330 persons contributed funds in support of the New Earth technology team and Urban Global Health Alliance. It is released under a Creative Commons license CC-BY-NC-SA. Any derivative use of this dossier must be made public for the benefit of others. All documents, references and disclosures contained herein are subject to an AS-IS representation. The author does not bear responsibility for errors in the public record or references therein. Throughout this document, uses of terms commonly accepted in medical and scientific literature do not imply acceptance or rejection of the dogma that they represent.
Background: Over the past two decades, my company – M·CAM – has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC). In our 2003-2004 Global Technology Assessment: Vector Weaponization M·CAM highlighted China’s growing involvement in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology with respect to joining the world stage in chimeric construction of viral vectors. Since that time, on a weekly basis, we have monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, but not limited to, the research synergies forming between the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, many other research institutions, and their commercial affiliations.
The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit.1 In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.“Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV) that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.”2On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.
Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier CC-BY-NC-SA Dr. David E. Martin 3 Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia. 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature. This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries. In short, with Baric’s U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC’s ‘852 patent (Claim 1), no research in the United States could be conducted without permission or infringement. We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). In this capacity, he was both responsible for determining “novelty” of clades of virus species but directly benefitted from determining declarations of novelty in the form of new research funding authorizations and associated patenting and commercial collaboration.
Together with CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic and commercial parties (including Johnson & Johnson; Sanofi and their several coronavirus patent holding biotech companies; Moderna; Ridgeback; Gilead; Sherlock Biosciences; and, others), a powerful group of interests constituted what we would suggest are “interlocking directorates” under U.S. anti-trust laws. These entities also were affiliated with the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) whose members were instrumental in the Open Philanthropy-funded global coronavirus pandemic “desk-top” exercise EVENT 201 in October 2019. This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences and linking interlocking funding partner, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation into the GPMB mandate for a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020 alerted us to anticipate an “epidemic” scenario. We expected to see such a scenario emerge from Wuhan or Guangdong China, northern Italy, Seattle, New York or a combination thereof, as Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Baric’s work on zoonotic transmission of coronavirus identified overlapping mutations in coronavirus in bat populations located in these areas. This dossier is by no means exhaustive. It is, however, indicative the numerous criminal violations that may be associated with the COVID-19 terrorism. All source materials are referenced herein. An additional detailed breakdown of all the of individuals, research institutions, foundations, funding sources, and commercial enterprises can be accessed upon request.
https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The FauciCOVID-19 Dossier.pdf
..................
don't believe i would ever trust Harvard, Mayo Clinic, NIH/NIAID, W.H.O. or anyone who does in this case.
don't believe i would ever trust Harvard, Mayo Clinic, NIH/NIAID, W.H.O. or anyone who does in this case.
[/QUOTE]
Been wondering how long it would be before someone is put before us who says they no longer believe anything from the web. If it is not found in pre-internet published text, then it must be suspect. A relatively small conventional library may be the basis of extravagant wealth in the future.
I never cease to be amazed at the extent of the manipulation behind big pharma and the various "foundations" which are the foundation of our for profit medical system.
No one pours more money over our political representatives than the lobby groups of big pharma.
I believe for profit medicine may be is the most obscene thing that our society has come up with thus far.
[/QUOTE]
Been wondering how long it would be before someone is put before us who says they no longer believe anything from the web. If it is not found in pre-internet published text, then it must be suspect. A relatively small conventional library may be the basis of extravagant wealth in the future.
I never cease to be amazed at the extent of the manipulation behind big pharma and the various "foundations" which are the foundation of our for profit medical system.
No one pours more money over our political representatives than the lobby groups of big pharma.
I believe for profit medicine may be is the most obscene thing that our society has come up with thus far.
for you, but only cause i just stumbled across this on Quora:
so, you got the real-deal-DNA version of a vaccine.
show of hands, please, who even knew about "codon-optimised coding sequence", or, that a software toolkit exists to do the do. getting your own custom DNA/RNA is as simple as an Excel spreadsheet.
to think: 8 million years of evolution got it wrong ... now there is software! We're saved!!! (doomed???)
Last edited:
St. Phatty
Active member
Such BS !
I had a chance to work on interesting things, like the F22 & JSF electronics, the Nokia 2 1/2 G base stations, etc.
If I asked any of my physics-literate co-workers to sketch out a program for the electronic part of something like this, I would get 2 answers -
* How much can we get paid.
* We're going to need serious time to come up with a plausible Powerpoint presentation.
'The War' Marvelous Marvin vs Tommy 'hitman' Hearns
may have 3 of the best middleweight rounds in history.
No glamour,Just one tough SOB
wanted to share this, i know its not proof of anything, but if it's true, it will not be kept quite for long. we already have 4 EU countries stopping astra zenaca due to adverse effects, while the WHO claims there is literally no one who died from the vaccine for covid, lmao. so every case reported all over the world of death after vaccination was just a coincidence. time will tell...
Emergency Room (ER) Sees Surge of Seniors After COVID-19 Vaccination, Says Nurse Whistleblower
https://www.globalresearch.ca/emerg...-vaccination-says-nurse-whistleblower/5738495
The following article is the second in a series of interviews with a nurse who works in a hospital on the outskirts of Toronto, Ontario.
She has provided sufficient evidence, and links to public records, to satisfy me that she is indeed a nurse working for over a decade in multiple Canadian hospitals, serving both in the emergency room and intensive care unit. To protect her identity, position and family, details about her and her place of work have been changed or omitted, without altering her message.
Emergency Room (ER) Sees Surge of Seniors After COVID-19 Vaccination, Says Nurse Whistleblower
https://www.globalresearch.ca/emerg...-vaccination-says-nurse-whistleblower/5738495
The following article is the second in a series of interviews with a nurse who works in a hospital on the outskirts of Toronto, Ontario.
She has provided sufficient evidence, and links to public records, to satisfy me that she is indeed a nurse working for over a decade in multiple Canadian hospitals, serving both in the emergency room and intensive care unit. To protect her identity, position and family, details about her and her place of work have been changed or omitted, without altering her message.
Netherlands is the fifth country who stops for 2 weeks the AstraZeneca vaccine till further research shows if the problems are caused by the vaccine or not.
290.000 people must be notified that they have to wait.
290.000 people must be notified that they have to wait.
10 million Astra jabs in uk - 13 clots
10 million Pfizer jabs in uk- 15 clots
no more than base levels for unvaccinated people.
Only main difference I can see is the Astra one costs £1.80 a jab (non profit), while the Pfizer costs about £9 a jab and makes a profit for the company.
Or maybe that’s just a coincidence.
10 million Pfizer jabs in uk- 15 clots
no more than base levels for unvaccinated people.
Only main difference I can see is the Astra one costs £1.80 a jab (non profit), while the Pfizer costs about £9 a jab and makes a profit for the company.
Or maybe that’s just a coincidence.
Lareb: Ten reports of possible thrombosis after AstraZeneca vaccine
The Lareb side effect center has received ten reports in the Netherlands about the AstraZeneca vaccine, "in which thrombosis or embolism may have played a role".
However, Lareb has not yet received any reports of serious, rare signs of clot formation (thrombosis) in combination with a decreased number of blood platelets (thrombocytopenia) in adults under 50 years of age. Reports of these serious side effects were received in Denmark and Norway. As a result, it was decided to take a temporary break with AstraZeneca injections. "Lareb has not seen any reports with this specific image so far," the organization said.
Also read: Almost 289,000 AstraZeneca injection appointments have to be canceled
The ten reports received by the side effects center are being further investigated. "And where necessary, more information is requested to get the picture more complete".
The Lareb side effect center has received ten reports in the Netherlands about the AstraZeneca vaccine, "in which thrombosis or embolism may have played a role".
However, Lareb has not yet received any reports of serious, rare signs of clot formation (thrombosis) in combination with a decreased number of blood platelets (thrombocytopenia) in adults under 50 years of age. Reports of these serious side effects were received in Denmark and Norway. As a result, it was decided to take a temporary break with AstraZeneca injections. "Lareb has not seen any reports with this specific image so far," the organization said.
Also read: Almost 289,000 AstraZeneca injection appointments have to be canceled
The ten reports received by the side effects center are being further investigated. "And where necessary, more information is requested to get the picture more complete".
ROME - Justice in Italy seizes a batch of AstraZeneca vaccines for investigation into the death of a man.
It is said to be a batch that was used in the northern region of Piedmont. The region suspended use after the death of 57-year-old music teacher Sandro Tognatti. He died on the weekend shortly after he was vaccinated. It has not been clarified why and that is why the judiciary proceeded to the seizure.
l
It is said to be a batch that was used in the northern region of Piedmont. The region suspended use after the death of 57-year-old music teacher Sandro Tognatti. He died on the weekend shortly after he was vaccinated. It has not been clarified why and that is why the judiciary proceeded to the seizure.
l
Backlash As Rich Countries Vaccinate A Person Per Second With Poor Nations Alleging "Vaccine Apartheid"
Sunday, Mar 14, 2021 - 16:30
Authored by Jake Johnson via CommonDreams.org,
The governments of the world's wealthiest countries—including the US, Canada, and the United Kingdom—are facing growing backlash for continuing to block an India and South Africa-led proposal to temporarily waive a restrictive global intellectual property rights agreement, an effort aimed at spurring broad-based production of coronavirus vaccines and getting the shots to poor nations struggling to administer a single dose.
According to Oxfam International, a member of the People's Vaccine Alliance, "rich countries are vaccinating at a rate of one person per second yet are siding with a handful of pharmaceutical corporations in protecting their monopolies against the needs of the majority of developing countries."
Image: Hindustan Times via Getty ImagesOn Thursday—the one-year anniversary of the WHO's official global pandemic declaration—representatives from the U.S. and other wealthy nations teamed up to thwart, once again, the push by more than 100 member nations of the World Trade Organization to suspend certain provisions of the so-called TRIPS Agreement, an intellectual property rights arrangement.
"The proposal was co-sponsored by 57 countries in the trade group and on Thursday support split largely along the lines of the WTO's self-identified developed and developing countries," Law360 reported. "The only developing country to oppose the waiver was Brazil."
Supporters of the waiver argue the prohibitive patent rights that governments have granted to private pharmaceutical companies are standing in the way of the kind of global vaccination campaign needed to stop the spread of a virus that does not respect borders. Fearing the emergence and normalization of "vaccine apartheid," the head of the WHO and others have raised alarm over the fact that more than 100 poor nations have not yet been able to start inoculating their populations.
"It is unforgivable that while people are literally fighting for breath, rich country governments continue to block what could be a vital breakthrough in ending this pandemic for everyone in rich and poor countries alike," Anna Marriott, Oxfam's health policy manager, said in a statement.
"During a pandemic that is devastating lives across the planet," added Marriott, "governments should be using their powers now, not tomorrow, to remove intellectual property rules and ensure pharmaceutical companies work together to share technology and fix raw material shortages, all of which are standing in the way of a massive scale-up in production."
Despite a fierce lobbying campaign by the pharmaceutical industry in the US and elsewhere, support for the India-South Africa proposal has grown since the effort was first tabled in October, with dozens of U.S. members of Congress and more than 100 members of the European Parliament joining a supermajority of WTO member nations in backing the idea. Voicing support for the proposal, one commentator recently called it "an existential threat to the continuing practice of treating medicines as a commodity."
"There is no reason we have to prioritize the profits of pharmaceutical companies over the dignity of people in other countries," U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told the New York Times last week.
In a video released on Wednesday, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) urged President Joe Biden to support the TRIPS waiver, arguing that "ending this pandemic requires collaboration, solidarity, and empathy."
"It is unconscionable," said Sanders, "that amid a global health crisis, huge multibillion dollar pharmaceutical companies continue to prioritize profits by protecting their monopolies and driving up prices rather than prioritizing the lives of people everywhere, including in the Global South."
As the Corporate Europe Observatory reported, "If know-how and vaccine recipes are shared, generic manufacturers could start supplying the countries in the back of the queue, for instance the 85 nations set to receive vaccines only in two years time."
"Had it not been for the stiff resistance by the US, Switzerland, Norway, and not least the E.U., that vision could have become a reality," the organization noted. "But the European Commission has shown no sign of budging at the WTO negotiations. At a meeting in Geneva on 11 March the EU's rejection was reiterated."
With the U.S. facing accusations of vaccine hoarding as it buys up enough supply to inoculate the eligible population twice over—and refuses to donate excess doses to countries pleading for them—Biden on Friday announced an agreement with Japan, India, and Australia to bolster global vaccine production with the stated goal of remedying shortages in Southeast Asia.
As the Times reported, "the Biden administration committed to providing financial support to help Biological E, a major vaccine manufacturer in India, produce at least one billion doses of coronavirus vaccines by the end of 2022."
While viewed as a welcome addition to lagging global vaccination efforts, the deal falls well short of the sweeping recipe-sharing that experts and activists say is required to ensure that no one is denied access to a life-saving shot.
Calling the new agreement a "step in the right direction," Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) said Saturday that Biden must now "take the next step and endorse the TRIPS waiver."
"The waiver is supported by over 100 countries and being opposed by only a handful of rich countries," Schakowsky noted. "The world needs as much vaccine manufacturing capacity as it can get. Time is of the essence."
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/...econd-poor-nations-alleging-vaccine-apartheid
Sunday, Mar 14, 2021 - 16:30
Authored by Jake Johnson via CommonDreams.org,
The governments of the world's wealthiest countries—including the US, Canada, and the United Kingdom—are facing growing backlash for continuing to block an India and South Africa-led proposal to temporarily waive a restrictive global intellectual property rights agreement, an effort aimed at spurring broad-based production of coronavirus vaccines and getting the shots to poor nations struggling to administer a single dose.
According to Oxfam International, a member of the People's Vaccine Alliance, "rich countries are vaccinating at a rate of one person per second yet are siding with a handful of pharmaceutical corporations in protecting their monopolies against the needs of the majority of developing countries."
"The proposal was co-sponsored by 57 countries in the trade group and on Thursday support split largely along the lines of the WTO's self-identified developed and developing countries," Law360 reported. "The only developing country to oppose the waiver was Brazil."
Supporters of the waiver argue the prohibitive patent rights that governments have granted to private pharmaceutical companies are standing in the way of the kind of global vaccination campaign needed to stop the spread of a virus that does not respect borders. Fearing the emergence and normalization of "vaccine apartheid," the head of the WHO and others have raised alarm over the fact that more than 100 poor nations have not yet been able to start inoculating their populations.
"It is unforgivable that while people are literally fighting for breath, rich country governments continue to block what could be a vital breakthrough in ending this pandemic for everyone in rich and poor countries alike," Anna Marriott, Oxfam's health policy manager, said in a statement.
"During a pandemic that is devastating lives across the planet," added Marriott, "governments should be using their powers now, not tomorrow, to remove intellectual property rules and ensure pharmaceutical companies work together to share technology and fix raw material shortages, all of which are standing in the way of a massive scale-up in production."
Despite a fierce lobbying campaign by the pharmaceutical industry in the US and elsewhere, support for the India-South Africa proposal has grown since the effort was first tabled in October, with dozens of U.S. members of Congress and more than 100 members of the European Parliament joining a supermajority of WTO member nations in backing the idea. Voicing support for the proposal, one commentator recently called it "an existential threat to the continuing practice of treating medicines as a commodity."
"There is no reason we have to prioritize the profits of pharmaceutical companies over the dignity of people in other countries," U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told the New York Times last week.
In a video released on Wednesday, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) urged President Joe Biden to support the TRIPS waiver, arguing that "ending this pandemic requires collaboration, solidarity, and empathy."
"It is unconscionable," said Sanders, "that amid a global health crisis, huge multibillion dollar pharmaceutical companies continue to prioritize profits by protecting their monopolies and driving up prices rather than prioritizing the lives of people everywhere, including in the Global South."
As the Corporate Europe Observatory reported, "If know-how and vaccine recipes are shared, generic manufacturers could start supplying the countries in the back of the queue, for instance the 85 nations set to receive vaccines only in two years time."
"Had it not been for the stiff resistance by the US, Switzerland, Norway, and not least the E.U., that vision could have become a reality," the organization noted. "But the European Commission has shown no sign of budging at the WTO negotiations. At a meeting in Geneva on 11 March the EU's rejection was reiterated."
With the U.S. facing accusations of vaccine hoarding as it buys up enough supply to inoculate the eligible population twice over—and refuses to donate excess doses to countries pleading for them—Biden on Friday announced an agreement with Japan, India, and Australia to bolster global vaccine production with the stated goal of remedying shortages in Southeast Asia.
As the Times reported, "the Biden administration committed to providing financial support to help Biological E, a major vaccine manufacturer in India, produce at least one billion doses of coronavirus vaccines by the end of 2022."
While viewed as a welcome addition to lagging global vaccination efforts, the deal falls well short of the sweeping recipe-sharing that experts and activists say is required to ensure that no one is denied access to a life-saving shot.
Calling the new agreement a "step in the right direction," Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) said Saturday that Biden must now "take the next step and endorse the TRIPS waiver."
"The waiver is supported by over 100 countries and being opposed by only a handful of rich countries," Schakowsky noted. "The world needs as much vaccine manufacturing capacity as it can get. Time is of the essence."
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/...econd-poor-nations-alleging-vaccine-apartheid
