It is perfectly alright Thomas that you have noted it here for all to see. I will make sure to differentiate between what is depicted from the WND background and what is my comments in that segment.
My addition to the background is my own understanding of the passage as it relates for me today and clearly, I am sharing just that. Anyone can have the same understanding or maybe a different one which I would welcomed.
In my comment as to "Rely on The Law and not upon person(s)" as far as the Letter context is concern, you absolutely correct and to whom it is refers to. However, in practicing this teaching today, since we are not in the same predicament of trying to choose from other teachers of other sects of Buddhism who are distorting the Lotus Sutra's massage or outwardly abolish the Lotus Sutra, even tough in reality they do exist, in our case, The Lotus Sutra for Nichiren and for us ,as Toda put it, is None other than the Gohonzon of Nam myoho renge- kyo . To rely on Gohonzon and Nam-myoho-renge-kyo does not means we are to ignore a correct teacher. It means that even teachers can lead us astray and our traverse in faith starts in embracing the Gohonzon through chanting NMRK first as Nichiren prescribed.
pb...
It is the Gohonzon of Nam-myoho-renge-kyo that we aught to put in the center of our lives as the object of observing our mind rather than seek salvation from the outer word or from other people. Therefore the entire 28 chapters directed towards this end and therefore, to propagate the Gohonzon for that reason is the "entrustment" of this task given to us today by Nichiren.
(In my opinion ;-)
Thomas,
I think you are jumping into the wrong conclusion. Sensei has been my mentor for 35 years and will be for the rest of my life. You are insinuating a negative connotation to my quotation as if I am referring to Sensei. It is obvious that many teachers will come after Sensei and the criteria and posture by which we to have faith is that no one comes between us and the Gohonzon when it comes to faith. Not even the mentor.
(In my opinion)
Our function as disciples of Nichiren is to lead others to the Gohonzon. This is the function of a mentor as well since a mentor is first and foremost a disciple, then a disciple leads others to the Law as a mentor. This is what we do as disciples. This is what Nichiren did. He declared to be the correct teacher for the Latter day of the Law by revealing what was hidden in the essential Teaching. This is none other than the Gohonzon of Nam-mam myoho--renge-kyo.
(In my opinion)
Therefore, there is no one who can stand up and say I am Nichiren of today, Nikken cannot say it nor any Mentor can say it today. Neither we can consider any Mentor or priest, for that matter, to be Nichiren of today. Therefore when we gaze at the Gohonzon we gaze at the life of Nichiren which is identical to our lives in function as common mortal while diluted and function as Buddhas while enlightened.
(In my opinion)
The reason Nichiren inscribed on the Gohonzon NMRK-Nichiren is precisely because he already fulfilled the advent as the original Buddha in the form of the Gohonzon. Therefore, No one can take his advent once more as Nichiren.
(In my opinion)
I am concern that some people feel that The Mentor, if he is a correct Mentor, can be likened or as if he is Nichiren. This is what I felt or thought for many years that Sensei is or could be. Not until recently! No one was able to answer this question of mine whether he is or not. Not even Sensei. and I asked him. However I heard many comments from senior leaders insinuating that he is in various ways.
So, My question to you. Do you see Sensei as if he is the appearance of Nichiren of today's time?
As I indicated above (in my opinion) No! No one can come and claim that; since Nichiren already appeared. Therefore we are all Nichiren's disciples including the three presidents.
Therefore, (in my opinion) any disciple or a teacher/mentor is bound to Nichiren statements I quoted in my last post regardless of the age. Teachers of The Latter Day of the Law after Nichiren are not exempt from such statements.
(In my opinion) What is good for the Goose is Good for the Gender. means if the warnings are correct in the Former and the Middle day of the Law why is it not correct for the Latter Day of the Law? This is why Nichiren brings these points.
(IN MY OPINION)
pb