What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Blatent election fraud thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

flylowgethigh

Non-growing Lurker
ICMag Donor
Supreme Court Flooded with Filings in Texas Challenge to Voting Procedures

View Image



The Supreme Court has been flooded with filings since Texas launched its case against Pennsylvania and three other states on Monday night, increasing the likelihood that the Court will finally hear a challenge to the 2020 presidential election results.
As Breitbart News was first to report, Texas sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, arguing that they had made changes to their voting process outside their respective state legislatures, which the Constitution says must control the selection of presidential electors. Texas also argued that there were differences in voting procedures within these states, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. And it also argued that there were irregularities that resulted from these violations.
In addition to the original filing by the State of Texas, there are other filings, including:

  • A motion to intervene by President Donald Trump
  • An amici curiae (“friends of the court”) brief by Missouri, on behalf of itself and “Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia” in support of Texas’s case
  • An amici curiae brief filed by Carter Phillips and other “Never Trump” Republican opponents of the president, supporting Pennsylvania and the defendant states
  • An amici curiae brief filed by Roy Moore and other “constitutional attorneys” in support of the Texas case.
  • An amicus curiae brief filed by Arizona, urging the Court to act quickly
  • Responses to the Texas filing by each of the defendant states
  • An amici curiae brief filed by the District of Columbia and “States and territories of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Guam, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, U.S. Virgin Islands, and Washington” in support of Pennsylvania and the defendant states
  • A motion by Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Utah to intervene as plaintiffs
  • Two amicus curiae motions by members of the Pennsylvania house and senate, respectively, urging the Court to take the Texas case
  • An amicus curiae motion by the Christian Family Coalition in support of the Texas case
  • An amici curiae brief by the speaker and majority leader of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in support of the Texas case
  • A motion by “state legislators and voters” represented by the Justice Foundation and the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society, seeking to intervene and join the case as plaintiffs; their complaint was also filed
  • An amici curiae brief by 105 Republican members of the House of Representatives
  • An amici curiae brief by elected officials from four states in support of the Texas case
  • An amicus curiae brief by the City of Detroit in support of Pennsylvania and the defendants
  • An amicus curiae brief by the Justice and Freedom Fund in support of the Texas case
The sheer scale of filings in just three days — including from Democrats and groups on the left — for a case that the Supreme Court has not yet said it will hear may increase the chance that it will do so.
The Pennsylvania filing calls the Texas lawsuit a “seditious abuse of the judicial process,” prompting a shocked response from constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley: “Filing with the Supreme Court is the very antithesis of sedition.”
Pennsylvania’s attorney general, Josh Shapiro, whose name is on the filing, raised eyebrows and prompted calls for his resignation when he declared in advance of Election Day that Trump did not have the votes to win the state.


View Image

With the exception of the commie RINOs, it looks like all the suits are against voter fraud, and for Trump. :D
 

eugenegreen

herbalist
Veteran
it’s fucking done son,

picture.php


loser really made a disgraceful shitshow out of losing, huh

embarassing!
 

spadedNfaded

Active member
Veteran
Boogie, do you still believe in the Easter Bunny?


Anyway, back on planet Earth in Realityland Joe Biden and Kamala Harris won again - again, again.
 

Absolem

Active member
This didn't age well. Keep consuming the YouTube news you have been gobbling down.
Not one thing you have posted the last month has panned out to be true. Don't think the needle is in your hay stack


because those states disenfranchised voters in all other states illegally.

what states had a majority of votes for bidet errr biden? the ones who stopped vote counting and injected ballots for bidet without poll watchers present? or maybe just a handful of coastal elite counties.

you mockingbird media addicts can't for a minnit think for yourselves.

quit whining and crying about Trump if you think bidet will win, be at ease, you're just showing that poor sports will do anything to win.

and since you didn't win 4 years ago, you decided to obstruct Trumps Presidency with russia russia russia, stormy daniels, impeachment, covid1984 and the mail-in ballot cheat, emoluments clause BS, daily attacks by the mockingbird media, and some insane hatred fueled by jealous inability to think maybe, just maybe, that most Americans think the President has done a good job.


i savor the moment Trump prevails in SCOTUS and you will eat your words.
 

unclefishstick

Fancy Janitor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
The United States Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton seeking to overturn the results of the November presidential election in favor of Donald Trump late Friday.
“The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution,” the majority opinion read. “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.”
 

eugenegreen

herbalist
Veteran
boycott texas and the 17 other garbage-ass states that went along with this idiot dictator’s convoluted dreams (nightmares)
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
plenty of space on the left for the trumpers to now help push biden and the democratic party to serve the people.. just sayin lol
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
Nope, you win both Senate seats or everything gets blocked. Any Republicans that don't comply gets voted out. Politics is a dirty game.

Trump 2024
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
there's no real reason to support either party any more. attempting to fix that by strictly voting in trump sychophants ESPECIALLY isn't going to fix that lol neither is going full on american fascist. even trump himself was a failure. he was barely distinguishable from the neo-con "swamp" he proclaimed to be emptying (he wasn't).



this country needs a labor/workers party or movement. right wing populism/fascism is an appeal to the angst of the workers but it lacks the substance and solutions and instead continues to enrich the elite.
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
there's no real reason to support either party any more. attempting to fix that by strictly voting in trump sychophants ESPECIALLY isn't going to fix that lol neither is going full on american fascist. even trump himself was a failure. he was barely indistinguishable from the neo-con "swamp" he proclaimed to be emptying (he wasn't).



this country needs a labor/workers party or movement. right wing populism/fascism is an appeal to the angst of the workers but it lacks the substance and solutions and instead continues to enrich the elite.

Trump mainly ran on jobs, lower taxes and regulations, and immigration which all countries outside of the EU take seriously. I don't know what world you are living in but I don't see fascism anywhere, your examples are always very misleading. I will never support socialism or communism, I don't trust getting rid of the checks and balances in our government nor will I ever support one party rule. I do believe more should be done to help small businesses and average Americans.
 

mowood3479

Active member
Veteran
I'm ok with that. Those states are the leeches of society. They constantly hold everyone back, eat up immense financial resources and a lot of them (not all) provide nothing in return except politicians.

How about this, if your federal contribution is net negative you don't get any representation in Congress.

Have you seen the hunger games?
This sounds just like the Govt they had
 

mowood3479

Active member
Veteran
Trump didn't pay the small business owners who worked on his properties.
Hard to believe his supporters think he is for the little man.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trumps-business-plan-left-a-trail-of-unpaid-bills-1465504454

Most of the people I know (including myself) who voted for trump this time did so because he is preferable over biden on covid totaltarian govt shit and i think he will prove out to be much better in comparison on war.
Very few people think he is a messiah..
He is just the lesser of two evils imo..
There are simpletons out there but to put everyone in the same unnunaced basket isn’t much different from hating people for the color of their skin. (Imo)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top