G
Guest
Thanks ab.
Yes, there's lots of ramblings in here, mostly by me.
I recall your reports of your friend's success, and with the NIH link I posted, it seems that (despite them apparently using a 'manufactured or adulterated THCa molecule'), they are also showing progress or success.
I'm confused, as a renowned guru n this issue, on the forum, had referenced the THCa molecule simply being too big to breech the blood-brain barrier, and this had been reiterated by at least a couple others here and elsewhere. Basically saying that if the targeted CB1 receptor cite isn't in the brain, then have at it (re. using non-decarbed flower/extract).
But I have WAY too little information re. receptor cites directly related to the organ(s) in trouble, versus the action of the brain and the receptor sites there.
That all said, your report, and the June 2020 NIH study/review I posted the link to, both point to efficacy in treating cancers with out having to endure outrageous intoxication.
By the way, I'd have to do some all inclusive math, but I don't think I'm any where near a gram of RSO a day, if we combine all the various forms of cannabinoids I'm ingesting. But who knows? Maybe I'd surprise myself. Still believe I'd be way shy.
And, Weez seems to be having success, in his specific case, ingesting a lot less than a gram per day, too.
I think one thing we all agree on, is there's way too little known in a solid way about all of this. But for some, there's apparent success.
Yes, there's lots of ramblings in here, mostly by me.
I recall your reports of your friend's success, and with the NIH link I posted, it seems that (despite them apparently using a 'manufactured or adulterated THCa molecule'), they are also showing progress or success.
I'm confused, as a renowned guru n this issue, on the forum, had referenced the THCa molecule simply being too big to breech the blood-brain barrier, and this had been reiterated by at least a couple others here and elsewhere. Basically saying that if the targeted CB1 receptor cite isn't in the brain, then have at it (re. using non-decarbed flower/extract).
But I have WAY too little information re. receptor cites directly related to the organ(s) in trouble, versus the action of the brain and the receptor sites there.
That all said, your report, and the June 2020 NIH study/review I posted the link to, both point to efficacy in treating cancers with out having to endure outrageous intoxication.
By the way, I'd have to do some all inclusive math, but I don't think I'm any where near a gram of RSO a day, if we combine all the various forms of cannabinoids I'm ingesting. But who knows? Maybe I'd surprise myself. Still believe I'd be way shy.
And, Weez seems to be having success, in his specific case, ingesting a lot less than a gram per day, too.
I think one thing we all agree on, is there's way too little known in a solid way about all of this. But for some, there's apparent success.
Last edited: