You are right in that if people really want to do harm they will find a way. The thing that kicked off the gun clampdown was the Port Arthur Massacre (at a famous historical site). The thing that got me was the speed with which this happened. You could argue that if citizens had guns this could have been halted earlier, however I'm not convinced. My understanding is that the sort of weapon he used is completely banned now. An exert from an article about it;
Bryant killed 12 people in 15 seconds.
On the gravel path outside the cafe Kingston tried to herd people who thought the gunshots were part of a historical re-enactment up the garden and out of range. He knew he couldn’t go back inside. “You don’t get a second chance with a gun like that,” Kingston says.
Bryant moved towards the gift shop in the next 75 seconds, killing another eight people. In little over half an hour the death toll would be 35, with 23 wounded. It became the worst single-person mass shooting in Australia’s history; and is still the third worst recorded worldwide.
The gun was an AR-15 rifle with a 30-shot magazine. Bryant exchanged it for a semi-automatic .308 FN rifle he had stowed in the boot of his car. Both were then legal in Tasmania,
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...lia-made-gun-control-happen-after-port-arthur
Guys like that in America are usually hyped up on some drug they were prescribed for a mental condition, when they mass shoot. Was was that guy on? Or it's a staged fake school shooting. End result, cries for taking away our guns.
As for no forced vax in Oz, so they did not impose restrictions on un-vax'd kids, or take away the child tax credit if the kid wasn't vax'd? Article said they did, and I bet gates has given the PM a bunch of money.
See, I dunno, Just what I read on the internet. Here we have this pedo-island frequent visitor named dershowitz, who thinks he is in charge of what American laws mean, and he says we MUST be vax'd if they decide they want us vax'd. I will refuse, armed if needed.