Anyone try cooling the discharge with a flat plate heat exchanger?
I picked one up from duda diesel. It's stainless with copper solders. Was thinking of making a refrigerant cooling system for it using r134.
For sure, I realize that the 25' coil is technically an "immersion chiller" , but i want to immerse it into a 190-200 proof alky or glycol bath that is chilled off power not DI.
Flat - thats close, but far away still...Powers cheap, DI is expensive...can we plug this thing in....I'm a simple minded individual, no doubt......Much Love and thanks fo the help!!
I have never seen a plate chiller where the internals were not copper plates that were cnc'd out to have channels and completely SS, could you provide a link please?
Stainless plates with copper brazing:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/B3-12A-10-P...Domain_0&var=620131572185&hash=item51adac031b
Perma,
Have you looked into a company called Neslab? They make immersion chillers and have a few that are designed to replace dry ice in what seems to be our exact type application. They suggest using them to replace DI as a source for chilling a liquid right in the marketing brochure. I think it's the CC (Cryo Cool) model series I was looking at.
The MT69 tubes are too small to use with butane at ultra low temperatures, because of how thick it gets and because any water freezes and forms slush. We now make our own, and our design is evolving.
Our first one was an insulated stainless pot with couplings welded in the bottom and side, so that a 20' coil of 3/8" stainless tubing self drains out the bottom port. Picture below of outside plumbing. With ice water and dry ice, it dropped the tank pressure 100 psi.
I have two ~ 8 1/2" coils of 3/8" stainless tubing 50' long en-route, for the next round and will wind smaller coils in the same exchanger, for cooling other streams, as well as for a liquid N2 stream to cool the exchanger itself.
I don't think I would be able to build my own heat exchanger. Do you think I can run the CPS TR21 recovery pump without one and get away with it? Im not very good at building so I don't know if that's an option for me. Thanks for all your help GW
A TR-21 runs too hot without some sort of heat exchanger. You can buy 3/8" stainless coils already wound at brewery supply houses, so all you would really have to add for a simple system, would be the fittings and valves. Any mechanic or plumber could do that for you.
This is what subzero extractors said I asked them on facebook the same thing when I asked you on here: "No, the pump runs fine. the heat exchanger is called the MT69 and its to cool and condense the solvent after it comes out of the pump. I guess it could be considered a heat exchanger but its not necessary for running that specific pump." I am very confused on this because they said its fine without one? I might just get a Promax RG6000 that seems to be the easier route.
Doesn't SZ use a passive extraction with active recovery afterwards? All of the videos I have seen of their systems use a top shower and only hook up the pump to recover at the end.
If that is the case, I could see why they are saying a heat exchanger isn't necessary for their application.
Doesn't SZ use a passive extraction with active recovery afterwards? All of the videos I have seen of their systems use a top shower and only hook up the pump to recover at the end.
If that is the case, I could see why they are saying a heat exchanger isn't necessary for their application.
Huh? How is that? If your using the pump, your using the pump.......was this a joke?
Was it a joke? No.
As I said, from the videos I have seen of their extractions, they use the pump to recover the butane into their recovery tank after the extraction is done passively. All of the cooling effort is put onto their tank and ice bath after the extraction itself is already done, the pump isn't part of cycling the butane for the extraction cycle.
I was just stating that I can see *for their application* why they would say the MT69 is not necessary, they aren't taking the freshly re-condensed solvent and cycling it back through the system. And don't get me wrong, I wasn't saying it was a good idea or was ideal for the pump.
That said I don't see why their recommendations should be different than the CPS recommendations.....Its only $150, don't their machines cost 9-15k??