SRM/GEOENGINEERING

[bentom187]

In the context of the 1930,s her views were pretty tame , compared to what was said and enacted in Europe.
If you start deconstructing people from another era you can usually find something that offends current mores , and the good she did outweighs the dodgy rhetoric.

Ok so your distinction is time and place ,not the result's.
You have not defined the good of eugenics either. Except they are taking up resources of the "desirables".
I make the distinction because there has to be one in your view. Desirable vs undesirable.

What would be the distinction of who should have life and not, outside your own personal family ?

If it was good in another time and place why isn't it good now , in your opinion ?

They were aiming for the same end's , in Margaret Sanger's word's.
( Which were despicable) Also you agreed at the conclusion of your last post.

Why not do away with the niceties of controlled contraception by the state and just put the undesirables on trains , and off to facilities to be euthanized ?

Have fun trying to explain away Nazi policies.

 

[SativaBreather]

In the context of the 1930,s her views were pretty tame , compared to what was said and enacted in Europe.
If you start deconstructing people from another era you can usually find something that offends current mores , and the good she did outweighs the dodgy rhetoric.

the good she did? what a wanker you are
http://blackquillandink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/margaret-sanger-quotes.pdf
http://www.dianedew.com/sanger.htm
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/03/11/...m-planned-parenthood-founder-margaret-sanger/

 

[SativaBreather]

double posthttp://www.lifenews.com/2013/03/11/...m-planned-parenthood-founder-margaret-sanger/

 

[trichrider]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



ROCKEFELLER EUGENICS BANDWAGON. For nearly a century, the Rockefeller scions and the Rockefeller Foundation have been the most visible and consistent patrons and agents of an anti-Christian social order, whose religion, as Sir Julian HUXLEY long ago promised, is EUGENICS — the systematic socio-scientific intervention in order to improve the human racial stock through social and genetic engineering. The foundation's 1994 annual report announced a "second contraceptive revolution." The foundation helped engineer the first contraceptive revolution by funding Margaret SANGER's Planned Parenthood of America, as well as supporting the research, development and deployment of many contraceptive/abortifacient products.

"THE BEST INTENTIONS" PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN. The foundation's announcement denotes a multi-layered apparatus already in place. In April 1995 the Institute of Medicine, an important adjunct to the Rockefeller-founded National Research Council, published a study, "The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-Being of Children and Families",1,2 funded by several long-time eugenics links — the U.S. Public Health Service, the Carnegie Corporation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation — and a new player, the Annie E. Casey Foundation.

"The Best Intentions" is a carefully wrought propaganda campaign to induce Americans to choose "longterm contraception", including Norplant, Depo-Provera, new brass IUDs, abortifacient vaccines that cause "immunological sterilization",3 and someday, bizarre male and female contraceptives, including a male "contraceptive" that "stops sperm production" but whose side effects will have to be countered with female steroid progesterone." 4

FALSE ANTI-ABORTIONISM OF LONGTERM CONTRACEPTION. The premise of "The Best Intentions" is that a full 60% of U.S. pregnancies are "unintended" — the result of failed contraception or no contraception. The study warns that a mistaken focus on teenage pregnancy prevents understanding just how widespread "unintended pregnancy" is. It also relates the 60% "unintended pregnancy" rate to 800,000 abortions per year, and promises that "longterm contraception", much of which is abortifacient, would prevent that many abortions.

So the agents of decriminalized abortion now are seemingly opposed to the tragic number of babies aborted yearly in the U.S. Yet in 1973, Dr. John KNOWLES, then president of the Rockefeller Foundation, called for an apparatus to smooth the way for 1.4 million abortions per year — a body count eerily accurate in 1995.5 "The Best Intentions" calls for all levels of government, and even families and educators, to promote this shift to "longterm contraception", and calls on "philanthropic foundations", as if they were outsiders, "to meet this challenge".6

"The Best Intentions" is the soft presentation of the "second contraceptive revolution." The hard presentation came from a Rockefeller-founded (and funded) eugenics think tank, the Hastings Center. The January-February 1995 Hastings Center Report was a special supplement entitled "Long-Acting Contraception: Moral Choices, Policy Dilemmas"; it emerged from a "two year project on the ethics of long-acting contraceptives".7 "Moral choices" and "policy dilemmas" are verbal smokescreens: the policy has already been made behind closed doors, and the "moral choices" will be for the Rockefeller syndicate to define and spread.

COERCION DISGUISED AS BENEVOLENCE. Hastings’ high priests seem to be wondering how to overcome the specter of long-term "contraceptives" being "dismissed by some as instruments of class prejudice and eugenic social coercion".8 Perhaps just the right public relations firm will give coercion a happy face. Eugenics propagandist Garrett HARDIN considered this problem and offered his recommendations:

Coercion is a dirty word to liberals now, but it need not forever be so. As with the four-letter words, its dirtiness can be cleansed away by exposure to the light, by saying it over and over without apology or embarrassment. To many, the word coercion implies arbitrary decisions of distant and irresponsible bureaucrats, but this is not a necessary part of its meaning. The only kind of coercion I recommend is mutual coercion, mutually agreed upon by the majority of the people affected.9

Another of his pro-coercion meditations:


Freedom to breed is also counterproductive ... beyond a certain level of population or population-growth rate. ... If we want to be equitable in the allocation of the right to breed, we must say that an individual has such a right until she has n children, but not beyond. Beyond n she has broken the law.10

"BEYOND FAMILY PLANNING". So, "longterm contraception" is a form of what Bernard BERELSON called "beyond family planning." This approach already in place in developing countries provides incentives to those who limit the number of their children according to population controllers' appraisal of what is compatible with "sustainable development".11

Abortion on demand was but a stopgap measure, although a lethal and ruthless one. Lacking was the means to prevent people from having children. Surgical abortion had to be the backup until the preferred contraceptives, abortifacients and sterilization methods had been developed. As these move to market, cutting down on surgical abortion will be part of the public relations campaign to achieve a voluntary shift in conduct that will someday explode into outright coercion.

Anti-fertility vaccines have long been linked to coercive reproductive social policy. In 1971, in The Case for Compulsory Birth Control, Edgar R. CHASTEEN, then a national board member of Zero Population Growth and a board member of Planned Parenthood of Greater Kansas City, predicted:


Assuming that we could soon have a vaccine to immunize against fertility, it would then be possible to inoculate all children. Unlike the smallpox vaccine which furnishes lifelong protection, however, the antifertility vaccine will have to be reversible. Following marriage, fertility could be temporarily restored by another shot. After the permitted number of births, permanent immunity to fertility could be re-established.12



"CONSPIRATORS OF THE "SECOND CONTRACEPTIVE REVOLUTION" was never kept secret. A 1978 meeting at Rockefeller University, suggested vaccines as a "beyond the pill" strategy.13 This solution would eventually put teeth in Dr. Allan C. BARNES's 1973 (when he was head of the Rockefeller Foundation) dictum:

"Death control without birth control is pure folly".14


In the 1970's a consortium was formed to develop the vaccines and other new long-term contraceptives that would help cut the live-birth rate in half (the stated goal of the global population control machine). The consortium comprised:

· The World Health Organization, the Population Council (funded by eugenicists such as the Andrew Mellon Foundation, the Dodge and Rockefeller Foundations, USAID and the National Institutes of Health).15
· The National Institute of Immunology in New Delhi, India, funded in part by the Rockefeller Foundation.16
· CONRAD (the Contraceptive Research and Development) Program at Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk. Their focus is "anti-sperm" contraceptives designed to prevent fertilization.17
· The taxpayer-funded National Institute of Child Health and Development, especially its Contraceptive Development Branch in the Center for Population Research.18,19

ANTI-FERTILITY VACCINES. The vaccines they developed are abortifacient. Furthermore, the woman's auto-immune system must be suppressed for the destroying antibodies to move in and prevent fertilization or implantation. Some scientists have said that immunizing women against their own babies could unleash new auto-immune diseases.20 These "anti-fertility vaccines" are in Phase III trials in the Philippines and Mexico, where they have been combined with tetanus immunizations given to women and pre-pubertal girls without their understanding what is happening to them.

The killing power of these vaccines is being disguised. Indian contraceptive researcher Dr. Gursaran Pran TALWAR defended the World Health Organization when it was charged with causing abortion through anti-fertility vaccine administration in the Philippines and Mexico. Talwar considered the embryo a non-human "pre-fetal" product; thus, any human being killed from fertilization through the eighth week of life, either by vaccine technology or by surgical abortion, could not be said to have been killed. The vaccine, he said, is not abortifacient. "It intercepts the implantation of the embryo to the endometrium." 21 The woman vaccinated against pregnancy will never even know she was pregnant.

http://panindigan.tripod.com/2ndcontrarev.html
..................

The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz.Much of the spiritual guidance and political agitation for the American eugenics movement came from California's quasi-autonomous eugenic societies, such as the Pasadena-based Human Betterment Foundation and the California branch of the American Eugenics Society, which coordinated much of their activity with the Eugenics Research Society in Long Island.
These organizations--which functioned as part of a closely-knit network--published racist eugenic newsletters and pseudoscientific journals, such as Eugenical News and Eugenics, and propagandized for the Nazis.

Eugenics was born as a scientific curiosity in the Victorian age. In 1863, Sir Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, theorized that if talented people only married other talented people, the result would be measurably better offspring. At the turn of the last century, Galton's ideas were imported into the United States just as Gregor Mendel's principles of heredity were rediscovered. American eugenic advocates believed with religious fervor that the same Mendelian concepts determining the color and size of peas, corn and cattle also governed the social and intellectual character of man.In an America demographically reeling from immigration upheaval and torn by post-Reconstruction chaos, race conflict was everywhere in the early twentieth century. Elitists, utopians and so-called "progressives" fused their smoldering race fears and class bias with their desire to make a better world. They reinvented Galton's eugenics into a repressive and racist ideology. The intent: populate the earth with vastly more of their own socio-economic and biological kind--and less or none of everyone else. -

See more at: http://hnn.us/article/1796#sthash.XKvvLfwx.dpuf

 

[foomar]

Ok so your distinction is time and place ,not the result's.
You have not defined the good of eugenics either. Except they are taking up resources of the "desirables".
I make the distinction because there has to be one in your view. Desirable vs undesirable.

I said that in the 30,s this philosophy was almost mainstream , I did not say it was acceptable then or now.

Desireable would be every child to be wanted , planned for and with a good quality of life , undesireable would be unplanned parenthood at an early age resulting in large families living in poverty.

Don't breed what you cant feed .

What would be the distinction of who should have life and not, outside your own personal family ?

I make no distinction of race , creed or colour , but feel that abortion is the best option for the severely disabled if spotted in time , but the mother has the final decision.

If it was good in another time and place why isn't it good now , in your opinion ?

They were aiming for the same end's , in Margaret Sanger's word's.
( Which were despicable) Also you agreed at the conclusion of your last post.

It never was good , but was popular in that era , taken to extremes by the Nazis with many promoteing eugenics in the UK.


Sanger got contraception started , by empowering women to make a choice she improved the life of millions , which outweighs the Nazi slant in my book.

 

[SativaBreather]

you are so shortsighted - it was not sanger, she was just a rockefeller front

and Hitler was a Rothschild

 

[harold]

ANTI-FERTILITY VACCINES. The vaccines they developed are abortifacient. Furthermore, the woman's auto-immune system must be suppressed for the destroying antibodies to move in and prevent fertilization or implantation. Some scientists have said that immunizing women against their own babies could unleash new auto-immune diseases.20 These "anti-fertility vaccines" are in Phase III trials in the Philippines and Mexico, where they have been combined with tetanus immunizations given to women and pre-pubertal girls without their understanding what is happening to them.

and under force, often armed force.

 

[bentom187]

I wrote a more detailed post, but the computer shit the bed. This is the short version.

I said that in the 30,s this philosophy was almost mainstream , I did not say it was acceptable then or now.

Desireable would be every child to be wanted , planned for and with a good quality of life , undesireable would be unplanned parenthood at an early age resulting in large families living in poverty.

Don't breed what you cant feed .

Well you do discriminate on a economic level , and this is the opinion that you and the government agree about. And you are right to a degree , but the causes are many but largely due to a lack of open markets and over regulation ,the government itself. So it is the cause of the economic inequality and the cause of the parents resorting to abortions.
The cities have a abundance of poor people, and they tend to predominantly of color. So that's where these family planning services are located. I am not saying white people don't use it, they do. But these family planning services are more likely to be used by people other than white. And since they are poor they usually qualify for the state paying for the procedure.

Too Many Aborted

Eugenicists Rejoice: More Black Babies Aborted Than Born in NYC

I make no distinction of race , creed or colour , but feel that abortion is the best option for the severely disabled if spotted in time , but the mother has the final decision..

Well here is some news ,the severely disabled value their lives as much as you. I can only come to one conclusion that the mother has chosen abortion over adoption because she was told that it was the right thing to do ,instead of giving her baby up for adoption which would be far more merciful.

It never was good , but was popular in that era , taken to extremes by the Nazis with many promoteing eugenics in the UK.


Sanger got contraception started , by empowering women to make a choice she improved the life of millions , which outweighs the Nazi slant in my book.

She empowered women to voluntarily kill their children.Contraception is safe sex or abstaining ,birth control in general, not murder. She was talking about killing them. Just re-read her quotes.

And then we are just nit picking the means to accomplish the same end's. Which is the practice of eugenics.

Like I said before the evolution of this goes from voluntary, because its trendy and empowering, to mandatory because the state says so.

About the article below. I read on anther site she got it to pursue her modeling career.

A Woman Filmed Her Abortion to Show That 'It's Not Scary'

California Prisons Were Illegally Sterilizing Female Inmates

Forced sterilization of institutionalized human beings — those in mental institutions, or in prisons, for example — has a long and gruesome history in the U.S

sometimes for inmates deemed likely to be repeat offenders, or those with many children — argued that they were doing so only in the event of a "medical emergency," a designation that would also allow them to bypass the review process.

Victims of forced sterilization to receive $10 million from North Carolina

From 1929 to 1974 North Carolina forcibly sterilized thousands of men, women and children, usually without their consent. It was part of a larger eugenics movement that believed poverty, promiscuity, and alcoholism were inherited traits, and that without them the gene pool could be improved.

Man’s plea deal includes vasectomy requirement


Well I see these are setting dangerous presidents in the legal system, the opinion of the state and their excuse of it being for the public good is exactly what I stated earlier.
I can see the mentally ill angle ,being manipulated to include political opinions. 'Gun nut "right wing nuts" "anti abortion nuts" "anti government nuts" ect... ect...

 

[SativaBreather]

good post man

 

[foomar]

Well here is some news ,the severely disabled value their lives as much as you. I can only come to one conclusion that the mother has chosen abortion over adoption because she was told that it was the right thing to do ,instead of giving her baby up for adoption which would be far more merciful.

It would be more mercifull if the afflicted child had never been born in the first place , we chose to abort one child when the tests confirmed Downs , and have no regrets.

There was no pressure from the hospital to do this , purely a joint personal choice , as it should be.

Severe physical disability can be lived with and overcome , mental disability is an entirely different burden that we feel is best avoided by termination if tests are available.

Does this make us Nazi,s or realists ?

Hitler was a Rothschild

You should stop reading prisonplanet or the Icke forums , it will rot your brain

 

[bombadil.360]

For nearly a century, the Rockefeller scions and the Rockefeller Foundation have been the most visible and consistent patrons and agents of an anti-Christian social order, whose religion, as Sir Julian HUXLEY long ago promised, is EUGENICS

Anti-Christian and Julian Huxley, a known Nazi term and a known supporter of Jewish Genocide.

great sources there trich.

LOL!

 

[bombadil.360]

It would be more mercifull if the afflicted child had never been born in the first place , we chose to abort one child when the tests confirmed Downs , and have no regrets.

There was no pressure from the hospital to do this , purely a joint personal choice , as it should be.

Severe physical disability can be lived with and overcome , mental disability is an entirely different burden that we feel is best avoided by termination if tests are available.

Does this make us Nazi,s or realists ?



You should stop reading prisonplanet or the Icke forums , it will rot your brain

foomar, what's funny is that we can turn their arguments around and make a conspiracy theory of our own, well, actually, a very well known conspiracy theory, that states that the Christians don't want any contraceptive options available, specially for the poor, like the Catholic prohibition on such, so that more wage-slaves are born into poor families, leaving them no option except to become wage-slaves. if they allow contraceptives to be given out freely, their amount of available slaves will go down rapidly. this was actually expressed many times by Chavez in Venezuela, he had a war against the Catholic Church, that is, until he became sick, came back to the faith, and paid tons of money to have Catholic masses for the sake of his health.

people are nuts, and people trying to explain things through scape-goats and over-looking the huge complexity of existence and all contained within, are merely simpletons.

peace!

 

[SativaBreather]

Does this make us Nazi,s or realists ?



You should stop reading prisonplanet or the Icke forums , it will rot your brain

you should wake the fuck up dozy c,unt, its not disputed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uH9r1z0npCs

also read Carrol Quigleys Tragedy and Hope and Anglo-American Establishment, if you are able

 

[RonSmooth]

I sense some intellectual dishonesty in here.

Must be a conservative nearby!

Seriously though.

Just say it.

We all know what you mean.

Just like when we know what "no jerseys or baggy jeans" means.

 

[trichrider]

Anti-Christian and Julian Huxley, a known Nazi term and a known supporter of Jewish Genocide.

great sources there trich.

LOL!

“As a social movement, eugenics reached its greatest popularity in the early decades of the 20th century. At this point in time, eugenics was practiced around the world and was promoted by governments, and influential individuals and institutions. Many countries enacted various eugenics policies and programs, including: genetic screening, birth control promoting differential birth rates, marriage restrictions, segregation (both racial segregation and segregation of the mentally ill from the rest of the population), compulsory sterilization, forced abortions or forced pregnancies and genocide.”
One country that embraced eugenics enthusiastically was the United States of America. This is because the wealthy Rockefeller Foundation (and many others) was vigorously promoting and paying for the movement. The Rockefeller Foundation not only promoted it in America, but also all over the world, particularly in Germany through the ‘Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics.’ This of course led directly to Nazi Germany’s racial policies and the attempt to create the ‘Aryan Superman.’
Because the Nazi’s took eugenics to its ultimate and logical conclusions, it has obviously developed a bad reputation and it is seldom mentioned in ‘polite circles’ anymore. Even so, eugenics has not gone away – the Wikipedia article points out that eugenic policy only ceased in liberal Sweden in 1975. However, because of the Nazi connection, a makeover was necessary – a new image was required. Frederick Henry Osborn (the author of ‘The Future of Human Heredity’ 1968), tells us that: “Eugenic goals are most likely to be attained under another name than eugenics.” Therefore, names and programs such as ‘family planning’ – ‘birth control’ ‘social science’ – ‘health care’ – ‘population control’ etc. are often used today to hide ongoing eugenic policies.
One of the biggest promoters of eugenic policies today is the United Nations (with the Rockefeller Foundation in the background – the Rockefeller Foundation donated the land in New York on which the United Nations headquarters stands). We can easily find this eugenic philosophy and practice in the United Nations if we examine just one man, the first director of the ‘United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’ (UNESCO) – Julian Huxley. Julian Huxley comes from a family line stepped in evolution and eugenics. Julian’s grandfather was called ‘Darwin’s Bulldog.’ Charles Darwin may have re-invented evolutionary theory, but it was Thomas Huxley who made it popular. Julian also had a famous brother – the author of the equally famous prophetic novel, ‘Brave New World’ - Aldous Huxley. In this ‘brave new world’ eugenics features prominently – where man becomes de-humanized for the sake of ‘scientific progress.’


http://propheticintelligencereport.org/eugenics-and-depopulation/


sorry you are sick. hope you get better...

 

[SativaBreather]

I sense some intellectual dishonesty in here.

Must be a conservative nearby!

Seriously though.

Just say it.

We all know what you mean.

Just like when we know what "no jerseys or baggy jeans" means.

who you talking to? i have no clue wtf ya on about

 

[bentom187]

..............

 

[foomar]

and Hitler was a Rothschild

you should wake the fuck up dozy c,unt, its not disputed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uH9r1z0npCs

If you believe the shite on tube vids and alex jones you really are a muppet , with a dirty mouth.

The rumor that Adolf Hitler was the grandson of a Rothschild seems to have been hatched in the mind of a crypto-Jewish propagandist working in the United States’ first unified intelligence agency, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). Not long after, a former high Nazi official, waiting for his execution, “confessed” to discovering a “Jewish grandfather” in Hitler’s background. These fabrications have been thoroughly debunked, and the true story of Hitler’s family background is told below

The real truth about Hitlers lineage.

http://carolynyeager.net/fake-legends-adolf-hitler%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9cjewish-grandfather%e2%80%9d

 

[trichrider]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0-zKZhdjsI

[YOUTUBEIF]b0-zKZhdjsI[/YOUTUBEIF]

 

[trichrider]

Monsanto’s “Insidious” GM0 Food and its Dark Connections to the Military Industrial Complex


Monsanto, the world’s largest genetically modified (GM/GMO) seed producer, has been at the centre of controversy for decades as evidence of the harmful effects on humans of GM foods continues to mount. Joined with the likes of DuPont’s Pioneer Hi-Bred International and Syngenta, Monsanto and partners comprise the corporate nexus of Big-Agri, where the control over our food supply is increasingly transferred into the hands of private trans-national corporations as opposed to local farmers and governments.

A US peer-reviewed study conducted last year which was published in the scientific journal Entropy, linked Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup – which is the most popular weed killer in the world – to infertility, cancers and Parkinsons Disease amongst other ailments.

The authors of the study were Stephanie Seneff, a research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Anthony Samsel, a retired science consultant from Arthur D. Little, Inc. and a former private environmental government contractor. The main ingredient in Roundup is the “insidious” glyphosate, which the study found to be a deeply harmful chemical:

“Glyphosate enhances the damaging effects of other food borne chemical residues and environmental toxins. Negative impact on the body is insidious and manifests slowly over time as inflammation damages cellular systems throughout the body…….Consequences are most of the diseases and conditions associated with a Western diet, which include gastrointestinal disorders, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, depression, autism, infertility, cancer and Alzheimer’s disease” (Samsel and Seneff, 2013).

The Executive Director of the Institute for Responsible Technology (IRT) Jeffrey M. Smith has discovered a link between gluten disorders and GM foods in a study he conducted last year. Gluten disorders have sharply risen over the past 2 decades, which correlates with GM foods being introduced into the food supply. Smith asserts that GM foods – including soy and corn – are the possible “environmental triggers” that have contributed to the rapid increase of gluten disorders that effect close to 20 million American’s today:

“Bt-toxin, glyphosate, and other components of GMOs, are linked to five conditions that may either initiate or exacerbate gluten-related disorders…..If glyphosate activates retinoic acid, and retinoic acid activates gluten sensitivity, eating GMOs soaked with glyphosate may play a role in the onset of gluten-related disorders” (Smith, 2013).

One of the more damming studies on the safety of GM foods was led by biologist Dr. Gilles-Eric Seralini of the University of Caen, which was the first study to examine the long term affects on rats that had consumed Monsanto’s GM corn and its Roundup herbicide. The study was conducted over a 2 year period – which is the average life-span of a rat – as opposed to Monsanto’s usual period of 90 days. The peer-reviewed study found horrifying effects on the rats health, with a 200% to 300% increase in large tumours, severe organ damage to the kidney and liver and 70% of female participant rats suffered premature death. The first tumours only appeared 4 to 7 months into the research, highlighting the need for longer trials.

Initially the study was published in the September issue of Food and Chemical Toxicology, but was then later retracted after the publisher felt the study was “inconclusive”, although there was no suspicion of fraud or intentional deceit. Dr. Seralini strongly protested the decision and believed “economic interests” were behind the decision as a former Monsanto employee had joined the journal. Monsanto is infamous for employing swaths of lobbyists to control the political, scientific and administrative decisions relating to the organisation, and this incident was a major whitewash by the GM producer to stop the barrage of negative media reports relating to the toxic effects of their products. The study led by Dr. Seralini was later published in a less well renowned journal, the Environmental Sciences Europe, which reignited the fears of GM foods safety.

France has recently implemented a ban on Monsanto produced maize (MON810) – a different variety of the Monsanto GM corn that was discussed in the study above (NK603) – citing environmental concerns as the reason for the ban. France joins a list of countries including Italy and Poland who have imposed bans on GM corn over the past few years. Additionally, Russian MPs have introduced a draft into parliament which could see GM producers punished as terrorists and criminally prosecuted if they are deemed to have harmed the environment or human health. In India, many of the GM seeds sold to Indian farmers under the pretext of greater harvests failed to deliver, which led to an estimated 200,000 Indian farmers committing suicide due to an inability to repay debts.

There is growing evidence to support the theory that bee colonies are collapsing due to GM crops being used in agriculture, with America seeing the largest fall in bee populations in recent years. Resistance to Monsanto and GM foods has been growing in recent years after the launch of the worldwide ‘March Against Monsanto’ in 2012, which organises global protests against the corporation and its toxic products within 52 countries. Monsanto was also voted the ‘most evil corporation’ of 2013 in a poll conducted by the website Natural News, beating the Federal Reserve and British Petroleum to take the top position.

Monsanto Produced and Supplied Toxic Agent Orange

Researching Monsanto’s past reveals a very dark history that has been well documented for years. During the Vietnam War, Monsanto was contracted to produce and supply the US government with a malevolent chemical for military application. Along with other chemical giants at the time such as Dow Chemical, Monsanto produced the military herbicide Agent Orange which contained high quantities of the deadly chemical Dioxin. Between 1961 and 1971, the US Army sprayed between 50 and 80 million litres of Agent Orange across Vietnamese jungles, forests and strategically advantageous positions. It was deployed in order to destroy forests and fertile lands which provided cover and food for the opposing troops. The fallout was devastating, with Vietnam estimating that 400,000 people died or were maimed due to Agent Orange, as well as 500,000 children born with birth defects and up to 2 million people suffer from cancer or other diseases. Millions of US veterans were also exposed and many have developed similar illnesses. The consequences are still felt and are thought to continue for a century as cancer, birth defects and other diseases are exponential due to them being passed down through generations.

Today, deep connections exist between Monsanto, the ‘Military Industrial Complex’ and the US Government which have to be documented to understand the nature of the corporation. On Monsanto’s Board of Directors sits the former Chairman of the Board and CEO of the giant war contractor Lockheed Martin, Robert J. Stevens, who was also appointed in 2012 by Barack Obama to the Advisory Committee for Trade Policy and Negotiations. As well as epitomising the revolving door that exists between the US Government and private trans-national corporations, Stevens is a member of the parallel government in the US, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). A second board member at Monsanto is Gwendolyn S. King, who also sits on the board of Lockheed Martin where she chairs the Orwellian ‘Ethics and Sustainability Committee”. Individuals who are veterans of the corporate war industry should not be allowed control over any populations food supply! Additionally, Monsanto board member Dr. George H. Poste is a former member of the Defense Science Board and the Health Board of the U.S. Department of Defense, as well as a Fellow of the Royal Society and a member of the CFR.

Bill Gates made headlines in 2010 when The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation bought 500,000 Monsanto shares worth a total of $23 million, raising questions as to why his foundation would invest in such a malign corporation. William H. Gates Sr. – Bill’s father – is the former head of Planned Parenthood and a strong advocate of eugenics – the philosophy that there are superior and inferior types of human beings, with the inferior type often sterilised or culled under the pretext of being a plague on society. During his 2010 TED speech, Bill Gates reveals his desire to reduce the population of the planet by “10 or 15 percent” in the coming years through such technologies as “vaccines”:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really good job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent” (4.37 into the video).

In 2006, Monsanto acquired a company that has developed – in partnership with the US Department of Agriculture – what is popularly termed terminator seeds, a future major trend in the GM industry. Terminator Seeds or suicide seeds are engineered to become sterile after the first harvest, destroying the ancient practice of saving seeds for future crops. This means farmers are forced to buy new seeds every year from Big-Agri, which produces high debts and a form of servitude for the farmers.

http://www.theanalystreport.net/201...nnections-to-the-military-industrial-complex/