Get the distinct impression that GM cannabis might not go down too well . .
How do you feel about mutation breeding with radiation ?
Acceptable or a dead end ?
It has a long and successful history with a number of common food crops , and it only increases the incidence of a natural process that has driven evolution.
Downside is you still need to grow out thousands to find a useful non lethal sport , and unlike GM its more or less random.
Deleting or recombining the existing DNA should have less opposition than transgenics , and could produce some interesting variants.
How do you feel about mutation breeding with radiation ?
Acceptable or a dead end ?
It has a long and successful history with a number of common food crops , and it only increases the incidence of a natural process that has driven evolution.
Downside is you still need to grow out thousands to find a useful non lethal sport , and unlike GM its more or less random.
Deleting or recombining the existing DNA should have less opposition than transgenics , and could produce some interesting variants.
Ionizing radiation includes ultra-violet (UV) light, X-ray, Gamma rays, and neutrons. These high-energy forms of radiation cause double-strand breaks of the DNA double helix. Once pieces of the DNA are broken, cellular repair mechanisms stitch the pieces back together. These DNA repair systems can only handle low rates of radiation, however, and increases in the rate of exposure to ionizing radiation causes permanent mutations to occur and accumulate in an organism’s genome. Radiation causes deletions of nucleotides from the DNA sequence. These deletions can cause reading-frame shifts, inactive protein products, or faulty transcripts. This typically results in null mutations, which are those in which a particular gene is inactivated.