What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

SB 374 Will prevent Nevadans from growing their own!

HUGE

Active member
Veteran
So are these all new eyes being the assembly instead of senate? Or have these people seen it already.
 

Griz66

New member
Thank you guys for doing all the hard work and gathering all the facts, I know I appreciate it! I did have a few questions if anyone knows the answers.

I was also wondering if it had new wording? Also does anyone know at this point in the process can they just change the wording? Or would the bill just die? Is there still time to speak out against this bill in an open forum of some sort other than the bill comments?

Also any idea where we can confirm this grandfathered in clause?

This all really sucks =/

Thanks again for the info!
 

Anteah

Member
As far as I understand they can introduce new amendment during the upcoming (if it will ever happen by the 3rd) Assembly Judiciary Committee meeting. So far no new language about the no grow though. Grandfathering or anything related would have to be introduced in that upcoming amendment. It is not showing to be on Thursday's Agenda, so the way I see it it's only Friday and Saturday left for it to even be heard by them. I honestly don't see how there is any time for it to do all it needs to do and still pass, but I am not experienced in this. Maybe someone who knows more can chime in.
 

resinryder

Rubbing my glands together
Veteran
Ok to answer this--
So are these all new eyes being the assembly instead of senate? Or have these people seen it already.

This---
Does it have new wording or text changing the no grow

And this---
Thank you guys for doing all the hard work and gathering all the facts, I know I appreciate it! I did have a few questions if anyone knows the answers.

I was also wondering if it had new wording? Also does anyone know at this point in the process can they just change the wording? Or would the bill just die? Is there still time to speak out against this bill in an open forum of some sort other than the bill comments?

Also any idea where we can confirm this grandfathered in clause?

This all really sucks =/

Thanks again for the info!

See this. it's pretty much spot on.Good job Anteah---

As far as I understand they can introduce new amendment during the upcoming (if it will ever happen by the 3rd) Assembly Judiciary Committee meeting. So far no new language about the no grow though. Grandfathering or anything related would have to be introduced in that upcoming amendment. It is not showing to be on Thursday's Agenda, so the way I see it it's only Friday and Saturday left for it to even be heard by them. I honestly don't see how there is any time for it to do all it needs to do and still pass, but I am not experienced in this. Maybe someone who knows more can chime in.


Any new amendment will be introduced during the Assembly Judiciary Committee hearing and was told by my friend that Tick Segerbloom emailed him that it woul be amended during the assembly hearing. We'll see.
It will be tight but it can get through by the 3rd if they push it. BTW, they can work Sundays too. It will have to get through the Assembly Judiciary and Finical committees and be voted on by the 3rd, this coming Monday, for the assembly to vote on it. So 3 working days or it won't happen this session. Whatever happens will be FAST!! So keep ya eyes peeled.
 

MangoCat

Member
Fucking law enforcement... I hope in the next 2 - 4 years we can extradite our meds from this fucking war on drugs and keep law enforcement out of our medicine cabinet. Fuckers!
This shit is still between Me, my Doctor and my aching back. Has nothing to do with metro. Fuckers...aaarrrggghhh!!!!
 

resinryder

Rubbing my glands together
Veteran
Follow me with this-
Metro is the one responsible for the "For profit" classification
metro is responsible for the No Grow amendment
Is metro thinking that the fed gov will swoop in and be more likely to shut down for profit dispensaries, stop the growing, and thus, shutting down the mmj program in Nevada? This is something they have wanted to do since we voted it into law.
 

MangoCat

Member
I'm sure they would love if it turned out that way. Metro called in the Feds to raid the dispensaries a couple of years ago, so why not again. I think it's sport for them to screw with us. It all supports their budget too; so there's the bottom line. Less work, mo money. Oink.
 

Arthritis_sucks

The Dude
Veteran
Follow me with this-
Metro is the one responsible for the "For profit" classification
metro is responsible for the No Grow amendment
Is metro thinking that the fed gov will swoop in and be more likely to shut down for profit dispensaries, stop the growing, and thus, shutting down the mmj program in Nevada? This is something they have wanted to do since we voted it into law.

hammer on the nail, i said it from the start. Only time will tell with these snakes.
 
Last edited:

Hydrosun

I love my life
Veteran
RR who were the NO voters in the senate? I want to know about someone who may possibly be a good guy (and find their friends in the assembly).

:joint:
 

MangoCat

Member
The No voters were old school prohibitionists who voted No because "marihuana ist eeevil, we have Marinol and Obama no likee."
 
Top