danut
Member
Lately I've learned about the different pathways that the raw compounds take through our bodies in contrast to the cooked form.
In simple terms, the raw form that exists within the plant has a CO2 stuck in it. That CO2 pops off with the application of heat.
Example: THC talks to the CB1 and CB2 receptors. Yet it talks very little to the GPR55 receptor. The raw form talks to the GPR55 receptor but very little to the CB1 or CB2 receptors.
My point in this thread is that many times publications don't differ. They don't identify if they are talking about the raw or cooked form.
Given the different routes the two forms use within our bodies, this is information that is critical. And may have been lost due to sloppy reporting and observations.
They are NOT interchangeable.
In simple terms, the raw form that exists within the plant has a CO2 stuck in it. That CO2 pops off with the application of heat.
Example: THC talks to the CB1 and CB2 receptors. Yet it talks very little to the GPR55 receptor. The raw form talks to the GPR55 receptor but very little to the CB1 or CB2 receptors.
My point in this thread is that many times publications don't differ. They don't identify if they are talking about the raw or cooked form.
Given the different routes the two forms use within our bodies, this is information that is critical. And may have been lost due to sloppy reporting and observations.
They are NOT interchangeable.