What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Ron Paul 2012!!! Your thoughts on who we should pick for our "Cause"?

Status
Not open for further replies.

itisme

Active member
Veteran
Newt: id love to "hang out" with my wife in the white house.

i fucking died laughing!

Yeah I caught that one too!
Typical Newt, I'm the shit so bow while I get head in the Oval Office.
I'm renaming the White House, from now on it will be the House that Newt Built......
Hell I balanced the budget when Regan was in office......
Now I will only do it if you elect me :D President Heaven sent
 

busyman623

New member
Smearing...Paul disagrees with "giving money" to ANYONE....he is 100% against corruption...and THAT is why he will NEVER be president...

His whole thing is....let the states decide what the laws should be on non critical issues (drug policies ect)shrink the government to only essential programs...reduce military presence throughout the world...literally bring our troops home...stop sending all of our money overseas...

That isn't good for the status quo.....the industrial military complex is the most politically powerful "thing" in the world...

Corporations make HUGE dollars from war......and those corporations spend lots and lots of money in washington making sure war is always either happening or about to happen...

I'm by no means a political expert but I'm smart enough to know that money makes the decisions in this country...and Ron Paul will get downplayed on fox news because he actually wants to do what others just talk about to get votes...

Liberal media will shut him out because he's hyper conservative....(fiscally anyway).....

I consider myself a liberal.....here's the problem...

lib·er·al   [lib-er-uhl, lib-ruhl] Show IPA
adjective
1.
favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2.
( often initial capital letter ) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3.
of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism.
4.
favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5.
favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.

Now I don't know about u...but those definitions sound pretty good to me?

The problem is people in this country hear the word liberal and they think....socialism....or...pussy....

When in reality Liberalism is EVERYTHING we ALL should want....I take "progress" in that definition to mean "more freedom"......because right now in this country....we are very very far from free.

IMO the whole liberal and conservative shit needs to be put to bed....I promise u if u take 50 republicans and 50 dems......atleast 80-90% of the dems will agree with the republicans on atleast 1 issue....

Another funny thing is Democracy...

de·moc·ra·cy   [dih-mok-ruh-see] Show IPA
noun, plural -cies.
1.
government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.
2.
a state having such a form of government: The United States and Canada are democracies.
3.
a state of society characterized by formal equality of rights and privileges.
4.
political or social equality; democratic spirit.
5.
the common people of a community as distinguished from any privileged class; the common people with respect to their political power.

That sounds wonderful right? but in reality we don't live in a democracy...we live in a country that is not "goverened by the people"....our country is goverened by people who are bribed by lobbyists.....

The U.S. gov better be careful......some shit is brewing and if something doesn't change soon....change is gonna be forced....good or bad.
I agree , we all need to wake up and see whats happening . Very semilar to Zeitgeist 2007
 
There's another poll up at drudgereport.com about who won the debates last night. Ron Paul is in the lead, with Mittens nipping at his heels. You only get one vote so it may be a fairly accurate. Vote for Freedom!
 

itisme

Active member
Veteran
NOT MY WORK BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS INFORMATIVE:

No matter what the media wants you to believe, It's already a two-man race.
Of the 2,286 total Republican delegates, 1,144 are needed to win nomination.

In five (5) States: Virginia, Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee and Illinois, Gingrich and Santorum are not even on the ballot. That's 564 delegates that they cannot get.

After South Carolina, only 59 delegates have been allocated to the 4 candidates. Mitt Romney has 39 of those. This means Santorum or Gingrich has to pick up 1,144 delegates from the remaining 1,683.

Let's say that Paul only picks up 20% of the total number of delegates--I happen to believe he will do much better--but let's pick 20%. That's 457 delegates for Paul. Add that to the 564 that Newt and Santorum won't have a shot at and now there are 1,021 delegates that Santorum and Gingrich have no chance of getting. Subtract that 1,021 from the total 2,286 and you're left with 1,265 delegates. That means that Gingrich and Santorum, one or the other, have to pick up over 90% of the available delegates to get the nomination. So, essentially, we're down to Paul and Romney.

A vote for Gingrich and Santorum is a wasted vote!

A vote for Paul is not a wasted vote and may well mean that the next President of the United States will be a man that, for the last 30 years, has never broken a promise, compromised his principles or waffled his position on an issue. A man that still believes that the Constitution of the United States is THE law of the land and that the protection of our individual liberties is the primary reason for the Federal government.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/26/reporters-notebook-ron-paul-effect/#comment#ixzz1kfkRW0O0


There's another poll up at drudgereport.com about who won the debates last night. Ron Paul is in the lead, with Mittens nipping at his heels. You only get one vote so it may be a fairly accurate. Vote for Freedom!

It was 220,000 votes so it is invalid....They will promote one with 54 votes that says Romney or Stinkybitch won.
 
Without a doubt, they always promote the polls they want, but at the same time readers who take the poll can see the results as they come in. Dr Paul nearly always wins the polls I see online, so it clearly shows at least heavy support for him amongst those who use the Internet, where information and opinions are more free than MSM.

Santorum and Gingrich, if they were honest, would drop out of the race.
 

whodare

Active member
Veteran
Without a doubt, they always promote the polls they want, but at the same time readers who take the poll can see the results as they come in. Dr Paul nearly always wins the polls I see online, so it clearly shows at least heavy support for him amongst those who use the Internet, where information and opinions are more free than MSM.

Santorum and Gingrich, if they were honest, would drop out of the race.

the "controllers" wouldnt allow that as it would give Paul a significantly better chance than he has now and it would force the debate to be a legitimate forum for discussion of policy beliefs...
 

SpasticGramps

Don't Drone Me, Bro!
ICMag Donor
Veteran
CNN actually gave Paul a decent amount of time this time. I was pleased. He was even able to have a couple of back and forths with the other candidates. He was really able to get his CONSERVATIVE non-interventionist philosophy across. The other Neo-Con Progressives regurgitated their typical narrative.

Good debate in all. I'm curious to see how Paul does in FL. I reckon this is going to go on for a while which is great.
 
Last edited:

itisme

Active member
Veteran
It is the Establisment hard at work. Inside the prison-house we only see the shadows on the walls.

Plato, The Allegory of the Cave
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQfRdl3GTw4

[Socrates] This entire allegory, I said, you may now append, dear Glaucon, to the previous argument; the prison-house is the world of sight, the light of the fire is the sun, and you will not misapprehend me if you interpret the journey upwards to be the ascent of the soul into the intellectual world according to my poor belief, which, at your desire, I have expressed whether rightly or wrongly God knows. But, whether true or false, my opinion is that in the world of knowledge the idea of good appears last of all, and is seen only with an effort; and, when seen, is also inferred to be the universal author of all things beautiful and right, parent of light and of the lord of light in this visible world, and the immediate source of reason and truth in the intellectual; and that this is the power upon which he who would act rationally, either in public or private life must have his eye fixed.

the above is from: http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/allegory.html
 
Last edited:

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
*** NBC/WSJ poll… All three Republicans negative: The most important item in the NBC/WSJ poll was that all three Republican candidates are a net-negative when it comes to favorability. Romney was exposed in two ways in the poll – (1) he has a conservative problem staring him right in the face. That hasn’t changed. Any time base conservatives -- very conservative voters, Tea Partiers, Southerners, feels there’s a viable alternative to Romney, they rally around that person; we’ve seen this phenomenon for months. And (2) The primary has done damage to Romney. He cannot afford a long primary. If this thing goes to June, that would be very problematic. He’s already in a bad position. George W. Bush, John McCain, and Bob Dole were all in primary fights and ALL were a net-POSITIVE at this time in the election cycle. In the past 20 years in the poll, no one who went on to be the major party nominee of either party with a net-negative at this point – except John Kerry, and we all know how that turned out. Clearly, Romney is looking like he’s getting his momentum back, but he has fundamental problems for the general. The primary has done him no good. (Here’s our story on the poll, how the candidate match up with Obama, and the GOP brand problem.)

from one major network that refuses to acknowledge Dr. Paul...
unfuckingbelievable.
 

itisme

Active member
Veteran
Kinda glad I live in a small town.

Five black helicopters conduct special ops in LA
Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
January 26, 2012
Video was captured last night of five military helicopters buzzing over downtown LA, conducting what the LAPD has described as a special ops urban warfare drill.
The footage, captured by CBS Los Angeles, shows a huge Black Hawk helicopter hovering over the US bank building along with four other OH-6 choppers, known as “Little Birds”.
CBS reporters noted seeing the Black Hawk conduct a drop off in a nearby park before taking to the sky above LA again.
The helicopters, staged at Dodger Stadium throughout the exercise, were later spotted flying low over the Staples Center as the LA Lakers played inside.
Watch the footage below:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/video-m...-covert-exercises-over-u-s-bank-building.html
 
Last edited:

SacredBreh

Member
^^^^^HHHMMMMMMmmmmmmm......

^^^^^HHHMMMMMMmmmmmmm......

Oh, I am sure it is just preparation for say deployment in an Iranian city with skyscrapers, parks, and sports stadiums.:blowbubbles:Just watch the pretty bubbles.

Not even going to say it..........

Peace
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top