What's new

Incredible Results: Dyna Gro recipe

otherwise I'd have probably given it up due to operator error and the lack of cartoons on the labels...

@Homebrewer-- ROFL!!!

That is some funny shit right there bro, I dont care who you are!!! PRICELESS!!
 
T

TREE KING

i know dyna- grow has better results vs connoisseur alone because homebrewer ran the tests and most likely sensi 2 part because connoisseur is an's top of the line nute. has anyone ran a test with sensi 2 part bloom with the bid bud overdrive combo vs dyna-grow? than would be the most important comparison i would love to see cause if im using an than theres no way im not using big bud and overdrive. i know what you guys are thinking, why dont i just run the test myself. im still in the middle of a long process to find my mother plant so every crop right now i got different phenos that im running so it would be a while till i could run the test.

has anyone did this comparison? if so i would love to hear about the results
 

Sam the Caveman

Good'n Greasy
Veteran
When I first started growing I used dyna-grow, but I switched to dutchmasters and the plants were happier in veg and larger yields in flowering.
 

Homebrewer

Active member
Veteran
i know dyna- grow has better results vs connoisseur alone because homebrewer ran the tests and most likely sensi 2 part because connoisseur is an's top of the line nute. has anyone ran a test with sensi 2 part bloom with the bid bud overdrive combo vs dyna-grow? than would be the most important comparison i would love to see cause if im using an than theres no way im not using big bud and overdrive.

I used koolbloom and hydroplex in the comparison grow, there is nothing about big bud or overdirve themselves that would have made the results any different.

i know what you guys are thinking, why dont i just run the test myself. im still in the middle of a long process to find my mother plant so every crop right now i got different phenos that im running so it would be a while till i could run the test.

You've got a lot of issues to work though before you go comparing nutrient brands. You'll get there though.
 

dizzlekush

Member
I have precipitated solids in the bottom of my 1 Gallon Dyna-Gro Foliage-Pro and Bloom containers as well as white floaties in my Dyna Gro Pro-Tekt. my plants always did really well on dyna, but i was not happy how the products acted in the container and stopped using them after precipitates kept forming.

Anyone else had the same issus with dyna? im really not surprised that their liquid complete nutrients solidified with how concentrated they are and how the Ca P and S is all in one container, but i expected the Pro-Tekt to last at least 2 years, where it was more like 8 months.
 
T

TREE KING

homebrewer i dont understand what your saying, your saying big bud and overdrive do nothing? how can you say the results wouldnt of been different? dynagrow probably would of still won but im just sayin
 

dizzlekush

Member
homebrewer i dont understand what your saying, your saying big bud and overdrive do nothing? how can you say the results wouldnt of been different? dynagrow probably would of still won but im just sayin

Homebrewer is pretty much right, except im not sure if the products he uses contain citric acid, which is in both Big Bud and Overdrive, and helps keep phosphorous soluble. not that that makes them worth it, i bought 5 lbs of pure citric acid at the local brewery for ~$16.
 
T

TREE KING

Homebrewer is pretty much right, except im not sure if the products he uses contain citric acid, which is in both Big Bud and Overdrive, and helps keep phosphorous soluble. not that that makes them worth it, i bought 5 lbs of pure citric acid at the local brewery for ~$16.

so youve used big bud and overdrive and they do nothing? im just curious cause alot of people say they love those products
 

Homebrewer

Active member
Veteran
I have precipitated solids in the bottom of my 1 Gallon Dyna-Gro Foliage-Pro and Bloom containers as well as white floaties in my Dyna Gro Pro-Tekt. my plants always did really well on dyna, but i was not happy how the products acted in the container and stopped using them after precipitates kept forming.

Anyone else had the same issus with dyna? im really not surprised that their liquid complete nutrients solidified with how concentrated they are and how the Ca P and S is all in one container, but i expected the Pro-Tekt to last at least 2 years, where it was more like 8 months.
I always have a few chunks in the bottom of my bloom bottle but it's never been an issue in regards to performance or an expected EC contribution. Apparently this can happen at cooler temps. Beers in green bottles are kind of the same way in that they're often times light-struck or 'skunked' but they're not coming out of the fermenter that way. You can thank the distributor for that.

homebrewer i dont understand what your saying, your saying big bud and overdrive do nothing? how can you say the results wouldnt of been different? dynagrow probably would of still won but im just sayin

I can tell you don't know what I'm saying because I never said XXX product doesn't do anything ;). I said that I used products of similar mineral makeups in their place. Bloom boosters shouldn't make up more than 15-20% of your total EC anyways so what exactly is the ever-so-slight variation in salts going to do in the end? It certainly wouldn't have yielded 4-5 more ounces per flood table which was the difference in yield between DynaGro and Connoisseur.
 
T

TREE KING

I always have a few chunks in the bottom of my bloom bottle but it's never been an issue in regards to performance or an expected EC contribution. Apparently this can happen at cooler temps. Beers in green bottles are kind of the same way in that they're often times light-struck or 'skunked' but they're not coming out of the fermenter that way. You can thank the distributor for that.



I can tell you don't know what I'm saying because I never said XXX product doesn't do anything ;). I said that I used products of similar mineral makeups in their place. Bloom boosters shouldn't make up more than 15-20% of your total EC anyways so what exactly is the ever-so-slight variation in salts going to do in the end? It certainly wouldn't have yielded 4-5 more ounces per flood table which was the difference in yield between DynaGro and Connoisseur.

o wait you used koolbloom and hydroplex with sensi 2 part bloom? i didnt know what hydroplex was i thought that was some sort of base nutrients that you used with koolbloom.

if you used those with sensi 2 part did you see an increase in yield when using the extra products? is so how much?
 

Anti

Sorcerer's Apprentice
Veteran
I started growing with Dyna Gro and I used it for awhile before switching to FNB for awhile and now I'm growing with maxibloom + protekt.

I am satisfied with my dyna Gro results, but every bottle I've had had solids dropping out of suspension to the point that it sounds like a box of rocks when you shake it up.

An awful lot of new members finding this thread before any other and singing the praises of Dyna gro?

Seem fishy to anyone but me?
 

Homebrewer

Active member
Veteran
o wait you used koolbloom and hydroplex with sensi 2 part bloom? i didnt know what hydroplex was i thought that was some sort of base nutrients that you used with koolbloom.

if you used those with sensi 2 part did you see an increase in yield when using the extra products? is so how much?
PM me if you have questions as brand X vs brand Y comparisons probably wasn't the point of this thread to begin with.
 

dizzlekush

Member
so youve used big bud and overdrive and they do nothing? im just curious cause alot of people say they love those products

Ive used both Big Bud and Overdrive with the Sensi line. i got better results with dyna gro, and im getting equally impressive results running Jacks Professional now.
 
T

TREE KING

Ive used both Big Bud and Overdrive with the Sensi line. i got better results with dyna gro, and im getting equally impressive results running Jacks Professional now.

yesss! thats what i like to hear. you definitely got me exited to run dyna-grow. i just cant do it yet cause im getting alot better at dialing in the sensi 2 part plus moneys tight. if i switch now its a risk at doing something wrong and destroying a crop. a couple more crops then im switching thanks dizzle
 
1

187020

Protekt has a sperm-like jizz quality straight from the bottle, like your third spent load of the night. Peace
 

dizzlekush

Member
yesss! thats what i like to hear. you definitely got me exited to run dyna-grow. i just cant do it yet cause im getting alot better at dialing in the sensi 2 part plus moneys tight. if i switch now its a risk at doing something wrong and destroying a crop. a couple more crops then im switching thanks dizzle

just two things. dyna is formulated for soil use. this means its lacking in secondary nutrients (Ca, Mg, S). Dyna offers Mag-Pro to supplement if using soil-less or hydro/aero, which i personally dont like. i suggest using epsom salts and a Cal Mag product, "CALiMAGic" is the best.

Instead of using Dyna Grow (7-9-5) for the vegetative part of your grow, try using Foliage Pro (9-3-6) instead, it is a much better formulation for cannabis.

By the way, it was homebrewer at rollitup that got me to try dyna, he might remember me repping Advanced Nutrients pretty hard on RIU a long time ago, he called me on the bs and suggested dyna. then much later i came back and apologized and thanked him for getting me to try dyna. Uncle Ben and learning about plant nutrition also helped. Dyna is the best value there is when it comes to liquid nutrients, except for maybe Hesi.
 
T

TREE KING

just two things. dyna is formulated for soil use. this means its lacking in secondary nutrients (Ca, Mg, S). Dyna offers Mag-Pro to supplement if using soil-less or hydro/aero, which i personally dont like. i suggest using epsom salts and a Cal Mag product, "CALiMAGic" is the best.

Instead of using Dyna Grow (7-9-5) for the vegetative part of your grow, try using Foliage Pro (9-3-6) instead, it is a much better formulation for cannabis.

By the way, it was homebrewer at rollitup that got me to try dyna, he might remember me repping Advanced Nutrients pretty hard on RIU a long time ago, he called me on the bs and suggested dyna. then much later i came back and apologized and thanked him for getting me to try dyna. Uncle Ben and learning about plant nutrition also helped. Dyna is the best value there is when it comes to liquid nutrients, except for maybe Hesi.

see now thats the thing i dont like. even homebrewer says you gotta use grow with the bloom cause sometimes the plants dont stay green in flower. so pretty much its not a one part cause you gotta use grow, bloom, and mag-pro. so lets say i do a 30/70 grow/bloom ratio in flower. what percentage of mag pro would i use? also just to point out homebrewer likes the grow better than foliage pro for veg
 

Homebrewer

Active member
Veteran
even homebrewer says you gotta use grow with the bloom cause sometimes the plants dont stay green in flower. so pretty much its not a one part cause you gotta use grow, bloom, and mag-pro. so lets say i do a 30/70 grow/bloom ratio in flower. what percentage of mag pro would i use? also just to point out homebrewer likes the grow better than foliage pro for veg

I use grow and bloom together in flower because I use magpro and I feel like Magpro adds too much P relative to N during flower. There is a guy named burrr at another forum who only uses bloom and protekt in flower and has green plants plants from start to finish. One part, two part, call it what you will but you'll need grow and bloom regardless of how you chose feed during the flowering stage.

just two things. dyna is formulated for soil use. this means its lacking in secondary nutrients (Ca, Mg, S). Dyna offers Mag-Pro to supplement if using soil-less or hydro/aero, which i personally dont like. i suggest using epsom salts and a Cal Mag product, "CALiMAGic" is the best.

What makes you say this? According to DG, Magpro is for people who use RO water but even when I've not used magpro, the plants didn't show signs of deficiency. The bases are light on sulfur though but that element has a more aesthetic role, IMO.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top