What's new

Occupy Wall Street: Not on major media but worth watching!

Status
Not open for further replies.

bs0

Active member
you left out one critical element..


you see joe gets the 28,500 "prebated spending"
cutting his 18% down to about 7%


AND
he gets to keep his entire paycheck instead of lending it to uncle sam..
allowing him to actually build savings.

now in your scenario joe makes 50 loans uncle sam 5 and spends 45 to live.
joe don't get to save...


way to keep the poor from ever getting ahead...

To account for the 'credit', just keep scaling it. If 'oprah' from my example makes 3 million, she now would be paying less tax than your 'joe'.
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
there is your lack of understanding..

the "credit" does not scale up.

it is indexed to pov+20%.

oprah gets the same.

only 28K means a lot more to joe.
 

bs0

Active member
bso:

do you believe there should be some sort of maximum personal income limit?

No.

But I do think that of those who have reaped great benefit from our country and society it can be expected that they pay a higher taxation rate than the people who don't.
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
No.

But I do think that of those who have reaped great benefit from our country and society it can be expected that they pay a higher taxation rate than the people who don't.

when they buy multi million dollar homes and private jets they will ;)
 

bs0

Active member
there is your lack of understanding..

the "credit" does not scale up.

it is indexed to pov+20%.

oprah gets the same.

only 28K means a lot more to joe.

Keep scaling my *example* not the credit.

There's a reason that whenever 'flat tax' is brought up everyone says how it's skewed against the middle class and the poor.

But, whatever, you obviously think that people should pay no tax if possible. I think that society needs things like roads, bridges, and protection for the old the sick and the poor. That's your prerogative.
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
www.fairtax.org

read first..

no one is talking about the flat tax.

imported purchases are actually subject to higher rates.

the fair tax actually would generate more revenue for "roads, bridges, and protection for the old the sick and the poor"

granted you cant import a house...

http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/MacroeconomicAnalysisofFairTax.pdf
http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/FairTax_on_American_manufacturing.pdf


Top ten reasons why Democrats should strongly support the FairTaxSM
Reason 1: The FairTax meets the entire Democratic tax agenda, starting with
progressivity. The FairTax is far more progressive than the current income tax system. Under
the FairTax, low-income households experience five times the benefit increase as compared to
high-income households. And a switch to the FairTax causes real wages to rise.
Source: Jokisch, Sabine and Laurence J. Kotlikoff, “Simulating the Dynamic Macroeconomic and Microeconomic
Effects of the FairTax,” NBER Working Paper No. 11858, December, 2005 and Kotlikoff, Laurence J. and David
Rapson, “Comparing Average and Marginal Tax Rates under the FairTax and the Current System of Federal
Taxation,” NBER Working Paper No. 12533, Revised October 2006. Available at
http://people.bu.edu/kotlikoff/Simulating the Dynamic Macroeconomic, October 4, 2006.pdf.
Reason 2: The FairTax eliminates the highly regressive tax on wages of the working poor
and middle class. The FairTax removes the single most regressive element (the payroll tax) for
wage earners. Payroll taxes are currently imposed on the first $97,500 of earnings but drop
steeply to only a few percent above that amount. The FairTax repeals this unfair tax and allows
wage earners to keep their entire paycheck. According to Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of
Labor, “Everyone hates taxes, but the payroll tax has got to be the worst. Four out of five
American workers pay more in payroll taxes than they do in income taxes. The payroll tax is also
regressive as hell -- poorer workers pay proportionately more than richer ones.”
Source: Reich, Robert B., “Whose Tax Cuts?” The American Prospect, Volume 13, Issue No. 22, December 16,
2002. Available at http://www.prospect.org/print/V13/22/reich-r.html and HR 25.
Reason 3: The FairTax is the only plan that completely untaxes the poor. Even a person
with a zero percent income tax rate today must pay payroll taxes on the first dollar they earn and
also pay hidden federal taxes in the prices of everything they buy. The FairTax removes these
hidden taxes, eliminates the payroll tax, and holds all taxpayers harmless against any taxes on
essentials such as food, clothing, and shelter.
Source: “The Prebate Explained,” Americans For Fair Taxation White Paper. Available at
http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/FairTaxPrebateExplained2007.pdf.
Reason 4: The FairTax stops the export of jobs. Our income tax favors imports over U.S.
production by exempting imports from U.S. tax, and we penalize U.S. exports by allowing
foreign nations to impose taxes when our goods enter their shores. This adds up to an average 17
percent price advantage over U.S. produced goods, which greatly depresses U.S. exports and
costs us jobs. The FairTax stops this abuse by taxing all goods consumed in the U.S. alike and
untaxing exports.
Source: “Hausman Study Shows Distortions in International Trading System Hurting U.S. Manufacturers: An
Economic Analysis of WTO Rules on Border Adjustability of Taxes,” May 2006. Available at
http://www.standupforsteel.org/hausman.html.
Top ten reasons why Democrats should strongly support the FairTax
© 2007 Americans For Fair Taxation. All rights reserved.
Page 2 of 2
Reason 5: The FairTax untaxes education. The FairTax rewards education and upward
mobility in the simplest and most powerful way: It eliminates tuition from all federal taxation.
This allows individuals to apply their whole paycheck to tuition before any taxes are taken out.
Source: “Why the FairTax is good for young and low-income families,” Americans For Fair Taxation White Paper.
Available at http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/FairTaxIsGoodForYoungAndLowIncomeFamilies.pdf and HR 25.
Reason 6: The FairTax is the only plan that targets and taxes existing wealth, not the fruits
of labor. The FairTax will tax every dollar of accumulated wealth in the most efficient way
possible – when it is spent. Tax shelters, loopholes, or other gimmicks to shield large wealth
from taxation will be a thing of the past.
Source: Kotlikoff, Laurence J., “The Case for the FairTax,” The Wall Street Journal, March 7, 2005, page A18.
Reason 7: The FairTax boosts the real growth and prosperity of the U.S. Independent
research studies confirm the powerful economic effects. Beacon Hill Institute predicts that real
GDP would be 10.3 percent higher in just four years under the FairTax. Laurence Kotlikoff,
Ph.D., predicts the capital stock to be 12.8 percent higher by 2010 and 43.7 percent higher by
2030, leading to real wages that would be 11.5 percent higher in 2030 than otherwise would be
the case if the current tax system remained in place.
Source: Tuerck, David, et al., “The Economic Effects of the FairTax: Results from the Beacon Hill Institute CGE
Model,” The Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University, February 2007 and Jokisch and Kotlikoff, “Simulating the
Dynamic Macroeconomic and Microeconomic Effects of the FairTax,” September 2006. Available at
http://people.bu.edu/kotlikoff/Simulating the Dynamic Macroeconomic, October 4, 2006.pdf.
Reason 8: The FairTax is revenue neutral. The FairTax, at a 23 percent tax rate, raises the
same amount of money for the federal government as today’s income tax system. This means
that steep budget cuts are not required to pass meaningful tax reform.
Source: Bachman, Paul, Jonathan Haughton, Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Alfonso Sanchez-Penalver, and David G.
Tuerck, “Taxing Sales Under the FairTax: What Rate Works?” Beacon Hill Institute, published in Tax Notes,
November 13, 2006. Available at
http://www.beaconhill.org/FairTax2006/TaxingSalesundertheFairTaxWhatRateWorks061005.pdf.
Reason 9: The FairTax promotes the American Dream. The FairTax makes home
ownership more affordable because used homes are totally untaxed, and three out of four
homebuyers buy used homes. For new and used homes, the FairTax does not tax the earnings
used to pay mortgages, interest rates will be far lower under the FairTax, and a homebuyer can
save for a down payment faster than under current law.
Source: “Promoting home ownership: How the FairTax’s benefits for homeowners exceed the mortgage interest
deduction,” Americans For Fair Taxation White Paper. Available at
http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/PromotingHomeOwnership.pdf.
Reason 10: The FairTax is not a political slogan. FairTax.org is nonpartisan. Our broken tax
system hurts every American, and it will take leaders from all parts of the political spectrum to
fix it.
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran
this is the first poster..

Originally Posted by T_B_M
Seriously? A bunch of complainers having sit-ins is going to accomplish something? I think not. In Egypt and other places with uprisings, they use rocks, fists, guns, and whatever they can find. These assbags look like hipster douchebags who have no idea what a revolution is.
rocks, fists, guns - vs - bunch of complainers
i really wish people would stop comparing this




to this...


Lol, looks like T_B_M is saying there's no comparison.

here is DB saying you dont want OWS to escalate to that level of violence
DiscoBiscuit said:
The Egyptian uprising was largely peaceful. Most of the violence was perpetrated by Mubarek loyalists.

Nope, letting the guy know Egyptian violence was largely attributed to a particular faction of loyalists. ZERO comparison to OWS.

Looks like english isn't your primary language.

dude you just want to argue i think...

Lol. If you weren't arguing you wouldn't have any posts.
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
nice edit..

why did you cut off the second half where you said:
"You're advocating what spirals into anarchy. You're about as likely to get what you want as you would tearing a c note into pieces and expecting it to grow back together"

the comparison i couldn't point to?
you know OWS to arab spring/egypt
it's all over.
add context of rocks and rolls at your leisure.

dude once again your just reaching for argument's sake.

we both believe the comparison is erroneous correct?
and we both believe we dont want that type of thing here no?
obviously we agree obama is no mubarak.

so what exactly are you arguing?
 

krunchbubble

Dear Haters, I Have So Much More For You To Be Mad
Veteran
i read or watched something the other day that said that the average worker works 3-4 months of the year, JUST to pay the taxes for the year.......
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
thats tax freedom day..
the day you break even.

http://www.mytaxfreedomday.com/

now with the progressive income tax jan 1 is tax freedom day for a lot of the "1%" because of all the shelters and loopholes.
eliminate the income tax and everyone pays their fair share..

4-28 <<--- my tax freedom day
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran
i read or watched something the other day that said that the average worker works 3-4 months of the year, JUST to pay the taxes for the year.......

Yup, taxes and FICA. Social Security and Medicare deductions are part of income taxes known as 'payroll taxes'. The lower middle class and working poor get a temporary break on income taxes but still have to pay payroll taxes.

IMO what's interesting is our revenues are 1950s levels. Unless you're in the top 1% our (federal) tax rate probably hasn't fluctuated more than a couple of points. Compare that to the top where income has spiraled and taxes have lowered from 91% to as little as ~17%.
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran
68% pay nothing. The last 30 years has made the progressive aspect moot for those who don't have to pay.

The top doesn't have to pay income tax rates at all. They can arrange deferred compensation through their corporations and the 35% income tax rate becomes 15% cap gain rate.

And that's just money that gets reported. As many as 20,000 US tax shelter accounts in Switzerland alone. Lobbyists are busy pushing free trade with Panama because Cayman Islands ain't big enough to hide all their tax free money.
 
I

In~Plain~Site

Red Herrings abound...91% you say?

I wonder how many actually paid that, we should make that current rate available to Warren and the boys...seeing as how THEY want to pay more taxes.

If you believe that
 

Dudesome

Active member
Veteran
Howcome everyone says corporations aren't people? Are they government? no...
Corporations ARE people. ... with privileges...
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran
Red Herrings abound...91% you say?

History of federal income tax

The Federal income tax rates in the United States have varied widely since 1913. For example, in 1954 the Congress imposed a Federal income tax on individuals, with the tax imposed in layers of 24 income brackets at tax rates ranging from 20% to 91% (for a chart, see Internal Revenue Code of 1954). Here is a partial history of changes in the U.S. Federal income tax rates for individuals (and the income brackets) since 1913:[28]

I wonder how many actually paid that
Nobody made that argument except you.

we should make that current rate available to Warren and the boys...seeing as how THEY want to pay more taxes.

If you believe that
Believe whatever you wish

Millionaires Support Warren Buffett’s Tax on the Rich

A new survey from Spectrem Group found that 68% of millionaires (those with investments of $1 million or more) support raising taxes on those with $1 million or more in income. Fully 61% of those with net worths of $5 million or more support the tax on million-plus earners.

http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2011/10...ort-warren-buffetts-tax-on-the-rich/?mod=e2tw

:laughing:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top