What's new

Occupy Wall Street: Not on major media but worth watching!

Status
Not open for further replies.

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
haha what's a rube? :D

Reuben Garrett Lucius Goldberg (July 4, 1883 – December 7, 1970) was an American cartoonist, sculptor, author, engineer and inventor.

Goldberg's father was a San Francisco police and fire commissioner, who encouraged the young Reuben to pursue a career in engineering. Rube graduated from the University of California, Berkeley in 1904 with a College of Mining degree[1] and was hired by the city of San Francisco as an engineer for the Water and Sewers Department. After six months he resigned his position with the city to join the San Francisco Chronicle where he became a sports cartoonist.[1] The following year, he took a job with the San Francisco Bulletin, where he remained until he moved to New York City in 1907.

Goldberg drew cartoons for five newspapers, including the New York Evening Journal and the New York Evening Mail. His work entered syndication in 1915, beginning his nationwide popularity. He was syndicated by the McNaught Syndicate from 1922 until 1934.

A prolific artist, Goldberg produced several cartoon series simultaneously, including Mike and Ike (They Look Alike), Boob McNutt, Foolish Questions, Lala Palooza and The Weekly Meeting of the Tuesday Women's Club. The cartoons that brought him lasting fame involved a character named Professor Lucifer Gorgonzola Butts. In that series, Goldberg drew labeled schematics of the comical "inventions" that would later bear his name.
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
What i find funny is that there is usually underlying belief of the 'the 99% are just too lazy to become the 1%' that has been expressed explicitly in this thread several times.

you missed the post completely..

no one was suggesting "laziness" only applauding a poster for not being swindled by the evil banks forcing people to borrow their money.
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran
you missed the post completely..

no one was suggesting "laziness" only applauding a poster for not being swindled by the evil banks forcing people to borrow their money.

Lol. Speaking of missed it, you absolute others' input so live with it. Hugged yer crooked banker today?
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
Lol. Speaking of missed it, you absolute others' input so live with it. Hugged yer crooked banker today?
yawn.sflb


ssdd...

SYNTAX ERROR: NO CONTENT FOUND
 

Dudesome

Active member
Veteran
I'd vote for comical.

why thank you :D

btw what do you mean by the crooked banker?

What banks are you guys talking about all this time?

Because when people are talking about banks they should distinguish

There are:

Centralbanks(like FED in US)

Investment Banks(JPM, Citi, GS, Wellsfargo,morgan stanley)

Hedgefunds(numerous) are also considered to be banks

And just those smalltime commercial banks of which there are many and which are often monopolized by Investment banks.


now if you want to put the blame on anyone you will wanna leave most commercial banks alone.

Centralbanks arent really banks. Just the currency printing machines controlled by the elites of this world.

That leaves us with the only shadowbanks known today:

Investment banks
and
Hedgefunds


Now those are the banks you will want to put blame on for alot of terrible things on this planet. They are also the tools of CBs to do their evil deeds.
 

rootfingers

Active member
It's not about putting the blame on people or banks or any of that. It is about creating a more fair system all around. You and your nonsense dude I swear.
 

Dudesome

Active member
Veteran
It's not about putting the blame on people or banks or any of that. It is about creating a more fair system all around. You and your nonsense dude I swear.

jesus :D is it the same rootfinger I spoke with just like an hour ago :D


actually putting a blame is somewhat healthy to realize who is responsible for what. Otherwise how can we create a "fair system", when another system is dominating? We need to destroy the old system first.
To destroy it we need to study it, to answer the question "how?".
 

Green lung

Active member
Veteran
Goldman sacks of shit is the enemy here

Every bank that takes in profit from people is the enemy

Every politician that accepts money from wallstreet is the enemy

My sativa told me so...

I'm just relieved that Ows wasn't some shit just for a week then dissipated.



I noticed DAG jumped right on to this guy/strawman.


Clever tactic Dag:tiphat:
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran
why thank you :D

btw what do you mean by the crooked banker?

What banks are you guys talking about all this time?

Because when people are talking about banks they should distinguish

There are:

Centralbanks(like FED in US)

Investment Banks(JPM, Citi, GS, Wellsfargo,morgan stanley)

Hedgefunds(numerous) are also considered to be banks

And just those smalltime commercial banks of which there are many and which are often monopolized by Investment banks.


now if you want to put the blame on anyone you will wanna leave most commercial banks alone.

Centralbanks arent really banks. Just the currency printing machines controlled by the elites of this world.

That leaves us with the only shadowbanks known today:

Investment banks
and
Hedgefunds


Now those are the banks you will want to put blame on for alot of terrible things on this planet. They are also the tools of CBs to do their evil deeds.

Crooked bankers works for me.
 

rootfingers

Active member
I am not blaming anyone, I just state the truth and hold people accountable.

The following is taken from an article from the web, google it if you wish. Pertains to a part of the Obama jobs bill republicans lock-step opposed because it would have taxed people making over a million 0.5-0.7% after the first million -

The 50-50 vote came in relation to a motion to simply take up the bill and fell well short of the 60 needed to break a filibuster. Democrats Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Independent Joe Lieberman of Connecticut broke with Obama on the vote. Two Democrats who voted with the president, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Jon Tester of Montana, however, said they couldn't support the underlying Obama plan unless it's changed.

Thursday's $35 billion measure combined $30 billion for state and local governments to hire teachers and other school workers with $5 billion to help pay the salaries of police officers, firefighters and other first responders. The White House says the measure would "support" almost 400,000 education jobs for one year. Republicans call that a temporary "sugar high" for the economy.

"We cannot afford to be bailing out local governments, and we can't afford stimulus 2.0," countered Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.

An AP-GfK poll taken Oct. 13-17 found 62 percent of respondents favoring the surcharge as a way to pay for jobs initiatives. Just 26 percent opposed the idea.

"Protecting millionaires and defeating President Obama are more important to my Republican colleagues than creating jobs and getting our economy back on track," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said.
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
TY (i think)

not so much a tactic per se as true incredulity...

i just cant believe people can believe some of the shit they spout...

none of them usually will quantify.

ask them if income should be capped and they say "hell yes"
ask them where the cap should be and they dance a jig...

still not one offer of substantial changes to the regulatory system to make it "fair"

these guys bitch well but ask them to quantify and they wilt...
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran
jesus :D is it the same rootfinger I spoke with just like an hour ago :D


actually putting a blame is somewhat healthy to realize who is responsible for what. Otherwise how can we create a "fair system", when another system is dominating? We need to destroy the old system first.
To destroy it we need to study it, to answer the question "how?".

We'll need a much bigger hole in the head to go back to the 19th century.
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran
TY (i think)

not so much a tactic per se as true incredulity...

i just cant believe people can believe some of the shit they spout...

none of them usually will quantify.

ask them if income should be capped and they say "hell yes"
ask them where the cap should be and they dance a jig...

still not one offer of substantial changes to the regulatory system to make it "fair"

these guys bitch well but ask them to quantify and they wilt...

It's because you construct others' arguments. I haven't seen anybody play you're game, let alone dance.

Nobody needs to quantify anything with a bookend.
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran
No need, rootfingers. 56 pages of input gets the same responses from the same one or two polar opinions. Nazi is just another word.
 

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
It's because you construct others' arguments. I haven't seen anybody play you're game, let alone dance.

Nobody needs to quantify anything with a bookend.

what about a rocking horse?

hey instead of actually discussing the topic at hand lets play
"you are a bad person"

more obfuscation from the peanut gallery...

your shtic is to predictable..

looking for the 'ol cheerleader trifecta.


anyone wanna tackle the question that sets fear into DB's heart?

where should income be capped in the united states?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top