Nirvana_Papaya
Member
- Post removed -
EFFECT: Requires the Department of Health (DOH) to reimburse
qualifying patients for any pizza consumed by the qualifying patient
while he or she was under the influence of medical cannabis.
Requires the DOH to reimburse the patient no later than five
business days after the patient submits a receipt for the pizza.
Prohibits the DOH from reimbursing the patient for delivery charges,
gratuities, or toppings in excess of three. Defines "pizza" as a
pie with a bread crust topped with tomato sauce, cheese, and various
toppings. Clarifies that "pizza" includes Chicago style deep dish,
New York style thin crust, and stuffed crust.
It passed the Senate with the amendment banning the MMJ doctors. I recommend people who got their's at a clinic, if they have to renew yearly, next time they go in (before this new law kicks in), to ask the doctor to make it so their recommendation never expires. This law does not invalidate your recommendation.
19 A qualifying patient or designated
20 provider who is not registered with the registry established in section
21 901 of this act may raise the affirmative defense set forth in
22 subsection (2) of this section, if:
23 (a) The qualifying patient or designated provider presents his or
24 her valid documentation to any peace officer who questions the patient
25 or provider regarding his or her medical use of cannabis;
26 (b) The qualifying patient or designated provider possesses no more
27 cannabis than the limits set forth in RCW 69.51A.040(1);
28 (c) The qualifying patient or designated provider is in compliance
29 with all other terms and conditions of this chapter;
30 (d) The investigating peace officer does not have probable cause to
31 believe that the qualifying patient or designated provider has
32 committed a felony, or is committing a misdemeanor in the officer's
33 presence, that does not relate to the medical use of cannabis;
34 (e) No outstanding warrant for arrest exists for the qualifying
35 patient or designated provider; and
36 (f) The investigating peace officer has not observed evidence of
37 any of the circumstances identified in section 901(4) of this act.
1 (2) A qualifying patient or designated provider who is not
2 registered with the registry established in section 901 of this act,
3 but who presents his or her valid documentation to any peace officer
4 who questions the patient or provider regarding his or her medical use
5 of cannabis, may assert an affirmative defense to charges of violations
6 of state law relating to cannabis through proof at trial, by a
7 preponderance of the evidence, that he or she otherwise meets the
8 requirements of RCW 69.51A.040. A qualifying patient or designated
9 provider meeting the conditions of this subsection but possessing more
10 cannabis than the limits set forth in RCW 69.51A.040(1) may, in the
11 investigating peace officer's discretion, be taken into custody and
12 booked into jail in connection with the investigation of the incident.
we need a few hundred patients to camp out in this guys office said:Fucking a, just send me the date im ready to protest. what a jerkoff..
The only thing I don't really like is the registry. But then again CO, OR, CA, and all the rest have registries and they're doing fine, and those patients don't even have the choice to not be on the list. I really like the fact that we get full protection from arrest/seizure. If you're over your limits they can only confiscate meds/plants to get you down to your max limit and not throw you in a goddamn cage and cut your crop.
It ain't perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than some lame ass "affirmative defense".
Oh yeah, the doctor restrictions suck too, but I'm sure there's more than one way around that.
You are too kind to describe them as "conservatives" -- they're fascists. Real conservatives would support States' Rights, as well as a maximum of rights, liberties, and freedom of each person, with absolute minimal intrusion by the government. The same holds true for business regulations, including the tilting of the "free market" in favor of crony corporations through special interest tax incentives and other corporate welfare.
OTOH, fascism can be defined as preferential government treatment of favored corporate interests, to the benefit of those corporate interests instead of all the citizens under that government's dominion. "Private profit and socialized risk" is one of their maxims. The USA stopped being a constitutional republic infused with small "d" democratic principles about the same time as the rise to power of the Military Industrial Complex and the National Intelligence infrastructure, at the close of World War 2. Over the course of the past 40+ years that trend has been greatly accelerating -- highlighted by the assassinations of JFK, MLK, RFK, the Vietnam Conflict, and Nixon's War on Drugs.