What's new

Thank the Ur-worm for Your Brain

Grat3fulh3ad

The Voice of Reason
Veteran
THE hallmark of the human brain - the thing that sets us apart from all other animals and is presumed to be the source of our intellectual superiority - can be traced back 600 million years to the ancestor of a primitive worm.

The discovery comes from a study of how genes are switched on and off inside brain cells. It suggests that the ancestor of the ragworm already possessed the seed of what would become the cortex. There are also tantalising hints of how, armed with proto-brains, worms could have given rise to the staggering diversity of animals alive today, from millipedes to horseshoe crabs and the great apes.

The cortex is the thick layer of folded brain tissue that gives mammalian brains their distinctive appearance. It is involved in integrating large amounts of information and is responsible for processes such as memory, awareness, thought and language. It is thought that the denser and larger the cortex is relative to body size, the more cognitively advanced is its owner. By this measure humans are crowned kings of the brainiacs.

Now it seems this remarkable structure had its humble beginnings in the primitive brain of a marine worm. Detlev Arendt of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Heidelberg, Germany, studies a species of ragworm called Platynereis dumerilii, which has hardly changed since it first evolved. Just a few centimetres long, it is unusually cerebral for such a primitive animal. "Its brain is more complex than an earthworm's," Arendt says. In particular, it has two unusually large structures - called mushroom bodies - which pull together all the information from the worm's many smell receptors. These mushroom bodies may also be involved in its (admittedly limited) ability to learn.

Although they are similar in function to the cortex, evolutionary biologists have long thought that mushroom bodies evolved separately to this more complex structure.

To test this theory, Arendt and his team looked at 42 genes that play a crucial role in the development of the brain. They used fluorescent markers to tag mushroom body cells where each of the 42 genes was switched on, repeating the tagging throughout every stage of the worm's development.

The team were stunned by the pattern of gene expression they found. Not only was it similar to the one found in mushroom bodies in insect brains, it also resembled the pattern in the complex vertebrate cortex "in shocking detail", says Arendt. What's more, this held true for each stage of development up to adulthood (Cell, vol 142, p 800).

The results are "lovely and very convincing", says Max Telford of University College London. "They show the brain cells forming in the same place, being patterned by the same genes, and performing similar functions."

The odds are extremely low that such a complex genetic pattern evolved twice - once to give rise to simple worm brains, and once to give rise to vertebrate brains. "The simplest explanation is that it only evolved once," says Telford. That suggests Arendt and his team have identified the earliest ancestor of the human cortex.

The implications don't stop there. Arendt and others believe that the emergence of a proto-cortex in early worms was a driver of the Cambrian explosion, the sudden diversification of complex multicellular life, some 530 million years ago.

Ragworms split from the other complex animals around 600 million years ago. Arendt's study suggests that their common ancestor, nicknamed "ur-bilaterian", already had a proto-cortex. This may have given the ur-bilaterian a key advantage.

According to Arendt it would have provided a link between the animal's senses and its muscles. The crucial thing, he says, was "being a predator that smelled something and went for it".

Nicholas Strausfeld of the University of Arizona in Tucson, points out another potential advantage. In vertebrates, the pallium - a precursor to the cortex - develops into a structure called the hippocampus, which is involved in spatial awareness. "It would be a big advantage to have something that told the animal where it was, where it had been, and where it wanted to go," he says.

He points to horseshoe crabs which evolved in the early Cambrian. Every year they come back to spawn on the same bit of beach in Massachusetts, after an underwater journey of many miles. Their sight is poor, so they may rely on smell to navigate - with the help of their mushroom bodies, which are the largest of any invertebrate.

In light of Arendt's findings, the ur-bilaterian may even have had some form of primitive memory, says Tomás Ryan of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Hinxton, UK. "It was probably capable of most of the things modern insects can do," he says.

All this is speculation for now, but what seems clear is that the seed for what would eventually give us the likes of da Vinci and Darwin was planted inside a tiny worm, 600 million years ago.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727774.100-thank-the-urworm-for-shakespeares-brain.html
 
I

InvisibleEmpire

1.) Every 10 years science changes it's stance on many things. First they though this, then they thought that, and the majority of shit they "figure out" are "theories", at best. There is no way to know, 100%, where we come from and how we developed unless we lived the entire time and witnessed it first hand.

2.) If we "evolve", which means going from one species which changes into another species...why are there still apes? If we evolved from them, why are they still around?

3.) Let's see them explain emotion. Let them explain emotion with a fuckin' worm.
 

Miss Blunted

Resident Bongtender
Veteran
^wtf? calm yourself.

Interesting article h3ad, I enjoyed it. We may never know where we came from definitively...I don't believe in absolute truth, so to me...I never will. BUT, IT'S INTERESTING TO PONDER THE IDEAS OF WHERE WE CAME FROM!
 
G

Guest 26753

One thing we get from single cell creatures and worms like above is the endocannabinoid system, so that is cool in itself.
 

Phillthy

Seven-Thirty
ICMag Donor
Veteran
2.) If we "evolve", which means going from one species which changes into another species...why are there still apes? If we evolved from them, why are they still around?

a lot of evolution happens my mutation. if one or a few of a species mutate the species as a whole does not change. only the select few with the mutation and their offspring
 

Grat3fulh3ad

The Voice of Reason
Veteran
1.) Every 10 years science changes it's stance on many things. First they though this, then they thought that, and the majority of shit they "figure out" are "theories", at best. There is no way to know, 100%, where we come from and how we developed unless we lived the entire time and witnessed it first hand.

2.) If we "evolve", which means going from one species which changes into another species...why are there still apes? If we evolved from them, why are they still around?

3.) Let's see them explain emotion. Let them explain emotion with a fuckin' worm.

1. no they don't, they refine their theories as new information becomes available.

1.a. Is Evolution a Theory or a Fact?

It is both. But that answer requires looking more deeply at the meanings of the words "theory" and "fact."

In everyday usage, "theory" often refers to a hunch or a speculation. When people say, "I have a theory about why that happened," they are often drawing a conclusion based on fragmentary or inconclusive evidence.

The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence.

Many scientific theories are so well-established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics). Like these other foundational scientific theories, the theory of evolution is supported by so many observations and confirming experiments that scientists are confident that the basic components of the theory will not be overturned by new evidence. However, like all scientific theories, the theory of evolution is subject to continuing refinement as new areas of science emerge or as new technologies enable observations and experiments that were not possible previously.

2. There are plenty of examples of both macro and micro evolution, which could be given... pages and pages of lists of examples. Evolution does NOT teach that man evolved from apes. Man IS an ape. We, and apes have the same common ancestor (which was neither ape nor human).

3. Do a search for the "biology of emotion" and study the scholarly articles that come up. Just because you personally are unaware of data does not mean that said data does not exist.





All I will ever do on this subject is encourage everyone to NOT believe whatever you were taught, but to honestly and earnestly dig deeper into the available body of information, and base your position on knowledge not on hearsay.
 

Grat3fulh3ad

The Voice of Reason
Veteran
I beleive all species have and will evolve.Its just some of the things scientists guess at about how this did and will take place where I have my edumication problem.

scientists don't really guess, they use the scientific method to come to the most likely conclusions, given the current body of data.
If one is willing to dig into the subject, there is a wealth of information available that most people are unaware of.
 

Grat3fulh3ad

The Voice of Reason
Veteran
"most likely conclusions"

I call that a guess.

And you mischaracterize it by calling it one.

In everyday usage, "theory" often refers to a hunch or a speculation. When people say, "I have a theory about why that happened," they are often drawing a conclusion based on fragmentary or inconclusive evidence.

The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence.

If it is not supported by a vast body of evidence, and verifiable through experimentation, then it is not considered a theory by scientists.

"scientific theory" and the common usage of the word "theory" are two very different things.
"scientific theory's" definition is much closer to the common definition of "fact" than of "guess".


perhaps, like a lot of people, you are mistaking "theory" for "hypothesis"
 

Grat3fulh3ad

The Voice of Reason
Veteran
The heliocentric theory is the theory that the earth orbits the sun.
So you think that science is just guessing that the earth orbits the sun?
 

Miss Blunted

Resident Bongtender
Veteran
1. no they don't, they refine their theories as new information becomes available.

1.a. Is Evolution a Theory or a Fact?

It is both. But that answer requires looking more deeply at the meanings of the words "theory" and "fact."

In everyday usage, "theory" often refers to a hunch or a speculation. When people say, "I have a theory about why that happened," they are often drawing a conclusion based on fragmentary or inconclusive evidence.

The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence.

Many scientific theories are so well-established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics). Like these other foundational scientific theories, the theory of evolution is supported by so many observations and confirming experiments that scientists are confident that the basic components of the theory will not be overturned by new evidence. However, like all scientific theories, the theory of evolution is subject to continuing refinement as new areas of science emerge or as new technologies enable observations and experiments that were not possible previously.

2. There are plenty of examples of both macro and micro evolution, which could be given... pages and pages of lists of examples. Evolution does NOT teach that man evolved from apes. Man IS an ape. We, and apes have the same common ancestor (which was neither ape nor human).

3. Do a search for the "biology of emotion" and study the scholarly articles that come up. Just because you personally are unaware of data does not mean that said data does not exist.





All I will ever do on this subject is encourage everyone to NOT believe whatever you were taught, but to honestly and earnestly dig deeper into the available body of information, and base your position on knowledge not on hearsay.


Thanks for the contributions h3ad.....we really enjoy these types of articles in my house.
 

Bionic

Cautiously Optimistic
Veteran
A hypothesis is an educated guess but a guess, nonetheless. I'm a poet and didn't even know it! :tiphat:
 

Grat3fulh3ad

The Voice of Reason
Veteran
A hypothesis is an educated guess but a guess, nonetheless. I'm a poet and didn't even know it! :tiphat:

You are correct.
and a theory is a hypothesis that has been verified as valid by data and experiment.

being a scientific theory is the closest thing to 'being a fact' that exists in the realm of science.
 

HempHut

Active member

One of my favourite lines was in that episode.

The crew make their way into Fry's bowel, and fight their way to the pelvic splanchnic ganglion, intending to cause a massive bowel movement to expel the worm society:

Professor: "Listen, this is gonna be one hell of a bowel movement; afterwards, he'll be lucky to have any bones left."
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top