Until the next great discovery...
How significant
you mean the next piece of the increasingly complete jigsaw puzzle.
-
Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
-
Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!
When knowledge is suppressed we all lose.
- Thread starter Grat3fulh3ad
- Start date
- Status
you mean the next piece of the increasingly complete jigsaw puzzle.
I would like to express my appreciation to dagnabit for doing his best to exemplify the tactics outlined in the original post. His examples have done more to prove the point of the original post, than any other single thing in the entire thread.
kudos, dagnabit on a classic denialist role perfectly played.
kudos and thanks.
kudos, dagnabit on a classic denialist role perfectly played.
kudos and thanks.
well this is the point where head and i diverge. I, while believeing there is in fighting among the oligarchs, accept the new world order as a reality. and i accept that global warming is being used to maintain certain power structures as the status quo. however that doesn't prevent it from being true. however i have yet to see any creationist theories that even could be true. if i told you that this cardboard box contained a green monster from a race of beings who created the universe, and that it wanted you to give me your cash, but if you looked inside the box, the monster would turn invisible and you couldnt see it, would you believe me? what is the diff between that and tales of a sky god?
global warming scientists says here is what we have seen, go and look for yourself.
global warming scientists says here is what we have seen, go and look for yourself.
B
BrnCow
De Nile
De Nile
Is this thread heading back into that old boring "The earth is round" rumor again? We know it's flat!
De Nile
Is this thread heading back into that old boring "The earth is round" rumor again? We know it's flat!
I
In~Plain~Site
While I do believe global warming is taking place, those that would have you believe we have that much of an impact (or the cure for our own good...at my expense) can pound their drum all day for all I care.
Like I have said before, you want to believe you're that significant, turn off a light.
Thread/
Like I have said before, you want to believe you're that significant, turn off a light.
Thread/
Mezz Mezzrow
Member
All the world's scientists have data to support man-made global warming at their command? Really?! And you've examined all the relevant data yourself? Damn, I guess I'm out of my league here. But have you done a google search for antarctic ice? What comes up but antarctic ice growing? There seems to be research indicating such. How does that fit in to the "Science of Global Warming?"
I agree that some governing entities are using the facts surrounding global warming to advance their own agenda, but there is no single entity running the world.
Like I've always said... I think the market can do a better job than the government, and do not thing taxation is the most effective or ideal solution... in order to work toward solution, the market needs to know the reality of the situation... Denialism only makes government intervention more likely to be deemed necessary. A well informed public making smart market choices is the wisest course, imho.
Like I've always said... I think the market can do a better job than the government, and do not thing taxation is the most effective or ideal solution... in order to work toward solution, the market needs to know the reality of the situation... Denialism only makes government intervention more likely to be deemed necessary. A well informed public making smart market choices is the wisest course, imho.
you mean youre really asking why in parts of the globe where the temp is below 0, there is water freezing? oh well thats it then, proof, if water will freeze, the average temp accross the rest of the globe cant be affected at all can it? forget the fact that the temps in the antarctic are a lot lower than 0, so a rise of even a massive 5 degress wouldnt rise that temp above 0, if water will freeze anywhere, then the average temp cant be rising. how could i have been so silly to overlook that level of arguement.
sorry but come on, only a sarcastic response could have been expected to that
sorry but come on, only a sarcastic response could have been expected to that
your welcome!
and give yourself a pat too pot. the kettle cant take all the credit.
but this thread is about denialisim right? its not anything specific you are referring to is it?
so far your tactics concerning creationisim are those of a "denialist"
i did not think we were debating anything else.
but your gonna be the first in scientific history to prove a negative using the scientific method!
revolutionary!!!!
amazing!!!!!
a whole new world!!!
science can now disprove god once and for all!!!
can anyone say nobel?!?!?
I
In~Plain~Site
My gripe is with the flawed science that will cost me more, that is until they figure out we had no impact/control over global warming/cooling cycles millions of years old....woops.
Like I said, if you want to sleep more soundly, decrease your own foot-print, but stay out of my business.
Yes I've studied that already and yes it fits in perfectly well.
Please, take the time to have all of your questions answered, at my friend's website which has taken the time to collect and collate all of the available pertinent information. If you honestly seek the answers to your questions there, and still think AGW is a new world order fabrication, I'll be more than happy to continue this discussion.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
I will willingly consider any evidence you can provide which you think is unaccounted for as well.
My friends at skeptical science have some an excellent job presenting information, and even post up both sides of the email discussions they've had with some of the more prominent deniers.
Please.
I'd love to talk to someone skeptical who is willing to be rational and explore all the sides of the issue along with me...
your welcome!
and give yourself a pat too pot. the kettle cant take all the credit.
but this thread is about denialisim right? its not anything specific you are referring to is it?
so far your tactics concerning creationisim are those of a "denialist"
i did not think we were debating anything else.
but your gonna be the first in scientific history to prove a negative using the scientific method!
revolutionary!!!!
amazing!!!!!
a whole new world!!!
science can now disprove god once and for all!!!
can anyone say nobel?!?!?
Point out which of the denialist tactics I have used, or stop with the false accusations.
Nothing I said involves the proving of a negative. You are confused.
You want to start a thread on creationism vs science? I'll be more than happy to participate.
until then, your false accusations and ad hominem attacks exemplify denialists.
finally..
we all admit its just another "global warming" thread...
awesome the bullshit pretense is done...
have fun..
"denialisim"
LOL
Nope, I was answering a persons post, which was specifically about global warming.
AGW denialism is merely one species of the thing this thread is about.
you fail again!
damn you're good at looking desperate.
- Status
