What's new

5000 barrels a day of oil (210,000 gallons) leak off the coast of Louisiana

Status
Not open for further replies.

localman

Member
"extreamly TOXIC and it goes right thru the skin" SCARY as HELL!!!!!

Watch the LINK ABOVE!!!!!!

Those people who live around the gulf are Screwed!
 
FAST GOAT, i am searching for the whole truth. so far CNN and Anderson Cooper are all i can sortof count on. i have watched and totally believe the oil rain vids on youtube, as well as the nuclear option being the only thing that will work, as i believe the oil experts vid there as well, that the relief wells will FAIL due to the casing breaking. you have to wonder about a conspiracy thy as well with the use of inadequate casing material and bp's ordering haliburton to use less cement than what they themselves (haliburton) called out. the Death Wind will certainly take place. i feel we are being invaded and NOBODY IS DOING SHIT. if you look on page one i made a post back in May wherein i say i thought obama was doing a good job with what he had. well at the time.....NOT FUCKING NOW. it has been three months and he still has not brought out the 2000 oil skimmers that are right here in the u.s.. they have done nothing. they are still using the corexit. it is in fact, causing the oil to vaporize and rain oil all over. when the hurricanes hit, as they WILL, the whole east coast will be dead.


i would like to say one more thing. OBAMA is a fucking loser and i am ashamed that i voted for the mother fucker. i would vote for rush limbaugh before i vote for that worthless bag of shit one more time. although i am not from the south i am taking this oil spill like a knife in the heart. i have written endless times to all my senators and o'bummer and not one reply from any of them.

i am two months behind on my mortgage and was gonna let it go and try to stay here for 6 to 18 months until they throw me out, but now it appears that my property values are going to go up, along with the whole west coast.

FLYING GOAT, i need to know from you more about your alleged SECOND leak (3rd too), for this is something i have only heard from you. If the relief wells do in fact fail, then they will need to put the atom bomb somewhere that will seal ALL of the leaks, not just the one on tv. you can pm me anytime.

i live where it is you suggested you may want to move. i anticipate many in your area will want to move here too. however there are now fishing limits on what can be taken. in alaska, those guys on Deadliest Catch and like them are about the only ones allowed to fish. for they give out quotas to all of them based on what they have been catching in the past. i dont know for sure but i am pretty damned sure that you just cant go up there an start fishing anymore. you have to have been up there doing it to get a quota. so the others who bring their boats up here will be s.o.l.

i live on one lot in the city. i have friends tho where you can keep your goats. depending on how many in your family you could stay here for maybe 3 months 4 free (four br house, i only use two). their are boat builders in Anacortes (Dakota Creek Industries) that i know are non-union and the pay reflects that. there are lots of houses for rent around here for 800-$1000 a month. i think my old roomie that worked at DC made like $15 /hr. which is chump change but could pay the rent. the economy right here is suck! which is why i am two months behind my mortgage. up in Bellingham and Everett things are better and there is much more dock work in Seattle. most of the docks are full of Navy ships in everett. i dont know of any ship building in bellingham and there is nothing north of there. it is hard to emigrate to canada. if i could i WOULD!!

thanks for verifying for me that it is in fact raining oil. please let me know about the other oil leaks. i know the well leaks because of the failure of the top kill. i really dont want to reveal much more about my whereabouts, lets just say anacortes is very near.
 
J

JackTheGrower

does anyone know if that new cap worked or not? Can't find anything on it.

National Public Radio NPR just said they will try and close the valves to see if it will leak.
If it doesn't they may keep the valves closed. NPR reports it went really well.
If it leaks they still have the ability to syphon.
 

SmilinBob

Member
They have the capped secure, and it worked great. BP said it will take anywhere from 6 to 12 to 48 hours to test the different pressures with each closed valve.
 

bodymind

Member
Veteran
that's great news about the new cap working so far. this whole situation is really sad. but, i know of no other sustainable way of being other than optimistic. i've been surfing in our gulf since the spill and i am alive and doing well. i saw a sea turtle last week pop up next to me that looked like its skin had been bleached - chemical burned. but i was out there with it, experiencing its world. it's most important to be present. there is NO better way of knowing other than direct experience.

i've grown up surfing and offshore fishing on and in gulf of mexico, and i know that we will survive. i think we will be seeing the effects of this spill and it'd dispersants for years and decades after they stop the gushing oil, but if this is what it takes for us human to learn about our blindness and greed then so be it. we will keep making mistakes until we do learn.

i'm pissed at bp, but this is less of an "us-against-them" scenario than everyone wants to think. how many of you live petroleum-free lives? anyone? how many of you plan on stopping your use of oil because of this spill? anyone? ... you get my point?

the conspiracy theories are too easy and seductive to accept, and they are a great way to remove yourself from the equation - makes it too easy to point fingers. the damage has been done and will continue being done. we can only love ourselves and improve our own lives, trust the people around us, and know that the kind of love that our mother gives us can be a very tough love sometimes.
 

hoosierdaddy

Active member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
i'm pissed at bp, but this is less of an "us-against-them" scenario than everyone wants to think. how many of you live petroleum-free lives? anyone? how many of you plan on stopping your use of oil because of this spill? anyone? ... you get my point?
Very frustrating as well as sad but, many here do not get your point at all.

Great post, BTW.
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran

bodymind

Member
Veteran
disco, you are very right about bp being a particularly idiotic petroleum business. also, your links on your post at the top of the page are really good.
 

SmilinBob

Member
how many of you live petroleum-free lives? anyone? how many of you plan on stopping your use of oil because of this spill? anyone? ... you get my point?
I'm sure if people had the resources to cut there dependence on oil they would do it. People don't do it because they can't afford it. If they was offered another option that is affordable I'm sure many wouldn't hesitate to get away from oil.

the conspiracy theories are too easy and seductive to accept, and they are a great way to remove yourself from the equation -
They may be easy to accept, but they shouldn't be so easily dismissed. Especially in an industry as lucrative as the oil industry. Anywhere there is massive money you can bet you ass there are conspirators, cover ups, and everything else that comes with billions of dollars.

What's your opinion on BP lobbying with Libya to get the transfer of the lockerbie bomber from the UK back to Libya where he was set free. As soon as the man goes free, BP gets the ok from Libya to drill off their coast..

May not be any conspiracies.. But there is definitly some shady, greedy stuff that comes with these businesses.
 

hoosierdaddy

Active member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
These character flaws exist in every company and industry. They also exist in each and every society and every family. It is the human condition.
The one who is more pure than BP, or Obama, or George Bush...do step up so we can get a good look at you. Maybe even critique you a bit...
 

SmilinBob

Member
Your right, everyone has character flaws, but billions of dollars will guarantee people to do things they normally wouldn't. Give a man a huge sum of money to do something that isn't in the best interest of millions of people.. If it's enough money he won't think twice.

Normal people carrying on with their everyday lives exhibits semi harmless character flaws. Not the case when big money is involved.
 

mriko

Green Mujaheed
Veteran
I'm sure if people had the resources to cut there dependence on oil they would do it. People don't do it because they can't afford it. If they was offered another option that is affordable I'm sure many wouldn't hesitate to get away from oil.

It's just everywhere, our whole civilisation is based on oil. I have no car or any thermic-engine vehicle, so i use no oil, but my computer is partly made of plastics, made from oil and damn plastic is just everywhere.
Oil is also in some many clothes, with polyamide or polyesther for instance.

The darn thing is just everywhere !

the conspiracy theories are too easy and seductive to accept, and they are a great way to remove yourself from the equation -

groan.. I alwayd get upset when I hear this "conspiracy theory" thing when another, usually disturbing, light is shone on news (i'm talking rather about in mainstream media, not pointing personnaly at you bodymind)
This is the easy way to level down the so-called "theories" to something worth publishing only in News of the World and therefore not worth discussing. For sure there are true fantasies going on as well (this haarp thing reaches amazing levels of dumbnes for instance) and one has to do some news trimming to sort out the facts. But dismissing it all as conspiracy theories is just too easy.

It is a fact that everyday's fate of the world is planned and decided by corporate governments and that these people will do anything they can if it means, more money & power. And if killing a few millions of people brings in enough profit, that's not a problem. there's nothing of any conspiracy in claiming that, it's just the truth.

About oil companies, they are simply evilish, motivated exclusively my profit and just don't give a shit about us "small people", to quote one of them BP executives.
Killing local populations, wiping out whole ecosystems is not a problem for them, because it pays ! There's the Gulf of course, but less talked about is Nigeria, in the Niger river delta where huge amounts of crude oil have been released. When i say huge, it means more than for the gulf leak. THe way life of locals has simply been destroyed and they're dying from cancer and other poisoning due to the oil which is everywhre in water and soil. Last resort locals had was to go into armed struggle, which got them names such as "terrorists", "pirates" and so on. Oil corps came in, destroyed everything and if someone tries to resist & protext his land & community, he's terrorist so can be killed, eradicated with the blessings of so-called "international community".

SOme interesting article here, about them bloody work in Sudan (another corp than BP)

Oil companies complicit in Sudan civil war, report alleges

By Brian Smith
WSWS
Monday, Jul 12, 2010

12 July 2010

The European Coalition on Oil in Sudan (ECOS)—a group of 50 European Non Governmental Organisations—recently released a report, “Unpaid debt: The legacy of Lundin, Petronas and OMV in Sudan, 1997-2003”. It alleges that an oil consortium led by Swedish firm Lundin Petroleum (and including Petronas of Malaysia, OMV of Austria and the Sudanese state oil company Sudapet) may have been complicit in “war crimes and crimes against humanity” in Sudan.

ECOS notes that the Lundin Consortium signed a 1997 agreement with the Khartoum government for the exploitation of oil in the Block 5A concession on the border of North and South Sudan, an area not controlled by the government. ECOS claims that the start of exploration in Block 5A set off “a spiral of violence as the Sudanese government and forces loyal to them set out to secure and take control of the oilfields in that block”.

The report says that in the ensuing six years the civilian population was forcibly displaced following indiscriminate attacks, pillage, killing, rape, abduction, torture and the burning of shelters. It alleges that the Sudanese government’s efforts to secure the oilfields included the use of “artillery, ground troops, helicopter gunships, and high-altitude bombers against the civilian population”. ECOS estimates that 12,000 people died and “almost 200,000 people were violently displaced” in the process.

Jeffrey Fountain, vice president for legal affairs of Lundin Petroleum, has pointed to an open letter on the company’s website refuting “all the allegations and inferences of wrongdoing attributed to Lundin Petroleum”.

The Swedish public prosecutor has opened a criminal investigation into Lundin Petroleum’s activities in Sudan between 1997 and 2003 following the ECOS report, and has launched a formal investigation into the role played by Swedish Minister for Foreign Affairs Carl Bildt, who was on Lundin’s board during the period.

Said Mahmoudi, professor of international law at Stockholm University, believes that “you have evidence that Lundin knew about what was happening, and they just closed their eyes simply because it was a question of millions and millions of dollars”.

The report splits the events into three stages. 1997–1999: Commencement of oil exploration by the Lundin Consortium sparks war in Block 5A; 2000–2001: Oil is discovered amidst intense violence; and 2002–2003: A Military Solution.

In the first stage, Lundin Petroleum and the Sudanese Government signed the Block 5A Exploration and Production-sharing Agreement in February 1997, just 10 weeks before the signing of the Khartoum Peace Agreement between the government and the Southern independence and defence groups.

After bringing OMV, Petronas and Sudapet on board, Lundin began seismic acquisition, and Khartoum sent in troops and the air force to keep the South Sudan Defence Force (SSDF) from controlling the oilfields. The peace deal soon collapsed.

In May 1999, the Lundin Consortium suspended its operations after an attack on its oil installations by the SSDF, though it soon after announced “a significant new oil discovery” comparable with the finds in Blocks 1 and 2 that contained an estimated 500 to 800 million barrels of reserves.

In the second stage, while operations were officially suspended, Lundin pushed on with building an all-weather road to the oilfield with the help of a major government offensive to protect road construction.

The completion of a pipeline from Blocks 1 and 2 to the Red Sea in July 1999 led to huge oil revenues flowing into Khartoum’s coffers, which allowed the government to increase its offensives in Block 5A using newly purchased large-calibre artillery, helicopter gunships, and armoured combat vehicles.

The road was completed in January 2001, when Lundin began drilling, and by March it announced a major oil strike with the field reportedly containing recoverable reserves of 149.1 million barrels of oil.

In the third stage the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) and the Sudan People’s Defence Force (SPDF), who had reunified following a cease-fire agreement in August 2001, declared oil operations a legitimate military target. Khartoum responded by launching a final major offensive to control Block 5A and to clear the oil areas of civilians.

In January 2002, Lundin was again forced to suspend operations after an attack on its installations. In March 2003, after announcing that it would resume activities, Lundin Petroleum and OMV sold their rights in Block 5A to Petronas and ONGC Videsh Ltd (India) respectively.

In September 2003, the Naivasha Agreement on Security Arrangements was signed by the Khartoum government and the SPLA (representing the Southern ruling elites), as a prelude to the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) between the parties signed on January 9, 2005, bringing to an end two decades of civil war in which some 2 million people died—mostly due to starvation—and 4 million people lost their homes.

The CPA called for a future (2011) referendum on Southern independence and the sharing of oil and non-oil revenue. It made the SPLA the de facto ruling group in the South and a partner to rule in Khartoum. Under the wealth-sharing agreement all revenue was to be shared between Khartoum and the SPLA, with each receiving at least 2 percent of oil revenue.

The main impetus for settling the dispute has been pressure from Europe and the United States, because the 20-year civil war hampered their ability to extract the enormous oil reserves that lie predominantly under the border region. Southern Sudan produces over 80 percent of all the country’s oil, which contributes around 70 percent of total Sudanese exports. US oil companies felt that they have been hampered by Washington’s uncompromising stance on Sudan, and felt marginalised by other foreign oil companies that were working more closely with the Khartoum regime.

In the five years since its signing, the oil revenue generated did not find its way to the wider population, where poverty and sporadic starvation are the norm. Nor was money spent on much needed infrastructure projects.

In addition, the shaky alliances that went into signing the CPA have disintegrated, with Northern and Southern partners within the Government of National Unity at loggerheads, and divisions re-emerging within the Southern parties as the referendum approaches. The SPLA government was accused of corruption, and along with the Khartoum government, of fraud during the recent elections. from http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_60596.shtml

About the US, you can search about Mountain top removal in the Appalachias, or also about gas fracking, which happens in most of the US and brings destruction & misery upon many "small people" (check these links for more about fracking : http://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=181205


When it comes to exploiting a energy &/or mineral resource, them corps know no limit.

Take care everyone !

Irie !
 

bodymind

Member
Veteran
good post mriko and smilin bob. i'm not dismissing the truths about corporate and government greed and cover-ups, or even some of the less mainstream ideas about strings being pulled by people and institutions who remain largely hidden. we should all be informed and about what influences our world, our lives, and the lives of our fellow humans.

however, i think a lot of people do get caught up in hysterics over these disasters and get very caught up in speculative and alarmist finger pointing. recently, i had a friend post photos of a "mud lump" formation on the beach in louisiana, and there were no less than 50 comments on this photo within a day speculating on what rig it came from, how it floated ashore, whether it was oil that had been dispersed, etc. all alarmist stuff. people are scared of the world now. i knew what the stuff was upon first glancing at the photo: an ancient silt bed that forms the base layers of much of the gulf coast from alabama to texas. if these people had been intimate with their environment before this disaster, i believe we would be seeing more sober responses from many of them. the level of many people's fear is in direct proportion to their feeling of disconnection to the world in which they live.

this oil spill is a wake up call and people from all over the world are opening their eyes, and like waking up from a deep sleep, they are disoriented. lets guide them and ourselves to a better waking life. :)
 
if you want to guide them anywhere you can guide them away from the gulf..

i think this way. bp is totally negligent and needs to pay for every dime of cleaning this up. something they can never, ever do, even at 1 billion USD profit a month. they are going to go bye-bye brothers. and hopefully, i am thinking, the u.s. govt will be able to get ahold of their major assets, like their refineries, one i know of each in texas and cherry point, washington, and probably many more in the u.s.: ie nationalize them.

on the other hand. OBAMA, personally, individually, my his mother fucking SELF is responsible for the oil not getting cleaned up. NEVER MIND THE FUCKING way bp and everybody else got their permits, DOUCHE BAG OBUMMA' had the option of overriding the Jones act, bringing in skimmers from over seas, and also could have sent every one of the u.s.'s TWO THOUSAND MUTHER FUCKIN SKIMMERS to the GOD DAMNED GULF and DIDN'T!

NOT ONLY THAT; he COULD HAVE, THREE MOTHER FUCKIN MONTHS AGO, told bp to STOP using COREXIT, UN-FUCKING TESTED, to disperse the oil, only to find out that it is causing the oil to VAPORIZE AND RAIN ON THE GROUND, it is going to kill everything, AND O-MUTHER-FUCKIN-BAMA-LAMA-DING-DONG IS STILL DOING FUCKING NOTHING!!!!!

sOrry, did i miss the point somewhere? maybe i'm off on some kind of tangent.
 

Tronic

Member
if you want to guide them anywhere you can guide them away from the gulf..

i think this way. bp is totally negligent and needs to pay for every dime of cleaning this up. something they can never, ever do, even at 1 billion USD profit a month. they are going to go bye-bye brothers. and hopefully, i am thinking, the u.s. govt will be able to get ahold of their major assets, like their refineries, one i know of each in texas and cherry point, washington, and probably many more in the u.s.: ie nationalize them.

on the other hand. OBAMA, personally, individually, my his mother fucking SELF is responsible for the oil not getting cleaned up. NEVER MIND THE FUCKING way bp and everybody else got their permits, DOUCHE BAG OBUMMA' had the option of overriding the Jones act, bringing in skimmers from over seas, and also could have sent every one of the u.s.'s TWO THOUSAND MUTHER FUCKIN SKIMMERS to the GOD DAMNED GULF and DIDN'T!

NOT ONLY THAT; he COULD HAVE, THREE MOTHER FUCKIN MONTHS AGO, told bp to STOP using COREXIT, UN-FUCKING TESTED, to disperse the oil, only to find out that it is causing the oil to VAPORIZE AND RAIN ON THE GROUND, it is going to kill everything, AND O-MUTHER-FUCKIN-BAMA-LAMA-DING-DONG IS STILL DOING FUCKING NOTHING!!!!!

sOrry, did i miss the point somewhere? maybe i'm off on some kind of tangent.

the only 'points' you missed were that:

a) bp is not now, nor in our lifetime, going bye-bye, and the US Govt will not seize any of their assets.

b) put any president in his position, same exact thing happens. dont hate the player (president) hate the game (congress/corps/big$$/OIL). just the way it is in todays society man, i dont agree with it but its a fact.

cheers :tiphat:
 
Last edited:

dagnabit

Game Bred
Veteran
.

b) put any president in his position, same exact thing happens. dont hate the player (president) hate the game (congress/corps/big$$/OIL). just the way it is in todays society man, i dont agree with it but its a fact.

cheers :tiphat:
even fucking dubbya had the brains to repeal the jones act after katrina.
and he is quite possibly the dumbest fuck on the planet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top