What's new

HOLY SHIT!!!!! World Record Moose (pic)

T

twisted treez

SO you all say you hunt, but would not kill that one, Why not? if your hunting your killing! I am an avid hunter, i don't see anything wron\g with killing that animal. if no one killed any animals, do you no that they would overpopulate and die. its a fact of life. when there are to many animals in an area, they get disease's and starve to death. the worst site in the world is an animal starving to death. I'm sorry if you people do not agree with me but i have just stated facts. IMO


so if people overpopulate then its ok to kill them , so you should rent the movie hostel
 
P

pSi007

twisted treez said:
how can it be against the law to kill a dog



Its not... Animal control does it all the time, everyday.

Anybody can take any dog in their possession to the SPCA/dog pound, pay about $50 and have it put to sleep. BUT if you take it out back along with a shotgun and try to save yourself $50, thats a felony.


Its odd that it is only legal to kill a dog if you pay the dog police money. :spank:
 

Guest423

Active member
Veteran
nice kill...that rules...no hunters passed on that thing...i don't know many hunters that say wow that one there is way to big to shoot....but i don't like gun hunting...bow hunting is where it's at.
 

NOKUY

Active member
Veteran
i never seen the movie hostel...i have the shortest attention span on earth when it comes to movies.....if it is good then plz tell me why u recommend it.

...other than that im an avid hunter too and why the fuk would you kil that moose.


moose is better meat than anything u will ever get in the grocery, but that boy wasnt taken for meat, he was str8 taken out of the gene pool, and that asshole deserved the bullet more than that moose did...and i would tell it to him to his face all day.

i really hope he feels like a big man...and i guarantee he drives a jaked up truk to compensate for his little fukin pussy!
 

NOKUY

Active member
Veteran
Time2Unite said:
nice kill...that rules...no hunters passed on that thing...i don't know many hunters that say wow that one there is way to big to shoot....but i don't like gun hunting...bow hunting is where it's at.

bro even in alaska i think a thousand hunters passed on that boy.

there are a zillion other options for meat, and that moose wasnt the one that needed to be killed...that fukin guy is an asshole all day everyday in my book.

if i had land i would haved protected that animal, and no way in the world would he have been able to be hunted.

there are animals that he could have taken, but he was a trophy hunter...and in the words of eminem he can "suck my dick while im pukin"! (u peeps dont know that song) haha
 

facelift

This is the money you could be saving if you grow
Veteran
I had one of those sneak up behind in while hiking in the Tetons. It scared the crap out of me. It came in real close of a good sniff too.
 

NOKUY

Active member
Veteran
the tetons are a fukin nice place,,,im a wyoming boy (wyoming and alaska)...fukin cool place are the tetons...and peeps better leave that shit alone too!
 
NOKUY said:
haha...well thats not really fair...(maybe strap sum antlers to your head to even it out a bit)

i have a happy medium.... go with a bow and arrow! on the ground! and it can't be compound!

either you're a helluva sharpshooter or you can run like a mofo...

well, i dunno if moose charge when shot at, but i do know a simple bow and arrow probly would just bounce off that beautiful animal.

I had NEVER seen a photo of a moose with soemthing to compare in size to.... wow, they are huge!
 

NOKUY

Active member
Veteran
twisted treez said:
SO you all say you hunt, but would not kill that one, Why not? if your hunting your killing! I am an avid hunter, i don't see anything wron\g with killing that animal. if no one killed any animals, do you no that they would overpopulate and die. its a fact of life. when there are to many animals in an area, they get disease's and starve to death. the worst site in the world is an animal starving to death. I'm sorry if you people do not agree with me but i have just stated facts. IMO


so if people overpopulate then its ok to kill them , so you should rent the movie hostel

bro that animal is the KING of the gene pool, and unless u are starving and trying to feed a huge village then no fukin way is that boy 'fair game"

if u are feeding a family in alaska a sheep or 'bou will do....no problem...or a yung moose....

that moose should not have been hunted under any circumstance in my book.

like i sid and ill say again that dude is an asshole, and i would not hesitate to spit in his face for taking that beautiful animal off the planet
 

Guest423

Active member
Veteran
that moose has already passed on his genes for years....you can bet he has offspring out there right now almost his size with the same exact gene pool.

after a moose like that is past his prime...which he would be shortly he wouldn't even have breeding rights anymore...he'd be on his down cycle...his rack would get smaller...and he couldn't win fights for the right to breed...he'd either die in a fight or of old age...either one was just around the corner.
 

ConceptOfSleep

Active member
Wow....Its amazing to know that amazing graceful animals like that can still be found. The size of that animal alone is absolutely breathtaking...

Its unfortunate some shmuck with a gun saw it and his first reaction was "Im gon kill that sumbitch!"....

Sad really..

:joint:
 

NOKUY

Active member
Veteran
i dont care how u jusify it, and i wont argue here ever again.....that moose should not have been killed!
 

Guest423

Active member
Veteran
twisted treez said:
SO you all say you hunt, but would not kill that one, Why not? if your hunting your killing!

your facts are right...even the parts i didn't quote

killing is killing period...how can any hunter say that they would let that big one go but kill a baby or smaller animal for food? that makes you a better or more ethical hunter cause you decided to kill a smaller animal that hasn't even experienced life yet? doesn't have it's full skills yet...hasn't had pussy yet.

anytime i'm out doing any kind of hunting or fishing i'm looking for the biggest one.

the only part that pisses me off about hunters is when guys pay 10 g's for a guided trip with a rifle that can shoot all the way across the valley and to the other mountian...get a trophy and think they are cool or really good hunters.

me...i'd take more pride in knowing i did my scouting and set up my own stand, played the wind perfect, got all scent free, and coaxed that beast into 10-20 yards with my bow...knowing the animal had the chance to use all his skills and instincts....thats way more fair then poppin my head over a boulder and shooting the big moose across 4 valleys on the other mountain with my long range rifle when he's minding his own business and not even alert...thats barely any different then going target practicing.

if people passed on smaller animals more there would be alot more of mature animals just like the ones in the pics...them ones are more rare cause everyone shoots the smaller ones cause they are the animals with less skill....anyone can get those...lets see who can go play fair and go get the beast of the woods...that guy would probably shit his pants and cry to his mom if that beast stepped out 10 yards from him out of the brush and all he had was his bow.
 

NOKUY

Active member
Veteran
said w/ perfection!..by genkisan

What a bunch of unscientific self-justifying bullshit.

Look at any culture where they have a sustainable philosophy of dealing with nature, and you will see that the biggest and healthiest animals are always left alone, so they can continue to :

a) contribute their proven genetic qualities to future generations
b) challenge the smaller, younger males and keep them in better form


There is a reason why catch and release fishing has become the norm for competititive fishermen...because if they all kept the huge trophy-sized breeders, they would have no more fish to enjoy catching quite soon.


Stocks of animals from king crab to sturgeon and many more have gone drastically down in average size of individuals caught, and very much in part because people do not have the smarts to put back and leave alive the biggest, wisest and most successful breeders. Young, unproven animals are infinitely more dispensable to the herd from a genetic point of view than huge old successful breeders like the big buck at the beginning of the thread.

Think of how many fawns will miss out on having the genetic advantages that giant buck could pass on, just because some micro-kawked fucknut with an ego problem had to shoot the biggest moose.

And yes I am a vegetarian, btw.
 

Guest423

Active member
Veteran
catch and release is key...if i get any fish mounts from the big ones i catch they are replicas...i measure the length, the girth, weigh it and take a couple pics quick and they go back in the water.

most the small bucks you shoot have the same male genes as the monster shown in the pic since he was the breeder of the area...but you'll never get to see it because it gets shot at a young age.

to think since that big one is gone the gene pool is damaged is pretty funny...since he's passed on his genes ever since he was the breeder.

if people passed on the small bucks and let them mature you wouldn't have to worry about anyone shooting the breeder because they all would be mature with excellent genes....instead of 1 bruiser beating up on all bucks and only passing his genes for a givin area there would be so many big bucks just like him that the true breeder would be the one you want cause his competition would be so much greater to be the true breeder with so much fierce competiton...big bucks like that would be common instead of rare.

the best way to manage a herd is get it as close as you can to 50/50 male/female ratio....take females for food because they are the most common and make the ratio lopsided....pass on all immature bucks and let them mature...you can bet the buck with the best genes will still be doing the breeding...except you'd have more and bigger bucks doin all the breeding...because when they fight for breeding the loser gets kicked out of the area and he just goes to the next area until he is the one...it would make it better for the whole herd if there was more and bigger bucks all around.

i'd rather see 1 big mature animal with primo genes get killed then 50 smaller ones with the same primo genes....all them little ones getting killed before their prime would be the same as the mature one in the pic.
 

clorox

Smokin on that serious...
As a hunter, i definatley oppose the unnecassary killing of an animal, espcially for trophy, that man deserves to be eviscerated
 
clorox said:
As a hunter, i definatley oppose the unnecassary killing of an animal, espcially for trophy, that man deserves to be eviscerated

Unfortunately it seems like those of us who hunt with discretion are not considered hunters to some.
 

Vol Funk

Member
That moose probably fucked thousands of cows in his lifetime. The genes probably been passed on for hundreds time.

That moose is like what...12-16 years old? He only got 1-2 years left(moose rarely live more than 16 years).

I don't hunt, but that's the way of life....Charles Darwin :wink:
 
Last edited:
So what did he kill it with? .375 H&H? Anything less would be a joke. Going up against that beast.

Just i^^agine quartering and packing it out. Fuck that. 3 years of nothing but ^^oose ^^eat. Fuck that too. I just hope he didnt cut off the antlers and bury the rest.
 
Top