Did you get the Covid Vaccine
- Thread starter Putembk
- Start date
- Status
Dime
Well-known member
Thanks for making my point
Does anyone who got vaccinated regret it?
Is there a reason for this thread?
Is there a reason for this thread?
dogzter
Drapetomaniac
Adverse events following COVID‐19 mRNA vaccines: A systematic review of cardiovascular complication, thrombosis, and thrombocytopenia
Since publishing successful clinical trial results of mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines in December 2020, multiple reports have arisen about cardiovascular complications following the mRNA vaccination. This study provides ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
RickLafleur
Well-known member
Not me, vaxed and boosted and will be getting the next booster when due. I’ve had Covid twice and both times it was like a bad cold. I’m positive the vaccine helped me.
To me at all comes down to a simple and easy decision. Who are you going to believe; scientists who’ve dedicated their lives to the study of infectious diseases or google warriors who slid down the rabbit hole doing their own research?
To me at all comes down to a simple and easy decision. Who are you going to believe; scientists who’ve dedicated their lives to the study of infectious diseases or google warriors who slid down the rabbit hole doing their own research?
420PyRoS
Well-known member
RickLafleur
Well-known member
Adverse events following COVID‐19 mRNA vaccines: A systematic review of cardiovascular complication, thrombosis, and thrombocytopenia
Since publishing successful clinical trial results of mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines in December 2020, multiple reports have arisen about cardiovascular complications following the mRNA vaccination. This study provides ...
shiva82
Well-known member
So Hai
Well-known member
Trust the science, those guys are honestly good good straight through racial breed of truth tellers. Fucking bloggers though, doing their own research they need to be BANNED!
The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, an affiliate of Harvard Medical School, is seeking to retract six scientific studies and correct 31 others that were published by the institute's top researchers, including its CEO. The researchers are accused of manipulating data images with simple methods, primarily with copy-and-paste in image editing software, such as Adobe Photoshop. The accusations come from data sleuth Sholto David and colleagues on PubPeer, an online forum for researchers to discuss publications that has frequently served to spot dubious research and potential fraud. On January 2, David posted on his research integrity blog, For Better Science, a long list of potential data manipulation from DFCI researchers. The post highlighted many data figures that appear to contain pixel-for-pixel duplications. The allegedly manipulated images are of data such as Western blots, which are used to detect and visualize the presence of proteins in a complex mixture.
DFCI Research Integrity Officer Barrett Rollins told The Harvard Crimson that David had contacted DFCI with allegations of data manipulation in 57 DFCI-led studies. Rollins said that the institute is "committed to a culture of accountability and integrity," and that "every inquiry about research integrity is examined fully." The allegations are against: DFCI President and CEO Laurie Glimcher, Executive Vice President and COO William Hahn, Senior Vice President for Experimental Medicine Irene Ghobrial, and Harvard Medical School professor Kenneth Anderson. The Wall Street Journal noted that Rollins, the integrity officer, is also a co-author on two of the studies. He told the outlet he is recused from decisions involving those studies.
The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, an affiliate of Harvard Medical School, is seeking to retract six scientific studies and correct 31 others that were published by the institute's top researchers, including its CEO. The researchers are accused of manipulating data images with simple methods, primarily with copy-and-paste in image editing software, such as Adobe Photoshop. The accusations come from data sleuth Sholto David and colleagues on PubPeer, an online forum for researchers to discuss publications that has frequently served to spot dubious research and potential fraud. On January 2, David posted on his research integrity blog, For Better Science, a long list of potential data manipulation from DFCI researchers. The post highlighted many data figures that appear to contain pixel-for-pixel duplications. The allegedly manipulated images are of data such as Western blots, which are used to detect and visualize the presence of proteins in a complex mixture.
DFCI Research Integrity Officer Barrett Rollins told The Harvard Crimson that David had contacted DFCI with allegations of data manipulation in 57 DFCI-led studies. Rollins said that the institute is "committed to a culture of accountability and integrity," and that "every inquiry about research integrity is examined fully." The allegations are against: DFCI President and CEO Laurie Glimcher, Executive Vice President and COO William Hahn, Senior Vice President for Experimental Medicine Irene Ghobrial, and Harvard Medical School professor Kenneth Anderson. The Wall Street Journal noted that Rollins, the integrity officer, is also a co-author on two of the studies. He told the outlet he is recused from decisions involving those studies.
RickLafleur
Well-known member
lol. I don’t think you thought this reply through unless you have medical qualifications.
From what I’ve read so far I don’t think so.
shiva82
Well-known member
i get it. you took the shots, or maybe not. you are a statesman. the enemy of the people. a total weapon. keep on trucking
RickLafleur
Well-known member
shiva82
Well-known member
there is a theme with you bacon enablers. so predictable
420PyRoS
Well-known member
What kind of rebuttal is this?
That was directly from DOJ. Thought you trusted these guys blindly too?
Are you dumb or stupid?
Just so I know how to talk to you.
shiva82
Well-known member
literal no qualifications, brainwashed into following a narrative and actually insulting chaps in the thread with degrees and phds . i'm sure deep down you are ok , like everyone. but you are crazy , dangerous to society and deluded
RickLafleur
Well-known member
Did you read the article you posted? If you did, did you understand everything in it? Did you read the conclusion?
Maybe you should read it again.
You won’t have to worry about how to talk to me, asshole because you just went on ignore.
I’m finished with this thread. Good luck to all, vaxxers and anti-vaxxers alike.
420PyRoS
Well-known member
- Status
