Have You Been Vaccinated?
- Thread starter Tudo
- Start date
Did you say yummy bud
I almost did. I still believe.
Doctor M
Active member
6000% Increase in Reported Vaccine Deaths 1st Quarter 2021 Compared to 1st Quarter 2020
https://www.globalresearch.ca/6000-i...r-2020/5741588
European Plans for ‘Vaccine Passports’ Were in Place 20 Months Prior to the Pandemic. Coincidence?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/europe...ndemic/5741702
“It is time for everyone to come out of this negative trance, this collective hysteria, because famine, poverty, mass unemployment will kill and destroy the lives of many more people than SARS-CoV-2! ” (Dr. Pascal Sacré)
“I’m seeing patients that have facial rashes, fungal infections, bacterial infections. … In February and March we were told not to wear masks. What changed? The science didn’t change. The politics did. This is about compliance. It’s not about science… (Dr. James Meehan)
https://www.globalresearch.ca/6000-i...r-2020/5741588
European Plans for ‘Vaccine Passports’ Were in Place 20 Months Prior to the Pandemic. Coincidence?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/europe...ndemic/5741702
“It is time for everyone to come out of this negative trance, this collective hysteria, because famine, poverty, mass unemployment will kill and destroy the lives of many more people than SARS-CoV-2! ” (Dr. Pascal Sacré)
“I’m seeing patients that have facial rashes, fungal infections, bacterial infections. … In February and March we were told not to wear masks. What changed? The science didn’t change. The politics did. This is about compliance. It’s not about science… (Dr. James Meehan)
Doctor M
Active member
Was this a problem during that period?
Death By Prescription
By one estimate, taking prescribed medications is the fourth leading cause of death among Americans.
https://health.usnews.com/health-ne...7/the-danger-in-taking-prescribed-medications
yeah misinformation is a very old problem, most of the time it's the mainstream that ends up having lied. remember the golf of tonkin? iraqi wmd? Syrian chemical weapons? Russian bounties etc etc, misinformation is a tool of government not so much the opposition, as they don't have to lie to expose lies. so yeah, when i see a concerted effort to tell me a 4 month old vaccine is the only sensible option in this situation, i see a concerted effort to demonise anyone mentioning a few inconvenient facts about this vaccine, (are they countering with a flood of transparency and data?) no, they answer with ridicule and a pretence that this vaccine is the same as a tetanus vaccine in terms of safety, when there is just no way in hell they can know that as a fact, at this very early stage in the human trails.
i have no issue with anyone making the decision to take it, but when you stand there ridiculing peoples hesitation on what seem to be very logical grounds i have to wonder wtf is going on. how come you are so trusting? have you forgotten how often you are lied to about catastrophic events? they lie about lead in the water, they lie about nuclear accidents, they lie about pollution from gas pipe leaks.
they lie about everything, from the biggest to the smallest shit. they lied about weed for 70 years fs. big pharma lies about meds all the time, they lobby, bribe and pay for positive papers supporting their for profit poison and drug peddling. but some how now they have turned a new leaf, some how this vaccine will be the exception, its all above board, not about a big money grab at all.
Nurses Not Injecting the Actual Venom. What`s Going On".
[video]https://brandnewtube.com/watch/nurses-not-injecting-the-actual-venom-what-s-going-on-quot_lquTgAQQCbEBky2.html[/video]
the above might well be a fake or troll, seems too fucking crazy to be true, lmao.....
i have no issue with anyone making the decision to take it, but when you stand there ridiculing peoples hesitation on what seem to be very logical grounds i have to wonder wtf is going on. how come you are so trusting? have you forgotten how often you are lied to about catastrophic events? they lie about lead in the water, they lie about nuclear accidents, they lie about pollution from gas pipe leaks.
they lie about everything, from the biggest to the smallest shit. they lied about weed for 70 years fs. big pharma lies about meds all the time, they lobby, bribe and pay for positive papers supporting their for profit poison and drug peddling. but some how now they have turned a new leaf, some how this vaccine will be the exception, its all above board, not about a big money grab at all.
Nurses Not Injecting the Actual Venom. What`s Going On".
[video]https://brandnewtube.com/watch/nurses-not-injecting-the-actual-venom-what-s-going-on-quot_lquTgAQQCbEBky2.html[/video]
the above might well be a fake or troll, seems too fucking crazy to be true, lmao.....
Gaius, you really do have well thought out points, no arguments with many of them
it's about context, see what's happening in India now?
that's the fear is this isn't the end of this disaster, just the start
so we've taken a very big leap of faith because it's the best calculated risk we have right now
most people may well shrug off their first covid case
but the 2nd case not so much and the 3rd even less
that's what you could get if this virus gets ensconced and mutating on a regular basis
it's about context, see what's happening in India now?
that's the fear is this isn't the end of this disaster, just the start
so we've taken a very big leap of faith because it's the best calculated risk we have right now
most people may well shrug off their first covid case
but the 2nd case not so much and the 3rd even less
that's what you could get if this virus gets ensconced and mutating on a regular basis
TychoMonolyth
Boreal Curing
Oh god.... globalresearch.ca is the National Enquirer of Canada. If you want to be taken seriously, don't quote them.
CaptainDankness
Well-known member
Considering the Spanish Flu killed a whole hell of a lot more people than Covid-19 and just basically went away, it's most likely not the end of the world. The Spanish Flu never really went away, we probably have it's relatives today.
Or maybe we'll go extinct by a virus that doesn't even give symptoms to like 40% of people.
absolutely!
Traditionally the military has served as a trial population. Those who participated in the trial dosages were compensated.
Your description of this as a mass experiment discounts what the result would be if nothing were done.
There are well over 20 different vaccines available from a variety sources, that are each unique unto themselves.
To frame it as if only a single vaccine is being used is less than correct.
Did fentynal and opoids just go away with wuflu?
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
Abstract
Background:
After COVID-19 emerged on U.S shores, providers began reviewing the emerging basic science, translational, and clinical data to identify potentially effective treatment options. In addition, a multitude of both novel and repurposed therapeutic agents were used empirically and studied within clinical trials.
Areas of Uncertainty:
The majority of trialed agents have failed to provide reproducible, definitive proof of efficacy in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 with the exception of corticosteroids in moderate to severe disease. Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits. Given some have not passed peer review, several expert groups including Unitaid/World Health Organization have undertaken a systematic global effort to contact all active trial investigators to rapidly gather the data needed to grade and perform meta-analyses.
Data Sources:
Data were sourced from published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts posted to preprint servers, expert meta-analyses, and numerous epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution campaigns.
Therapeutic Advances:
A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
Graphic of Peru when it was used and after they stopped
Abstract
Background:
After COVID-19 emerged on U.S shores, providers began reviewing the emerging basic science, translational, and clinical data to identify potentially effective treatment options. In addition, a multitude of both novel and repurposed therapeutic agents were used empirically and studied within clinical trials.
Areas of Uncertainty:
The majority of trialed agents have failed to provide reproducible, definitive proof of efficacy in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 with the exception of corticosteroids in moderate to severe disease. Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits. Given some have not passed peer review, several expert groups including Unitaid/World Health Organization have undertaken a systematic global effort to contact all active trial investigators to rapidly gather the data needed to grade and perform meta-analyses.
Data Sources:
Data were sourced from published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts posted to preprint servers, expert meta-analyses, and numerous epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution campaigns.
Therapeutic Advances:
A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
Graphic of Peru when it was used and after they stopped
This was the condition to use the vaccines by the FDA
“There is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the emergency use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19.”
The efficacy of Ivermectin has already shown in several countries, so why pushing the vaccines to the public is actually illegal.
“There is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the emergency use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19.”
The efficacy of Ivermectin has already shown in several countries, so why pushing the vaccines to the public is actually illegal.
im not saying it wouldn't be great to have a vaccine, im saying this vaccine is still in the experimental stage, as its still being trailed on humans. this has nothing to do with what would or wouldn't happen in the future. how does it stop being a mass human trail? by letting the trail be completed in 2023?
so yeah, it doesn't change the facts that we could really use a vaccine about now, but it also doesn't stop being a massive human experiment. just because it would save us if we had a effective product.
No, in my area... we now have state funded single room occupancy hotels for the unhoused
they serve fentanyl and cocaine 24/7.
by they I mean the hotels have one or two dealers who have set up shop... most of the unhoused are merely residing in a drug den at no fault of their own
well many of would very much appreciate public health and govt officials presenting the covid situation in a truthful and adult manner....
Public health officials are making policy choices for the rest of us and arrogantly refusing to have adult conversations about the pros and cons (aka risk assessments)
Instead they dismiss any questions/concerns (even from other reputable phds in their own field) about the vaccine as wild conspiracy that must be censored. It’s quite dystopian.
Switcher56
Comfortably numb!
what difference does it make if there is 100 vaccines, if they are all untested in terms of safety, ie. non of the vaccines have had more then a few months of human trails behind them. even the Cuban vaccine is brand new. yes its not made with mrna tech, but it still hasn't had the normal multi year trails that you go through either.
Switcher56
Comfortably numb!
