Charles Xavier
Member
Greetings.
How deep are these murky waters?
Well...let us wade right in and find out.
Is hermaphroditic expression possible in the male form?
Yes.
Can the male form produce seed?
No.
There is a tremendous difference between phenotypic expression (pistillate/staminate) and genotypic code (carpellate/non-carpellate).
I will attempt to keep this simple: What is needed to bear viable seed is more than the flowering hormones that govern expression, the genes that code for the formation of the ovule (and the ovary) are also necessary (and they don't spontaneously arise on a true male plant because it was exposed to female hormones).
Mohan Ram's work is based on a less complete understanding of sexual expression in Cannabis. The point that is often not cited is: in the experimentation, not every male plant that showed female flowers was then able to bear seed....just the occasional one.
As an explanation, this statement is now widely accepted: The plants in question were not true males, rather they were an extreme expression of the intersex trait (hermaphrodites).
Hermaphrodites that produce staminate flowers first and then pistillate ones are rare (because they are usually sterile), but they do exist and it is this that accounts for the misconcept of the 'male seedbearing plant'.
An aside: There are no naturally occurring conditions that will cause a male plant to produce female flowers.
Sincerely,
Charles.
How deep are these murky waters?
Well...let us wade right in and find out.
Is hermaphroditic expression possible in the male form?
Yes.
Can the male form produce seed?
No.
There is a tremendous difference between phenotypic expression (pistillate/staminate) and genotypic code (carpellate/non-carpellate).
I will attempt to keep this simple: What is needed to bear viable seed is more than the flowering hormones that govern expression, the genes that code for the formation of the ovule (and the ovary) are also necessary (and they don't spontaneously arise on a true male plant because it was exposed to female hormones).
Mohan Ram's work is based on a less complete understanding of sexual expression in Cannabis. The point that is often not cited is: in the experimentation, not every male plant that showed female flowers was then able to bear seed....just the occasional one.
As an explanation, this statement is now widely accepted: The plants in question were not true males, rather they were an extreme expression of the intersex trait (hermaphrodites).
Hermaphrodites that produce staminate flowers first and then pistillate ones are rare (because they are usually sterile), but they do exist and it is this that accounts for the misconcept of the 'male seedbearing plant'.
An aside: There are no naturally occurring conditions that will cause a male plant to produce female flowers.
Sincerely,
Charles.