CrescentFresh
New member
in 2012 you could browse budgenius and sclabs for the thc% of samples
my current understanding - (pure conjecture) is that labs are less than scientific in their calculating / reporting
allegedly - labs inflate their numbers (if the truth is that sample X = 12% THC -- the lab will just say "sample X = 22% THC")
and that this is manditory to stay in business as a testing lab. How can an honest lab compete? When the testing lab next door (dishonestly) gives every sample a high THC %?
I'm basing this entirely on the guests of the PotCast - nobody has contradicted this view (that I am aware of)
so what are we waiting for? Nobody wants to complain and demand lab transparency?
what am I missing here?
what am I on - CrazyPills?
my current understanding - (pure conjecture) is that labs are less than scientific in their calculating / reporting
allegedly - labs inflate their numbers (if the truth is that sample X = 12% THC -- the lab will just say "sample X = 22% THC")
and that this is manditory to stay in business as a testing lab. How can an honest lab compete? When the testing lab next door (dishonestly) gives every sample a high THC %?
I'm basing this entirely on the guests of the PotCast - nobody has contradicted this view (that I am aware of)
so what are we waiting for? Nobody wants to complain and demand lab transparency?
what am I missing here?
what am I on - CrazyPills?