It's illegal... schedule 1. That's the biggest regulation we got. And why does everybody have to die to make your point?
People need to die to prove your point of UNSAFE and need for regulation.
If people aren't getting killed or injured from a product where is your rational for regulation?
Is this a product that regulation can make safer? If so a baseline of its unsafe nature would be known to us, what is the danger regulation will save us from? How expensive will this regulation be?
Prohibition is not regulation, so your schedule I argument seems odd. If schedule I was the greatest regulation and lead to the greatest safety why wouldn't all other substances on that list be as benign as cannabis?
I really enjoy discussing gardening over politics with you.
![joint :joint: :joint:](/data/assets/smilies/joint.gif)