What's new

U.S. demands Apple unlock phone in NYC drug case

R

Robrites

The Department of Justice said Friday it is moving forward on a separate legal front to force Apple's assistance in unlocking the iPhone linked to a drug conspiracy case in New York City.
In a one-page letter filed in a New York federal court, Justice lawyers said the government "continues to require Apple's assistance in accessing the data'' on the iPhone of Jun Feng, a Queens, N.Y. suspect who pleaded guilty in a methamphetamine conspiracy case.
The Brooklyn federal court filing comes a week after the government abruptly withdrew from a similar high-profile legal challenge in California after the FBI was able to access the contents of the iPhone used by San Bernardino terrorist Syed Farook, using a method developed by an undisclosed outside party.
The government's position signals a continuing legal battle that pits privacy issues against law enforcement security concerns. The issue has drawn contrasting legal arguments from tech companies, civil liberties experts and law enforcement officials across the nation and beyond.
The smartphone in the Brooklyn federal court case is an iPhone 5S, running on Apple’s iOS7 operating system. Both the model and operating system are different than iPhone in the San Bernardino case.
Federal investigators ran tests to determine whether the third-party method that enabled them to extract to data from the San Bernardino case iPhone would work on other Apple models, a senior law enforcement official said Friday.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the government representative was not authorized to comment publicly on the pending legal matter.
Asked specifically whether investigators had tested the third-party extraction method on the iPhone in the Brooklyn case, the official cited FBI Director James Comey’s Wednesday statement that the method only works on a "narrow slice" of iPhones, not all models.
Apple attorneys said Friday that the company, while disappointed with the government's decision to proceed in the Brooklyn case, would defend its position in court and attempt to force the FBI to disclose the method it used to unlock the San Bernardino phone. The company wants to ensure that the government had exhausted all options for accessing the contents of the phone in the drug case.
The attorneys, who spoke on the condition that Apple's representatives not be publicly identified, asserted that a full vetting of the method used by the FBI in the San Bernardino investigation would be a core part of Apple's legal strategy in Brooklyn.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/04/08/justice-moving-forward-separate-apple-case/82788824/
 
This shit sounds like lies to make both Apple and the government look good.

First, Apple is pretending that they won't give up info to the government. Second, the government is pretending that they can't get into an iPhone, or that it's immoral to "hack" into it.

The American sheeple see Apple as the hero while getting a subliminal message that the government always uses permission and proper procedure to acquire evidence. Also, it gives the false impression that a fucking iPhone is the most secure phone on earth.

Laughable.
 
Exactly. Its politics. These companies have been ordered to be backdoored for so long then they destroyed the ones that didnt comply like truecrypt.
 
R

Robrites

This shit sounds like lies to make both Apple and the government look good.

First, Apple is pretending that they won't give up info to the government. Second, the government is pretending that they can't get into an iPhone, or that it's immoral to "hack" into it.

The American sheeple see Apple as the hero while getting a subliminal message that the government always uses permission and proper procedure to acquire evidence. Also, it gives the false impression that a fucking iPhone is the most secure phone on earth.

Laughable.

U Smarter Than Most.
 
Exactly. Its politics. These companies have been ordered to be backdoored for so long then they destroyed the ones that didnt comply like truecrypt.

There was a phone out there - I forget the name - but supposedly it costs like $3k and they utilize serious encryption and special privacy measures and there is no back door.

This was a year ago anyway. It could've been the Truecrypt you're talking about for all I know.

People who had those phones where the ones who blew the whistle on those stinger cell-towers the gov & LEO were using out on the east coast.. These fake devices that mimic a cell tower and when your phone connects they can tell whose device it is.. Well, people with those phones could see that some foreign device was trying to connect to their phones and eventually traced it & found out that it was these stingers so they blew the covers off that via blogs & social media.. Which is good - using tech against them!

Interesting shit.

The best options we have for our defense are scramblers & jammers.. And of course they made the use of those types of devices into a federal crime. lol
 

shithawk420

Well-known member
Veteran
Yup.I knew the whole reason for this shit was drugs.as long as drugs are involved the government can go up your ass with a fine toothed comb.
 

MJPassion

Observer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
If phones were just phones instead of hand held computers mixed with tracking devices & snooping software...

This would be a non issue!
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top