This is unfortunate. The thread has some great concerns that could/should be brought to light in the community.
Wouldn't an absolute have less terpenes than concrete? Could medicinal quality in fact be diminished by such?
I'm just playing devil's advocate to get to put things into perspective. I would also consider an absolute to be a cleaner product, but I often wonder at what cost? Flowers seems to have the most medicinal content, and nature has provided it to us, but their power cannot compare to concentrates, and ROA becomes a problem with any serious tolerance.
Could vaporized dry sift be some middle ground? I personally prefer thin layer evap'd crumble over low heat. For flavor as well as ease of use. Winterization has given me mixed results, none of which provided any actual absolute, at least by looks alone.
Not all medicine is relevant to a patient. Just because quinine helps prevent malaria doesn't mean that I need it in my antibiotics if I don't have it. Some patients need terpenes to aid in the metabolic pathway and in achieving many of the common effects of being high...but many don't.
Example: My mother stands to benefit from THC, CBN, and CBG lowering her eye pressure. The inclusion of terpenoids/flavonoids tends to have an increased effect on reducing blood pressure (which is bad for her) as well as makes her feel high which is not something she tolerates. I would much rather give her tiny doses of a decarboxylated oil which has lost many of these compounds to heat.
Terpenes are not a gold standard and I think there's a bit of an obsession going on with them. Yes they are what gives smell, flavor, potency, etc., but you have to remember that there are HUNDREDS of compounds in the plant and only a handful of them are known to do anything in particular. Just as I would not smoke the bark of a cinchona tree to get quinine into my system, I would not smoke weed or shatter just to get thc in my system if it were a matter of life and death. The problem: it often is.