sladan said:I read some rumors about the (semi-) autoflowering trait some stuporsonic phenotypes have.
someone made some experiences with that strain?
Are there af phenotypes in Sagarmatha's stuporsonic?
sladan said:ok, at least some of them are at least semi- af
a grow report would be nice!
do you grow stuporsonic seeds from sagarmatha?
the Rock said:so thule are you saying growing stupersonic outdoors is not a good idea,will they veg properly or just try to flower year round<>I am confused any help would be appreciated as I was gonna start a batch outdoors soon
I just don't get this. I heard a few months back Sag was offering Stupersonic but they took it off their website quite awhile ago. A friend gave me some Stupersonic beans about three years ago and even then it was not directly available...just old stock held by distributors. Back when I got em the Sag site said they were going to make it available again.Much better for our climate than the ones sagarmatha is selling now imo.
AF can be defined in different ways. One definition of a "true AF" strain would be that all plants will flower indoors under 24/0. (Or 24/7 as some say.) Stuporsonic isn't a true AF.LifeCycle said:here are a couple piks of my 2 stuporsonics to young to tell about the AF right now the light are on 24/7
Hans Blix said:AF can be defined in different ways. One definition of a "true AF" strain would be that all plants will flower indoors under 24/0. (Or 24/7 as some say.) Stuporsonic isn't a true AF.
thule said:Mine are mutants too. The leaves are really dark green and deformed. Sometimes they grow out of it so I'll give 'em some time. I think this is a very inbred line. Inbred but not stable.[/quote:
This lack of stability leads often leads to great variations in phenotypes. For example, When I grew out Reeferman's Nigerian Nighmare, some plants autoflowered on me within 2-3 weeks under 24/0, but some just kept vegging. I have not grown out stuporsonic myself, so I cannot say with confidence that there is one or more AF phenotypes in the line. I merely draw my conclusion of this from the research I've done on it when I was considering it for a breeding project.
Check out IrishSoCo's thread on photosensitive strains. There was a lot of good info posted in there by several members and lots of clarification on the topic. If I remember correctly, there is info on Stuporsonic in there as well.
happy growing everybody
Hans Blix said:AF can be defined in different ways. One definition of a "true AF" strain would be that all plants will flower indoors under 24/0. (Or 24/7 as some say.) Stuporsonic isn't a true AF.
Yes. I think we are basically in agreement. What I meant was that you can come across different definitions of autoflowering, and that the term is often used loosely.FirstTracks said:I disagree that AF can really be defined in different ways. IMHO, an autoflowering plant reaches sexual maturity and flowers in a set period of time regardless of photoperiod.
People often confuse photosensitive characteristics with autoflowering characteristics, and this is where we usually see the discrepancies in the definition of what a true AF is.