Well like I said the info I just typed is from the Urban Gardener mag. There is much more I just don't want to type it all. As for the scientific studies they are in the mag and like I said before aswell the rats are showing signs of BLACK LIVER SPOTS from eating this GMF. I would suggest you get the magazine and read the whole article yourself before calling "bullshit"peace out Headband707In other words, the website you are quoting is drawing disfavorable correlations from disparate data suggesting that there is a inferential link between various increases in a whole slew of statistics reported by public health authorities. This is to be inferred, even though no ill health effects from genetically modified foods of any sort in double blind testing using universally accepted scientific standards and control groups, when the foods are actually tested are ever demonstrated.
Which is another way of saying that the inference you are asking us to draw is, in fact, bullshit.
By presenting an inferential argument without any hard science demonstrating a causative link, you're just dressing up political opinion and putting it forward as scientific fact to persuade people to twitch their knees. This is what the Prohibitionists do all the time in relation to MJ. It's the core of the gateway drug argument.
So the Prohibitionists are wrong to do so - but those who are against genetically modified produce - or irradiated food preservation - are right to do so? An interesting shifting standard you appear to be applying there.
I prefer a standard which evaluates all science by the same rules; a scientific standard which does not seek to twist statistics to dress up opinion in an attempt to pass it off as scientific fact.
Because while everyone is entitled to their own opinion, nobody is entitled to their own facts. There is a bright line separating those two concepts.
Magazine is Urban Gardener issue Nov/Dec 09 and on the front cover it says " The Big GMO cover-up , What you don't know can hurt you.