LED GIRL, what are your thoughts on the following:
I don't want to get in the middle of anything, I just want to share my thought with everyone.
I've been following LEDs closely for a while, I knew it was coming long ago, as I'm sure many of you did. At first I saw the purplish hue of the light and chuckled, thinking people must be downright idiots to buy into LED . . .
But little by little I saw results, not with cannabis, primarily with leafy veggies like lettuce and cabbage grown hydroponically. The results weren't astounding, but they were there . . .
Now I had a chance to meet a man (and a company) growing under an LED side by side with a 400 watt halide. He's been doing this "demo" in his storefront since April, I don't want to reveal the store or it's location, as this is a not an MMJ friendly state and I'd rather have people think me a liar than give away too much info . . . .
Anyways, its right there in the store front, and has been for a little under a year. I talked to the owned of the establishment recently regarding what he thought about LEDs and their future in horticulture and he told me that there are some immense benefits to LED. First is no wasted light, all the light emitted is within the plants usable spectrum. We all know this. He said the lifespan of the diodes is outstanding, very long life and very reliable performance, greatly outlasting any HID bulb as well as florescents . . . we knew this also. He said there is less heat produced with LEDS and that it typically flows right out the top of the fixture, although he did say it was more heat than he expected . .. but still less than HID.
He said it had drawbacks also, like lumens per watt was less far than impressive, but again all usable to the plants. He also said you had to keep the fixture very close to see growth rates comparable to the MH (which was placed 24" away) but that if you did so growth was excellent.
Our conversation lasted maybe 25 minutes and we spent the last of it talking about the future and his honest thoughts. He told me LEDs are great for people who can't afford the heat, that they are a great alternative and definitely a viable option, but for people who can control the heat and have a history with HID we may not get quite the results we've come to expect - it's just not quite the same he said.
He said that if he dropped the 400 MH lamp down to less than 15" and cooled it with an aircooled hood it outperformed the LEDs substantially, which makes sense because of the inverse square law, right? So that's a no brainer, but still you can't get the LEDs closer than what they were, meaning the LED system is fixed in that at point-blank in compared to 400 watt halide system about 2 feet away, but move the halide closer, and BAM, out-performs LEDs considerably . . . (again this is obvious, right?)
He said the main drawback is intensity. The amount of diodes required to equal a MH that is placed closer than 18" is still a little larger in total "area" than he'd like, meaning the fixture has such a large "footprint" that it's simply not possible to get the same amount of LED light to fall in a given area as HID light (provided you drop the HID down lower), and that given than fact HIDs will outperform LEDs until some technological change allowing more lumens per watt of LED light.
These are all his thoughts and experiences, not mine, I just wanted to share them as this guy was a very knowledgeable individual with a great deal of experience. He said that he still thinks LED will have role in the future and may even BE the future, adding that he had no crystal ball, and that in the long term not having to replace the diodes (or ballast, or bulbs) as well as reduced wattage because of more PAR light per watt aids in making the cost of an LED more realistic . . . but that right now, with what's currently available, it's cheaper to to cool an HID light and keep it closer than to invest in LED, and he said his experience in doing so has shown significantly better results with the HID . . . but with the HID not cooled and 24" away the results favored the LEDs . . .
I don't want to get in the middle of anything, I just want to share my thought with everyone.
I've been following LEDs closely for a while, I knew it was coming long ago, as I'm sure many of you did. At first I saw the purplish hue of the light and chuckled, thinking people must be downright idiots to buy into LED . . .
But little by little I saw results, not with cannabis, primarily with leafy veggies like lettuce and cabbage grown hydroponically. The results weren't astounding, but they were there . . .
Now I had a chance to meet a man (and a company) growing under an LED side by side with a 400 watt halide. He's been doing this "demo" in his storefront since April, I don't want to reveal the store or it's location, as this is a not an MMJ friendly state and I'd rather have people think me a liar than give away too much info . . . .
Anyways, its right there in the store front, and has been for a little under a year. I talked to the owned of the establishment recently regarding what he thought about LEDs and their future in horticulture and he told me that there are some immense benefits to LED. First is no wasted light, all the light emitted is within the plants usable spectrum. We all know this. He said the lifespan of the diodes is outstanding, very long life and very reliable performance, greatly outlasting any HID bulb as well as florescents . . . we knew this also. He said there is less heat produced with LEDS and that it typically flows right out the top of the fixture, although he did say it was more heat than he expected . .. but still less than HID.
He said it had drawbacks also, like lumens per watt was less far than impressive, but again all usable to the plants. He also said you had to keep the fixture very close to see growth rates comparable to the MH (which was placed 24" away) but that if you did so growth was excellent.
Our conversation lasted maybe 25 minutes and we spent the last of it talking about the future and his honest thoughts. He told me LEDs are great for people who can't afford the heat, that they are a great alternative and definitely a viable option, but for people who can control the heat and have a history with HID we may not get quite the results we've come to expect - it's just not quite the same he said.
He said that if he dropped the 400 MH lamp down to less than 15" and cooled it with an aircooled hood it outperformed the LEDs substantially, which makes sense because of the inverse square law, right? So that's a no brainer, but still you can't get the LEDs closer than what they were, meaning the LED system is fixed in that at point-blank in compared to 400 watt halide system about 2 feet away, but move the halide closer, and BAM, out-performs LEDs considerably . . . (again this is obvious, right?)
He said the main drawback is intensity. The amount of diodes required to equal a MH that is placed closer than 18" is still a little larger in total "area" than he'd like, meaning the fixture has such a large "footprint" that it's simply not possible to get the same amount of LED light to fall in a given area as HID light (provided you drop the HID down lower), and that given than fact HIDs will outperform LEDs until some technological change allowing more lumens per watt of LED light.
These are all his thoughts and experiences, not mine, I just wanted to share them as this guy was a very knowledgeable individual with a great deal of experience. He said that he still thinks LED will have role in the future and may even BE the future, adding that he had no crystal ball, and that in the long term not having to replace the diodes (or ballast, or bulbs) as well as reduced wattage because of more PAR light per watt aids in making the cost of an LED more realistic . . . but that right now, with what's currently available, it's cheaper to to cool an HID light and keep it closer than to invest in LED, and he said his experience in doing so has shown significantly better results with the HID . . . but with the HID not cooled and 24" away the results favored the LEDs . . .