Nice, that Hillary is the Head of the State Department right now! Take a good look at all the links I have posted..then come talk to me..peace! I repeat..END THE FED! ~~RON PAUL is the man! Only one to have the guts to say it..and do what needs done! monkey5
Where did "DiscoBiscuit" go? You still lurking? I know I have "OUTED" your party completly..sorry! END THE FED! ~~ RON PAUL 2012 ..Thank you all for thinking! Every American should be talking about this! Feel free to share all I have posted! monkey5
.Newt Gingrich Blasts Ron Paul, Mitt Romney
By SHANNON McCAFFREY 12/27/11 09:13 PM ET
DES MOINES, Iowa -- No more Mr. Nice Guy. Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich lambasted two of his top GOP rivals on Tuesday, despite his claim that he's sticking to a positive campaign.
Gingrich said he couldn't vote for Ron Paul if he were to become the GOP nominee and called the Texas congressman's views "totally outside the mainstream of every decent American."
In the same interview on CNN, Gingrich also offered a testy rebuke to Mitt Romney, saying that if Romney wants to run a negative campaign attacking Gingrich he should at least be "man enough to own it."
The sharp comments come as the former House speaker has seen his support slip in Iowa amid a barrage of attack ads that have cast him as an ethically challenged Washington insider.
Scrambling to regain momentum, Gingrich and a political action committee supporting him each took the wraps off television spots that will run statewide in Iowa.
The PAC Winning the Future is composed of former Gingrich staffers. The ad, its first, includes a broadside at Romney, although the former Massachusetts governor is never named.
"The Republican establishment wants to pick our candidate," the ad says. "When a principled conservative took the lead, they outspent Newt Gingrich 20 to 1, attacking him with falsehoods. ... Don't let the liberal Republican establishment pick our candidate."
Gingrich has said he will disavow any independent political action committee that spends money on negative ads. His own spot, funded by his campaign coffers, focuses on jobs and economic growth.
The former Georgia congressman launched a 22-stop "Jobs and Prosperity" bus tour, which kicked off Tuesday in Dubuque, in the northeast corner of Iowa. But he found himself on the defensive again on health care as a new memo surfaces that showed he had once praised the law enacted in Massachusetts when Romney was governor.
In an April 2006 memo from Gingrich's Atlanta-based Center for Health Transformation, he called it "the most exciting development of the past few weeks." He also said the law had "tremendous potential to effect major change in the American health system."
The memo also noted shortcomings in the Massachusetts law.
Gingrich said the state's many regulations prohibited insurers from offering cheaper plans that would make coverage affordable. But he went on to note that that "we agree entirely with Gov. Romney and Massachusetts legislators that our goal should be 100 percent insurance coverage for all Americans."
Gingrich and others have argued that the Massachusetts law, widely seen as the model for President Barack Obama's national health overhaul, undercuts Romney's conservative credentials.
Gingrich also has faced questions about his past support for an individual health care mandate, anathema to conservatives.
A Gingrich spokesman said Gingrich's comments are "old news that has been covered already."
"Newt previously supported a mandate for health insurance and changed his mind after seeing its effects," said the spokesman, R.C. Hammond. "The real question is why `Mitt the Massachusetts Moderate' won't admit that health insurance mandates don't work."
The Gingrich memo was first reported Tuesday by The Wall Street Journal.
Personally i believe Eisenhower spoke of the dangers of a growing 'Military Industrial Complex'; Kennedy tried to end it (after a the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, and then the Cuban Missile Crisis) and was killed for it, and the same 'administration' has been running things since Nov 22, 1963.
There were 3 future Presidents in Dallas that day. LBJ, Nixon, and GHWB. GHWB has given multiple accounts of his whereabouts on that day, and finally settled on 'I cant remember'.
Some say this is a picture of GHWB
Check out Zapata Oil, its a company founded in 1953 by GHWB. Boats owned by the company (one named Barbara) were used in the Bay of Pigs invasion. The company also has ties to Watergate and Iran Contra.
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Baker have been running shit for a long time.
Bush became head of CIA under Carter.
Ronald Reagan really was a 'movie star' president, even the staunchest republican will admit he was losing his mental capacity the last year(s) of is presidency.oo).
http://wfmu.org/playlists/DX
glad you posted this. Any members more interested in learning about zapata oil or arbusto(means bush in spanish) oil, t the younger bush first energy.company, founded at least in part from money invested by the bin laden family texas business representative, a man bush was in the sure national gated with should check out Dave Emory and his extensive research into the underground reich, prescott bush and others dealings with, market manipulation after the jfk assasination and 911.
As for newt and drug laws? there is no debate on his shameful stance
Moe: (answers phone) Moe's rat-free tavern. Oh, uh, hey, Marge. Yeah, yeah Homer's here.
(Homer gestures "no")
Moe: Oh, oh you want Homer! Oh, I'm sorry I thought you meant "Himmler." Heinrich Himmler. You know, the guy who invented the "Heimlich maneuver?"
Marge: Those are two different people!
Moe: Yeah, well, they're both here and neither one is your husband. This press conference is over. (hangs up)
====
Gingrich is the most "establishment" candidate ever to run for president. If he is elected, we are sure to see more of the same. Exponential growth of the federal government in every aspect, more war, more debt, more everything the federal gov't produces. Parasitism.
Ever thought about how Paul would manage ending the fed? Has Paul ever offered how he'll manage? Nope.
What he (RON PAUL) is for is a commodity backed dollar ,and by that he means multiple commodities like gold & silver,that way no-one can corner the market,you could actually use a completley unbacked dollar like lincon did (greenbacks) wich was only used because people in this country agreed that they would use it for the payment of debts and to purchase goods ,it was backed with only the full faith and credit of the united states.
In england they actually used wood sticks (tally sticks) to pay taxes.
Now would he stand to make money if we switched yes,but he's been preaching about the federal reserve for years he knows they manipulate the money supply to create booms and busts,and to tell every one to follow your advice and not be taking your own advice would be out of touch,espeacially with dr.paul .
I think a better question is why did nixon close the gold window and why does the federal reserve store gold,and why isnt their a annual audit of fort knox.
http://www.thepoliticalguide.com/Pr...xico/Gary_Johnson/views/The_Federal_Reserve/;
Federal Reserve
Governor Johnson has stated that the actions of the Federal Reserve Bank should be more transparent and that it needs to be reviewed and managed effectively. Governor Johnson blames the Federal Reserve Bank for the housing bubble, but also credits them with mitigating that bust. He states that the American people deserve to know the extent to which the Fed has purchased private assets at home and abroad to help ensure that the value of the dollar is not deminished further.
Although he has called for more transparency, he does not feel that the Federal Reserve Bank should be abolished. He is also hesitant about regulating the bank as that would put politicians such as Barney Frank in charge of greater economic power.
SPENDING AND THE DEFICIT
Government spends too much because it does too much. Unchecked deficits are the single greatest threat to our national security. Unless we take significant steps soon, our federal debt will equal the entire economic production of the United States.
We should start by reassessing the role of the federal government, and always asking the question: Should the government be doing this in the first place?
We must act now to:
Gary Johnson says,
The Federal Reserve Bank needs to be reviewed and managed effectively. The actions of the Federal Reserve should be transparent. Congress should take a close look at how the Federal Reserve Bank is operated and regulated. If changes need to be made within the Federal Reserve Bank, they should be made.
but I still don't see his suggestions for the fix? Very ambiguous. I like transparency, better managed, and audited frequently, but I prefer that we find some way to abolish the privatized aspects of the FED or end it. Changes should be made but what kind? If not more gov't oversight then how to control it? I say open audit them and make them return all undisclosed funds pronto. Considering that is 16 TRILLION, we could pay off a lot of bills. They are using it to run the largest ponzi scheme in history. We can't allow that to continue.
NOW LET'S SEE WHO (DISCOBISCUIT) CONTINUES TO IGNORE WHOM. why? Because I insisted he pony up a candidate if he wanted to continuously derail mine. Now instead of re-posting my quotes and taking them out of context while he present negatives about RP fixes and suggestions. I am only trying to have a discussion. Are you taking your computer and going home on me now?