You neglected to mention the sole reason Sweden went
after him. It was at the behest of the CIA.
Would like to think it was an innocent omission...
leaking government crimes is goodyou have no first amendment protections when distributing information you came by illegally. JMHO. prove me wrong...
Why would he need first amendment protection when he's Australian? You may still not understand what journalism is, nor what it entails.you have no first amendment protections when distributing information you came by illegally. JMHO. prove me wrong...
i agree. but do you expect for everyone to ignore HOW you got the information you exposed? i think that one should stand up and take responsibility for an action they believe to be "in the public good". a military member has the right to disobey a direct order, but they stand trial for that . part of the deal... what happened to the ethos of "i regret that i have but one life..."leaking government crimes is good
i didn't advocate for his 1st amendment rights. i've got a pretty good grasp on journalism (i think, lol) . want to discuss taking responsibility for ones actions ?Why would he need first amendment protection when he's Australian? You may still not understand what journalism is, nor what it entails.
Publishing information that the public needs and has a right to know is the highest and most important function of non-fascist journalism. That often includes information that the military complex and bloodsucking politicians don't want us to know. The press is supposed to dig these things up and let us know about them. It's why papers have names like Monitor, Free Press, Bulldog, etc. So, no, those who do that type of journalism are not to be punished in a free society.i didn't advocate for his 1st amendment rights. i've got a pretty good grasp on journalism (i think, lol) . want to discuss taking responsibility for ones actions ?
no limits on how? really? want to think on that for a bit? because i see problems ahead...So, no, those who do that type of journalism are not to be punished in a free society.
For you to pretend I said no limits is a strawman argument. Have at it.no limits on how? really? want to think on that for a bit? because i see problems ahead...