Heady; In this case the 'sugars' or various carbon molecular structures are put out by the plants, as I read it.
yes, that's what i was trying to say. sorry if it was confusing.
one thing i'm still unclear on is if the carbohydrates in molasses attract the same bacteria that root exudates do. and if so, do the carbohydrates in molasses directly benefit (or at least expand) the bacteria/archaea population when watered in? and does that benefit the soil food web or throw it out of balance?
I'd love to have an electron microscope.
I think if one searches here they will find it being said or eluded to quite a bit.I have never heard that BS molasses was thought to feed mycorrhizal fungi.
True blackstrap contains a considerable amount of cyclic hydroxamic acids which is got from the plants it was derived from. I think you will find that the substance is indeed a chelating agent.I don't think BSM acts to chelate nutrients but I'm willing to learn if there is legitimate evidence of this.
To most here a micro-herd is a micro-herd.
I think if one searches here they will find it being said or eluded to quite a bit.
It is conventional wisdom that I am talking about, not what actually happens under the microscope. I mean, how many here would know one beneficial from another...you and a half dozen others? To most here a micro-herd is a micro-herd.
True blackstrap contains a considerable amount of cyclic hydroxamic acids which is got from the plants it was derived from. I think you will find that the substance is indeed a chelating agent.
A quick look netted this...
http://ttkde4.sci.u-szeged.hu/ABS/2002/Acta HPb/s5/01-pet1.pdf