Yamaha FG-840
Active member
You missed where in the laws of thermodynamics, 29% less light into a planet must make 29% less come back out.
Have you looked at the North Pole lately?
- Thread starter igrowone
- Start date
You are correct sir! And i see he's been banned from other sites as well for narcissistically insulting others when they disagree with his crazy theory.
TychoMonolyth
Boreal Curing
I ignored him so I don't see his posts. I've seen enough to know that he believes scientists made a 29% error in their calculations.
This of course he discovered working his parents Lab (I think he meant to say 'basement').
This of course he discovered working his parents Lab (I think he meant to say 'basement').
Yamaha FG-840
Active member
That's what all the believers were telling me about 40 years ago when I told them pot isn't like heroin and they said - I'm gonna quote this directly from some ''you need some education'' literature of the times
''Cain'tchew sea awl thim signtsie fellurs,
what werks fur guvurmint playsis,
and has got thay own parkin' playse at wurk,
and has got bow ties an evurthang,
and repyatayshuns as minnuh signts
has dun tha critical signtific peer research
and othur fellurs what cain't be in on it,
has subjected it to critical signtific peer review?"
''Cain'tchew sea awl thim signtsie fellurs,
what werks fur guvurmint playsis,
and has got thay own parkin' playse at wurk,
and has got bow ties an evurthang,
and repyatayshuns as minnuh signts
has dun tha critical signtific peer research
and othur fellurs what cain't be in on it,
has subjected it to critical signtific peer review?"
It certainly beats acting like vast numbers of people who know what they are talking about are wrong.[/QUOTE said:
Yamaha FG-840
Active member
When your sole contribution to the conversation is name calling,
definitionally you're a troll, Koondense.
definitionally you're a troll, Koondense.
https://www.thegwpf.com/arctic-ice-growing-again/
Arctic Ice Growing Again
...........
https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2018/09/17/arctic-ice-recovery-update-sept-17/
Scientists show polar ‘polynya’ supported marine life during last Ice Age
The new study published in Nature Communications followed a collaborative project between researchers in Plymouth and Norway
Mr Alan Williams
Media & Communications Officer
27 September 2018
An oasis in the hostile Arctic Ocean sustained marine life and ocean circulation during the last Ice Age, according to a new study.
In the research, published in Nature Communications, scientists from Norway and the UK showed that 20,000 years ago, winter Arctic sea ice covered more than twice the area that it does today.
However, there was a small ice-free ‘polynya’ between the frozen continents and the open ocean where microscopic marine life prevailed, which would have provided otherwise unavailable food for fish and mammals.
The study was led by Geological Survey of Norway (NGU), the Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate at The Arctic University of Norway, and the Centre for Chemical Sciences at the University of Plymouth.
The researchers believe their findings are of international importance since they show the vulnerability of marine ecosystems in the northern oceans to periods of rapid climate change, but also their adaptability to various extreme climate states.
Jochen Knies, a research scientist from NGU and The Arctic University of Norway, is the study’s lead author. He said:
Back in their respective laboratories, the Norwegian scientists set about dating the core and analysing fossilised remains of biological organisms preserved within it, while the Plymouth group performed analysis of the chemical ‘fingerprints’ of the algae living in the region in the past.
The results revealed that the polynya was sustained for at least 5,000 years, when the surroundings were largely covered by ice, and global ocean circulation was at a minimum.
During a subsequent period of abrupt climate change around 17,500 years ago, cold freshwater from the melting ice caps caused the entire northern oceans to be covered by thick sea ice and the polynya disappeared. This resulted in a dramatic decline in marine life and it took up to 2,000 years to recover.
Today, such polynyas are common around Antarctica and Greenland and form through a combination of offshore winds blowing from nearby ice sheets and warm water rising from the deep ocean.
In areas of extreme cold and little access to food, polynyas provide an oasis for marine mammals to survive and they are also critical for global ocean circulation.
Simon Belt, Professor of Chemistry in Plymouth, said:
..........
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6X6yfFMt0Y0
[youtubeif]6X6yfFMt0Y0[/youtubeif]
cult of climate catastrophists cannot contend with criticisms concerning the quackery of AGW.
would have someone banned rather than discover their own platitudes lack merit.
bots and trolls being deployed to distract, deny, denigrate, and destroy opposing literature, thought, and physical laws proving their disengenuity of open-minded discourse.
f'n ridiculous for adult minds to scrape the dregs of depravity to destroy discourse they so adamantly maintain cannot be proven.
Arctic Ice Growing Again
- Date: 18/09/18
- Ron Clutz, Science Matters
...........
https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2018/09/17/arctic-ice-recovery-update-sept-17/
Scientists show polar ‘polynya’ supported marine life during last Ice Age
The new study published in Nature Communications followed a collaborative project between researchers in Plymouth and Norway
Mr Alan Williams
Media & Communications Officer
27 September 2018
An oasis in the hostile Arctic Ocean sustained marine life and ocean circulation during the last Ice Age, according to a new study.
In the research, published in Nature Communications, scientists from Norway and the UK showed that 20,000 years ago, winter Arctic sea ice covered more than twice the area that it does today.
However, there was a small ice-free ‘polynya’ between the frozen continents and the open ocean where microscopic marine life prevailed, which would have provided otherwise unavailable food for fish and mammals.
The study was led by Geological Survey of Norway (NGU), the Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate at The Arctic University of Norway, and the Centre for Chemical Sciences at the University of Plymouth.
The researchers believe their findings are of international importance since they show the vulnerability of marine ecosystems in the northern oceans to periods of rapid climate change, but also their adaptability to various extreme climate states.
Jochen Knies, a research scientist from NGU and The Arctic University of Norway, is the study’s lead author. He said:
“We were looking for evidence of biological life in sediments at the bottom of the ocean. In doing so, we found that between the sea ice-covered oceans and the ice sheets on land, there must have been a small ice-free corridor that extended over hundreds of kilometres into the Arctic. Such ice-free regions are often called ‘polynyas’, a Russian expression for an area of open water that is surrounded by sea ice and/or ice sheets”.
The research first involved the retrieval of a sediment core from the bottom of the ocean in the south west Barents Sea, a region north of Norway of major importance for the fishing industry today.Back in their respective laboratories, the Norwegian scientists set about dating the core and analysing fossilised remains of biological organisms preserved within it, while the Plymouth group performed analysis of the chemical ‘fingerprints’ of the algae living in the region in the past.
The results revealed that the polynya was sustained for at least 5,000 years, when the surroundings were largely covered by ice, and global ocean circulation was at a minimum.
During a subsequent period of abrupt climate change around 17,500 years ago, cold freshwater from the melting ice caps caused the entire northern oceans to be covered by thick sea ice and the polynya disappeared. This resulted in a dramatic decline in marine life and it took up to 2,000 years to recover.
Today, such polynyas are common around Antarctica and Greenland and form through a combination of offshore winds blowing from nearby ice sheets and warm water rising from the deep ocean.
In areas of extreme cold and little access to food, polynyas provide an oasis for marine mammals to survive and they are also critical for global ocean circulation.
Simon Belt, Professor of Chemistry in Plymouth, said:
“Polynyas in the polar regions are common nowadays, but until now it has been really difficult to confirm their existence in the past. However, by finding chemical fossils of algae that live in the open ocean and in sea ice, we have shown that polynyas must have existed during the last Ice Age, providing us with an insight into how marine life survived during a period of otherwise extreme climate conditions.”
The full study – Nordic Seas polynyas and their role in preconditioning marine productivity during the Last Glacial Maximum by Jochen Knies, Denizcan Köseoğlu, Leif Rise, Nicole Baeten, Valerié K. Bellec, Reidulv Bøe, Martin Klug, Giuliana Panierie, Patrycja E. Jernas, Simon T. Belt is published in Nature Communications, dio: 10.1038/s41467-018-06252-8...........
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6X6yfFMt0Y0
[youtubeif]6X6yfFMt0Y0[/youtubeif]
cult of climate catastrophists cannot contend with criticisms concerning the quackery of AGW.
would have someone banned rather than discover their own platitudes lack merit.
bots and trolls being deployed to distract, deny, denigrate, and destroy opposing literature, thought, and physical laws proving their disengenuity of open-minded discourse.
f'n ridiculous for adult minds to scrape the dregs of depravity to destroy discourse they so adamantly maintain cannot be proven.
Yamaha FG-840
Active member
One of the magic gassers is name calling me names and placing ''infractions'' on my accounts.
https://i.imgur.com/b3RHA9v.png
https://i.imgur.com/b3RHA9v.png
TychoMonolyth
Boreal Curing
destroy discourse?
If someone doesn't believe science, it isn't a discourse. It's hopeless.
Dr: You have cancer.
You: No I don't.
Mechanic: That fuel's too hot. It'll burn your plugs.
You: No it won't.
Math teacher: You can't divide by zero.
You: Yes you can.
Buzz Aldrin: We landed on the moon.
You: No you didn't. Those pictures are fake.
(Buzz kicks you in the nuts)
If someone doesn't believe science, it isn't a discourse. It's hopeless.
Dr: You have cancer.
You: No I don't.
Mechanic: That fuel's too hot. It'll burn your plugs.
You: No it won't.
Math teacher: You can't divide by zero.
You: Yes you can.
Buzz Aldrin: We landed on the moon.
You: No you didn't. Those pictures are fake.
(Buzz kicks you in the nuts)
I ate enough brownies to feel like I was on opiates.
And the weather is all fucked up.
And the weather is all fucked up.
kickarse
Active member
Its 97% of climate scientists, that believe the bullshit, and they are only paid propaganda merchants, $$$$$ gimmie some $$$$$
there has never been a time of greater stupidity in the human race than now
although some of them God bother's from the old days go close
you modern bloke/lady/trannie's have got them all covered
wish i had a gif for ya's
there has never been a time of greater stupidity in the human race than now
although some of them God bother's from the old days go close
you modern bloke/lady/trannie's have got them all covered
wish i had a gif for ya's
TychoMonolyth
Boreal Curing
Got any proof of that, or is that just a guess?
Its 97% of climate scientists, that believe the bullshit, and they are only paid propaganda merchants, $$$$$ gimmie some $$$$$
there has never been a time of greater stupidity in the human race than now
although some of them God bother's from the old days go close
you modern bloke/lady/trannie's have got them all covered
wish i had a gif for ya's
who are they being paid by? the government? to what end? to get off fossil fuels? why is getting off fossil fuels bad?
why is it more likely to you that the government is falsifying science rather than fossil fuel companies employing junk scientists and conmen just as the cigarette industry did when we were first finding out the effects of smoking tobacco?
who stands to gain more? a heavily taxpayer subsidized and government protected fossil fuel industry or people who want to use various sorts of renewable energies which sparks competition in the energy marketplace?
Exxon studied climate change and kept the results classified/internal for 40 years
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/
i wonder why they would try to cover up information that would directly fuck with their long term profits hmmmmmm lol
Yamaha FG-840
Active member
Man tells another man ''29% less energy into rocks, never creates more than 100% energy out. It creates 29% less energy out."
Authority worshiper: Yes it does, less energy going into things makes more come back out every time less goes in, all the time
It's preposterous to think 29% less light in, equals 29% less out.''
If someone is so struck with belief in authority they can't face they're telling people less energy in makes more come out, the discourse is hopeless.
No it's not.
We can all make fun of you for believing in it, and being so deluded.
https://i.imgur.com/uiErnQb.png
Authority worshiper: Yes it does, less energy going into things makes more come back out every time less goes in, all the time
It's preposterous to think 29% less light in, equals 29% less out.''
If someone is so struck with belief in authority they can't face they're telling people less energy in makes more come out, the discourse is hopeless.
No it's not.
We can all make fun of you for believing in it, and being so deluded.
https://i.imgur.com/uiErnQb.png
Yamaha FG-840
Active member
Yamaha FG-840
Active member
Here's one of the hillbillies with a sparkly vest on.
https://i.imgur.com/fqyEYEv.png
Because signts.
https://i.imgur.com/fqyEYEv.png
Because signts.
Yamaha FG-840
Active member
When you have on a sparkly vest - saying less and less energy into things makes more and more come out isn't wrong,
https://i.imgur.com/OjDL9Pe.png
it's Signts-a-LisciouS.
https://i.imgur.com/OjDL9Pe.png
it's Signts-a-LisciouS.
...then show the results of your discourse adding to this conversation...
more in, but less out.
you berate the man who gives you the formula, tells you who theorized it, and in what year, yet disbelieve...nah, more than disbelieve, you try destroying his credibility without ever producing contradicting evidence, or even catching the fact that he gave you the answer he was asking for.
you bots are sharp...not!
more in, but less out.
you berate the man who gives you the formula, tells you who theorized it, and in what year, yet disbelieve...nah, more than disbelieve, you try destroying his credibility without ever producing contradicting evidence, or even catching the fact that he gave you the answer he was asking for.
you bots are sharp...not!
Yamaha FG-840
Active member
