all the drama when all we are trying to do is converse.
Meteorologist all over the WORLD are saying that the storm was geoengineered.
1 week prior to the hurricane (that i didnt know was coming till last minute) i had noticed CRAZY gridding going on in the sky which lead me to think that "they are doin something up there" so within a week a hurricane comes up the coast and slams into jersey. and i saw with my own eyes those cocksuckers grid the sky to (what looked like)control the direction of the storm. they did this all over coastal maine week prior to storm. If you think the Rockefellers are going to let bar harbor get hit by a bad storm haha yea right them dudes got enough money to control anything they want.
for real tho i want to know why the fuck they are spraying nano particles like crazy in grids east to west right before the hurricane
are these nano particles antennae that can be controlled via satelite or navy program? my buddy in the navy says its part of an advanced radar defense system but im not buying that shit... The whitehouse says its to curb global warming... so who the fuck is telling the truth??? what are these assholes spraying??? and what can we do to stop them
That guy is a scam artist, through and through.
no conspiracy theorist is gonna be hurt by this. heard it too many times...that and the tin hat thingy. childish but not unexpected, and unspoken i wasn't referring to you. you have been patient and persistent at the same time and that requires some discipline. take what you will from each of the posts i made...they are connected.Who did I call names? I have been posting in this thread a lot, so maybe I did and don't remember, but I don't think I've called anyone names. Conspiracy theorist, yeah, but I backed that up with a dictionary definition. I don't see that as being an inherently bad thing. We both know some conspiracy theories have been right over the years. Most of the evidence I've seen in this thread has been conjecture at best. That last video from trichrider started out promising until it ended with an angry preacher yelling at me about science he does not even understand. He shows a hole punch cloud and calls it a "haarp cloud."
The government didn't create global warming, mother nature did. As for trusting the government, where did I ever say that I trusted the government? In fact there is a post by me, further up this page where I said that just because I don't believe in these conspiracy theories doesn't mean I trust the government. That's okay though I know you don't really try and understand what people are saying. You just look to see if it seems like they're disagreeing with you and if so you start making riddiculous assertions that aren't even related to the topic.
So you consider the daily mail to be the beacon of truth huh? Wow I guess next you'll be telling us big foot is real because you saw a story about it in the National Enquirer?
oh!!! that explains your attitude. really now...It's only derogatory if the person it's directed at is a critical thinker. Just because you say there are secret societies controlling things and playing a smoke and mirrors game with the general public doesn't mean you're correct or a critical thinker.
i'm not trying to dispute AGW. this was never about that...it is about weather manipulation. a fact i have tried to establish with nothing but misdirection and denial. yes i said it...denial.Notice around 1950 on the time axis. The thick lines with anthropogenic(man made) and natural forcing (volcanoes, changes in the sun, natural cycle) go up and the thin lines (without anthropogenic forcing) go down. Basically different models that use different input parameters compared with each other. The thing you would want to pay attention to is the distance between the thick and thin lines of the same colors, as this attempts to distinguish between man made and natural change in climate.
Also, since you don't have any training in science I'm going to say this... These are models. This is only our approximation. I guess my opinion is this. We attempt to treat the earth better, reduce things that to the best of our collective knowledge harm the earth (read harm us...the earth will be just fine), protect our water and air, and waste less. The payoff is that some things become more expensive, like gas in california compared to texas or the cost of operating a coal burning power plant. Unfortunately this ripples into a lot of other things like plastics. This extra cost to manufacturers is then shared with consumers. These things becoming more expensive is where the conspiracy aspect comes in. It's also why a lot of conservatives are so against the idea of climate change. They see it as the govt. making a lot of things more expensive without justification (if man indeed does not affect the climate).
I think the real bottom line of that daily mail article that was posted is that climate change might be happening slower than we previously thought. This is good news. To me it means that we have more time to act, but we shouldn't start thinking this means we don't need to worry about it anymore. All of you guys believing in haarp believe in chaos theory, right? How could you believe that haarp is capable of such changes but the collective consumption of humanity shitting all over the earth is not?
all the drama when all we are trying to do is converse.
Meteorologist all over the WORLD are saying that the storm was geoengineered.
1 week prior to the hurricane (that i didnt know was coming till last minute) i had noticed CRAZY gridding going on in the sky which lead me to think that "they are doin something up there" so within a week a hurricane comes up the coast and slams into jersey. and i saw with my own eyes those cocksuckers grid the sky to (what looked like)control the direction of the storm. they did this all over coastal maine week prior to storm. If you think the Rockefellers are going to let bar harbor get hit by a bad storm haha yea right them dudes got enough money to control anything they want.
for real tho i want to know why the fuck they are spraying nano particles like crazy in grids east to west right before the hurricane
are these nano particles antennae that can be controlled via satelite or navy program? my buddy in the navy says its part of an advanced radar defense system but im not buying that shit... The whitehouse says its to curb global warming... so who the fuck is telling the truth??? what are these assholes spraying??? and what can we do to stop them
Food? Is that free too?
That guy is a scam artist, through and through.
He makes wild claims and will consistently fail to deliver. Then he will blame government for suppressing him while asking for more of your money. Science is too stupid to grasp his ideas, and the only people that can help the world are the special believers such as yourself who will open your heart and your wallet in the name of "real" progress. If this guy was for real wouldn't tptb have disappeared him a long time ago? Maybe had a ninja give him a freemason token and tell him he could hand over his tech or die?
Okay Hempcat your first statement the the Gov didn't creat global warming is so WRONG!!! lol..Bra how do you think Global Warming is started? It's started by OUR GOV allowing too many emmisions into the atmosphere through industry! Not changing the cars to electic not stopping the factories because they made so much money from them!
It's these emmisions that have put holes in the ozone layers hence the Global warming of this earth!
headband 707
Who did I call names? I have been posting in this thread a lot, so maybe I did and don't remember, but I don't think I've called anyone names. Conspiracy theorist, yeah, but I backed that up with a dictionary definition. I don't see that as being an inherently bad thing. We both know some conspiracy theories have been right over the years. Most of the evidence I've seen in this thread has been conjecture at best. That last video from trichrider started out promising until it ended with an angry preacher yelling at me about science he does not even understand. He shows a hole punch cloud and calls it a "haarp cloud."
even the Enquirer has true stories so what is your point?
oh!!! that explains your attitude. really now...
i'm not trying to dispute AGW. this was never about that...it is about weather manipulation. a fact i have tried to establish with nothing but misdirection and denial. yes i said it...denial.
Yeah and even a poor man has money but it doesn't mean he's rich.
Yes really. if someone says there is a group of people working together against everyone else then that is a conspiracy, correct? If someone believes this even though they have no real hard evidence just speculation and opinion then guess what that's a theory of a conspiracy. So to call this person a conspiracy theorist is not an insult, it's an accurate description. Apparently though you and others who have no problem calling everyone who disagrees with you sheeple and other clearly insulting or derogatory terms, seem to feel the label Conspiracy Theorist is insulting. How is it insulting? Are you not suggesting it's a conspiracy? That a group of people (aka TPTB) are working together against everyone else? Isn't it a theory since you have no hard factual evidence just the opinions of people with legitimate sounding titles posing as experts that have been demonstrated time and time again to be pushing nothing more then their belief of what is true? Then you pat yourself on the back and call yourselves a critical thinker simply because you believe you are right and everyone else is wrong.
Hmmm, free.
What is free?
First you must ask what is cost, or input.
Yes, the sun sends down energy. Scientifically it's not free, it took resources and a nuclear reaction. But ok for arguments sake, it didn't cost us anything to get it here.
Ok, now how do we harvest this "free" energy?
That brings me to earth, and it's inhabitants.
Mans labor!
The most important resource of all, for without our labor, only the plants would be harvesting the suns "free" energy.
Ahhh, but that poses a problem. If mans labor is needed to build the equipment, transport, design, maintain, advance etc who pays?
Nothing is free.
can you show me his invention working? and actually the best discussion I saw about it was on a conspiracy theorist website. I just have this b.s. alarm in my head that says "if something sounds too good to be true, it usually is." He wouldn't be the first free energy scammer. I will surely eat crow if he demonstrates the device working as advertised and allows other physicists to analyze the working machine. Until then I'm calling b.s. That is all.
can you show me his invention working? and actually the best discussion I saw about it was on a conspiracy theorist website. I just have this b.s. alarm in my head that says "if something sounds too good to be true, it usually is." He wouldn't be the first free energy scammer. I will surely eat crow if he demonstrates the device working as advertised and allows other physicists to analyze the working machine. Until then I'm calling b.s. That is all.