I
InvisibleEmpire
I would have never guessed
Speaking about Columbus Day threads, didn't they also use to think the world was flat?
You need to get some new 'peers'.![]()
Well, imho, I believe the dynamic that use to drive this type of thinking has long gone by the way-side.
It's nurture, not nature any longer.The 'traditional' hunter/gatherer roles no longer apply. When given free reign (including those personally imposed self-limitations) any individual can flourish, especially women.
Yep, I'm fucking sick of this socialist "everyone is identical and has the same potential" bullshit today. Why can't we accept and embrace the fact that people are different, and use this to our advantage?
So you think both sex's brains are identical? Both are capable of doing the exact same things exactly the same? You don't believe in an innate advantage for either sex in certain areas?
Personally, I think we're all a lot more different than we think we are...or will admit. If we spent half as much effort and energy USING our differences constructively instead of constantly fighting against nature and becoming mediocre...we'd be much better off.
We make everything so damn complicated and difficult.
Although your hypothsis is correct the plain fact is we have missed the boat completely when it comes to teaching our kids . It matters not if a female excels in math the only thing that truly matters is what he/she may excel in altogether period and nurture those talents.. We treat everyone like a drone and this should stop. School is very boring..peace out Headband707
Not what I said at all.
All things being equal, it matters not how the task at hand gets done.While the method used may differ, the same level of success is attainable by either.
Are there differences? ofcourse, but differences don't exactly equate to better/worse as a zero sum.
The fact is, times have changed, while the ideology of many have not.
Synergy, not seperation, is the answer I guess is what I'm getting at.That goes for whomever, be it man or woman, is best for the task at hand.
Why should people be pidgeon-holed?
And we teach boys wrong. Boys don't like sitting still and listening, they learn by doing.
But it DOES matter. Why send someone in to stumble around when someone else is a natural at it? In some things you WON'T get the same level of success. I know it's "not nice" to talk gender/race and smarts...so I'll go in another direction.
Women ARE more nurturing. Men ARE more aggressive. So we SHOULD be pigeon holed. We bring down the "system", we lower the standards too much, to give "everyone an equal chance"...even though, for some things, there shouldn't BE an equal chance.
I guess it's me...I'm tired of seeing the incompetence out there. I see "professionals" and I'm teaching THEM? Why? Because someone wanted in to that profession who couldn't meet the standards...so the standards were lowered so much that ANY idiot can "do it"...but really can't.
Times AND ideology have changed my friend...they've both changed. My "old fashioned" ideology of...you don't work in the garden, you don't eat...sure has changed.
There is no synergy in quotas...only negativity.
So are you saying this research is socialist? Or...? I don't get where your rage is coming from...
The science says females are equal to males in math ability. Nothing socialist or controversial here, unless (like I say in my original post) you bring assumptions about what gender roles should be to the table.
I live in a socialist state, the concept of equality and anonymity is very strong here, your kids are simply not allowed to be bad at math and exceptional in arts&craft. If your kids are, the doc will prescribe them ritalin, and if they don't improve, they have some sort of unknown disorder. If you're not average at everything, you're sick!