What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
  • ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest in October! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Feds Finally State Their Position On Guns And MMJ

Weezard

Hawaiian Inebriatti
Veteran
"unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana"

I see no problem here because;
1.
"congress shall make no law . . ."

And not just the second amendment.

The 10th amendment clearly states;
"
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

That says that State legal, IS legal!
So it is not a lie for a card holder to answer no.

And B.
Marijuana is simply not addictive.
One can not be addicted, so, it is not a lie to answer no to the second part.
I would therefore have no conflict of personal ethics filling out their silly form.:)

And no fear of perjury should my answer be challenged.

I presently have no need for a weapon, but will defend to the death your right to possess one.:tiphat:

Aloha,
Weeze
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top