Halleluja we now declared HPS light the same as the sun.
Keep on growing
Keep on growing
Halleluja we now declared HPS light the same as the sun.
Keep on growing
A) anyone here uses science to set the basis for trait selection.
B) Then tell me how plasticity, the norm of reaction or the basis of trait selection criteria don't matter or how they are irrelevant.
in fact refute this
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdeptcommercepub/477/
Wow 121 pages and still no resolution, all I have gotten out of this thread is that a handful of people think that their way is the only way and if you disagree or question it you are an ignorant pollen chucking hack. I also got that there are a lot of unprofessional professionals in this game, people that don't even have common courtesy or respect for other people or their opinions. I have said it before what does it matter how a person reaches their goal as long as they reach it. If they don't mind taking the scenic route than why should anyone else care. All of the talk that some are doing a disservice to cannabis because they don't adhere to certain ideals is ridiculous, how does one persons technique have any effect on what another breeder does or cannabis as a whole. If the end product is what it is supposed to be then that is all that matters.
Thank you canned that was a very good example of that cheap psychology 101 we touched on, and of course, it failed - mo betta you get used to and comfy/cozy with that scenario. We are NOT discussing one mans methods, we are discussing the known's of the science of plant breeding. Do you have anything to add in that regard?
What could I possibly have been thinking I guess since the omnipotent Tom Hill claims that it failed then it must have failed.
Wow 121 pages and still no resolution, all I have gotten out of this thread is that a handful of people think that their way is the only way and if you disagree or question it you are an ignorant pollen chucking hack. I also got that there are a lot of unprofessional professionals in this game, people that don't even have common courtesy or respect for other people or their opinions. I have said it before what does it matter how a person reaches their goal as long as they reach it. If they don't mind taking the scenic route than why should anyone else care. All of the talk that some are doing a disservice to cannabis because they don't adhere to certain ideals is ridiculous, how does one persons technique have any effect on what another breeder does or cannabis as a whole. If the end product is what it is supposed to be then that is all that matters.
Thank you canned that was a very good example of that cheap psychology 101 we touched on, and of course, it failed - mo betta you get used to and comfy/cozy with that scenario. We are NOT discussing one mans methods, we are discussing the known's of the science of plant breeding. Do you have anything to add in that regard?
What could I possibly have been thinking I guess since the omnipotent Tom Hill claims that it failed then it must have failed.
Thank you canned that was a very good example of that cheap psychology 101 we touched on, and of course, it failed - mo betta you get used to and comfy/cozy with that scenario. We are NOT discussing one mans methods, we are discussing the known's of the science of plant breeding. Do you have anything to add in that regard?
Also it doesn't appear to be much discussion going on, more like a bunch of rants and tirades and disdain for other ways of thinking. All of the swearing and insults are assanine, would you act that way to the person if you were face to face, I hope not and if you do you must live a nice area because there are places were people will shoot you for looking at them funny let alone talking shit and hurling insults. This internet toughguy douchebag persona sucks.
Damn Tom your good, you got me again, but what should I have expected from "The Omnipotent One". You got some more insults for me, I know you do, you are on fire today.Oh you'll get over it, I promise
WTF are you guys talking about... breeding for secondary metabolites?
from what I understand is, that, THCa when decarboxylated = delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol which when passed through the liver, either from what is left in the blood after an initial pass of the brain when smoked or following digestion when taken orally, is METABOLIZED into 11-hydroxy-tetrahydrocannabinol... THC's SECONDARY METABOLITE which is enzymatically converted by your liver not created by the plants... so...
as far as I know you cannot breed for secondary metabolites, LOL
Damn Tom your good, you got me again, but what should I have expected from "The Omnipotent One". You got some more insults for me, I know you do, you are on fire today.
This has become a big boy thread (thank you mods for allowing it to occur), you need to check your hippie-dippy feelings at the door dude, that is the price of admission. I have been accused of all kind of shit here for this and that, but here I am. If you can not handle it, then there's the fucking door, go and swim and frolic in your pool of denial. I will give 10:1 odds on whether or not your input will be missed.