What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

CO lawmakers plan crackdown on home pot growers

iBogart

Active member
Veteran
By Kristen Wyatt, The Associated Press
Hoping to preserve its marijuana law under the next president, Colorado is planning a slate of legislation designed to crack down on pot that is grown legally but then sold on the black market.
The goal is to cut down on complaints that Colorado’s liberal allowances for growing pot without a license has created a thriving network of illegal growers. Colorado allows medical pot patients to grow up to 99 plants, far beyond other marijuana states, and it also allows recreational users to group their allotted six plants into massive co-ops, entire greenhouses of pot that aren’t tracked or taxed.
Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper says the state’s generous pot allowances make it almost impossible for cops to tell legitimate growers from black-market fronts, and he is calling for a several new laws to crack down. Proposals include a ban on group recreational pot grows and new paperwork requirements for people who grow medical pot.
With uncertainty looming about how the next president will approach marijuana, Colorado regulators say it’s time to ramp up efforts to crush the black market and show the feds that Colorado isn’t letting weed seep into other states.


http://www.denverpost.com/2016/12/07/colorado-lawmakers-crackdown-home-marijuana-growers/
 

aridbud

automeister
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Was wondering what revisions would take place with new presidency, new atty gen, new cabinet members that preferred keeping cannabis a "state" issue.

99 plants is too much for ANY medical malady.
 

PDX Dopesmoker

Active member
Politicians are so hysterical, The people who are complaining about Colorado's supposed exports are the same people who say that Califonia's agricultural checkpoints at it's borders are illegal and violate interstate commerce laws. You'd think that Trump won a massive landslide victory the way politicans are bending over for "conservative" interests these days. Reminds me of all those Democrats who stood up to George Bush preventing the unnecessary and extraordinary wasteful war in Iraq. Nice to know you can trust your friends when push coms to shove.
usa-map.jpg
 

geneva_sativa

Well-known member
By Kristen Wyatt, The Associated Press
Hoping to preserve its marijuana law under the next president, Colorado is planning a slate of legislation designed to crack down on pot that is grown legally but then sold on the black market.
The goal is to cut down on complaints that Colorado’s liberal allowances for growing pot without a license has created a thriving network of illegal growers. Colorado allows medical pot patients to grow up to 99 plants, far beyond other marijuana states, and it also allows recreational users to group their allotted six plants into massive co-ops, entire greenhouses of pot that aren’t tracked or taxed.
Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper says the state’s generous pot allowances make it almost impossible for cops to tell legitimate growers from black-market fronts, and he is calling for a several new laws to crack down. Proposals include a ban on group recreational pot grows and new paperwork requirements for people who grow medical pot.
With uncertainty looming about how the next president will approach marijuana, Colorado regulators say it’s time to ramp up efforts to crush the black market and show the feds that Colorado isn’t letting weed seep into other states.


http://www.denverpost.com/2016/12/07/colorado-lawmakers-crackdown-home-marijuana-growers/

This probably has more to do with loss of Colorado tax revenue and pressure from licensed producers.
 

MJPassion

Observer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
What a bunch of gobbledy goop.

ANY LAW THAT VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTION IS VOID.
Maybury v Madison, US SUPREME COURT
 

MileHighGlass

Senior Member
This is about the stores losing money it has nothing to do with anything else at all.

The monopoly needs to up revenue even though the State Constitution says
"whatever is medically necessary"

To the person that said 99 plants is way to many, you sir don't know what they fuck you are talking about.
 

aridbud

automeister
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Lol at 99 plants being too much for medical


Denver Post UPDATED: <time class="updated" datetime="2016-10-02T21:58:18+00:00">October 2, 2016 </time>
<time class="updated" datetime="2016-10-02T21:58:18+00:00">
</time>
<time class="updated" datetime="2016-10-02T21:58:18+00:00"></time>.....Colorado, the state Medical Board on Tuesday suspended the licenses of four doctors for allegedly recommending excessive plant counts to more than 1,500 patients.
All of the recommendations involved approvals for patients to grow or possess at least 75 plants. The standard plant count for medical marijuana patients is six plants, and state health officials have long threatened to crack down on doctors who they believe recommend higher amounts without sufficient justification...




Bet you a nickel, _tessarecting, even though Colorado Senate Bill 15-014 was passed in 2016, it will be modified next session with changing of the guard. When unclear of recreational/medical plant counts, taxes not paid....statutes to be pro-tax will win out.

To the person that said 99 plants is way to many, you sir don't know what they fuck you are talking about.



Maybe I do and maybe I don't. Very few medical maladies (including caregivers growing) warrant 99 plants. Cancer, MS, migraines from info I've gathered. People easily exploit the system....and no oversight is shown...'twas my point, sir.

Why do all other MMJ states have a limit and no where NEAR the 99 plant count. Obsessive, just my opinion being a breeder, MMJ patient myself.


Guessing plant count may be revisited in state senate in 2017.





 

dank.frank

ef.yu.se.ka.e.em
ICMag Donor
Veteran
You say you are a breeder but are against 99 plants? Those two concepts don't even mesh.

Anyone serious about breeding should be pushing for a 2k plant limit. At least then you could sort a single seed line with some degree of scientific efficiency. 2k MINIMUM.



dank.Frank
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top