Switcher56
Comfortably numb!
It is going to be fun watching the next 4 years
Blatent election fraud thread
- Thread starter flylowgethigh
- Start date
- Status
It is going to be fun watching the next 4 years
Looks like we all get a whopping $600 bucks to recover the last 12 months. That wont even cover those that are behind in there rent for 1 month. They call this help lol.
Mrs.Berkster
Member
AWWA! So cute with your liberal media and the memes you post. I especially loving no facts. Courts can reserve their right not to hear a case. THAT IS NOT ON MERIT... check your facts when you claim losing. Love how you do not understand the judicial system. Merits are facts
Mrs.Berkster
Member
Justice Roberts SCREAMED that he is scared because of BLM riots... not constitutional. So sad or our country
Mrs.Berkster
Member
Do you need it?
Isn't it.. Its people like Trump that caused it. It will go down in history as the great con of the right.
Did Supreme Court Erupt in a Shouting Match Over Texas Voter Fraud Case? Fake news is fake news, no matter who repeats it.
- Published 17 December 2020
Image via Wikipedia
Claim
Chief Justice John Roberts screamed at the other U.S. Supreme Court justices to dismiss a Texas voter fraud case in December 2020.
Rating
FalseOrigin
On Dec. 17, 2020, a rumor started to circulate on social media that Chief Justice John Roberts had screamed at his U.S. Supreme Court colleagues while urging them to dismiss a lawsuit from Texas’ attorney general asking the court to block millions of votes that were cast in the 2020 election.
The rumor was often shared with comments accusing Roberts of “moral cowardice.” The conservative justice who was appointed by Republican President George W. Bush allegedly wanted to dismiss the lawsuit, the rumor claimed, because he was afraid of the “radical left” and the inevitable riots that would ensue if the court took up the case.
These rumors were bolstered by a video that showed a man describing a report he read online. The report was supposedly written by a Supreme Court staffer who allegedly overheard a loud argument “behind closed doors” as the Supreme Court debated the matter:
TEXAS ELECTORAL COLLEGE:
"The Justices went into a closed room…When Texas case was brought up he said he heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal Justices were insisting…afraid of what would happen if they did right thing…Moral cowardice" pic.twitter.com/JhnPN59wkP
— Howard Mortman (@HowardMortman) December 14, 2020
"The Justices went into a closed room…When Texas case was brought up he said he heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal Justices were insisting…afraid of what would happen if they did right thing…Moral cowardice" pic.twitter.com/JhnPN59wkP
— Howard Mortman (@HowardMortman) December 14, 2020
The story recounted in the above-displayed video does not originate with a Supreme Court staffer. Rather, this story is a rehashed version of a piece of misinformation that was originally published on far-right conspiracy theorist Hal Turner’s website.
On Dec. 12, HalTurnerRadio.com published an article titled, “Loud Arguments in US Supreme Court Chambers over Texas Lawsuit – COURT INTIMIDATED.” It was supposedly based on a “source deep inside the US Supreme Court.”
Hal, as you know I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS. Today was like nothing we have ever seen. The justices are arguing loudly behind closed doors.
The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard.
Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall.
They met in person, because they didn’t trust telephonic meeting as secure.
Chief Justice Roberts was screaming
“Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?”
This account can be dismissed for one simple reason: The Supreme Court did not meet in a “closed and seal room, as is standard” to discuss this case. The Supreme Court has not met in person for months due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard.
Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall.
They met in person, because they didn’t trust telephonic meeting as secure.
Chief Justice Roberts was screaming
“Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?”
The Supreme Court writes on its website:
The Court will hear all oral arguments scheduled for the November and December sessions by telephone conference. In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the Justices and counsel will all participate remotely. The oral arguments are scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. On days when more than one case will be heard, there will be a three minute pause before the second case begins.
While articles published to Turner’s website should be viewed with a hefty dose of skepticism due to the proprietor’s long history of spreading misinformation, many people encountered this particular piece of misinformation in the more official-looking setting of the viral video.
The video was taken on Dec. 14 and shows a meeting of Texas electors before they cast their ballots in the 2020 election. The man in the video identified himself as Matt Patrick from Texas’ 32nd district. In the full video (shown below), Patrick notes that he doesn’t have a citation for his story (he notes that it was something he read online that morning) and offers no additional details about this alleged screaming match. It appears that Patrick was merely rehashing a piece of misinformation that was published on a conspiracy theorist’s website.
Here’s the full video of Patrick’s remarks:
The anecdote about a loud shouting match being overheard as the Supreme Court discussed Texas’ lawsuit is a work of fiction. In reality, the Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit for “lack of standing.”
The Texas Tribune reported:
Briskly rejecting a long-shot but high-stakes case, the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday tossed out the Texas lawsuit that had become a vehicle for Republicans across the country to contest President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.
In a few brief sentences, the high court said it would not consider the case for procedural reasons, because Texas lacked standing to bring it.
“Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections,” the court wrote in an unsigned ruling Friday evening.
In a few brief sentences, the high court said it would not consider the case for procedural reasons, because Texas lacked standing to bring it.
“Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections,” the court wrote in an unsigned ruling Friday evening.
- Published 17 December 2020
- By
- Filed Under
Absolem
Active member
Mrs. B. You said the cases being thrown out weren't based on "merit". That's also the latest right wing talking point on the cases being tossed. You need to end the feed bag on OAN and Newsmax.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...rt-says-claims-have-no-merit/?sh=62def4493715
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit threw out the case in a scathing 3-0 ruling, saying the Trump campaign “had to plead plausible facts, not just conclusory allegations” and “do more than just allege conclusions” for their case to succeed.
“The Campaign cannot win this lawsuit,” the court noted in its opinion, saying that the campaign’s legal arguments are weak and “cannot succeed.”
The court emphasized that the Trump campaign did not actually allege fraud or provide any evidence of voter fraud in the lawsuit—despite the Trump campaign’s allegations of voter fraud outside of court—and noted “there is no clear evidence of massive absentee-ballot fraud or forgery.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...rt-says-claims-have-no-merit/?sh=62def4493715
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit threw out the case in a scathing 3-0 ruling, saying the Trump campaign “had to plead plausible facts, not just conclusory allegations” and “do more than just allege conclusions” for their case to succeed.
“The Campaign cannot win this lawsuit,” the court noted in its opinion, saying that the campaign’s legal arguments are weak and “cannot succeed.”
The court emphasized that the Trump campaign did not actually allege fraud or provide any evidence of voter fraud in the lawsuit—despite the Trump campaign’s allegations of voter fraud outside of court—and noted “there is no clear evidence of massive absentee-ballot fraud or forgery.”
Mrs.Berkster
Member
Nobody is sqwaking...Just flat out bribery and fraud. So much more than what you are spelunking of
January 6 is the big STOP THE STEAL rally in washington dc.....supposed to be wild...
Could even spark off the next revolutionary war
No shortage of pissed off patriots that feel disenfranchised...dont forget your musket
Mrs.Berkster
Member
January 6 is the big stop the steal rally in washington dc.....supposed to be wild...
Could even spark off the next revolutionary war
No shortage of pissed off patriots that feel disenfranchised...dont forget your musket
But we will only have two weeks to get it done.
Viva la revolution!!
Mrs.Berkster
Member
Apparently, And not being mean but you do not understand Merit. Nor do you understand when the Grand Justice states that he is more concerned about riots than our CONSTITUTION! Our Republic has failed the people
Absolem
Active member
You never post links to what the hell you are talking about. Have fun turbo posting tonight. Babble away.
January 6 is the big STOP THE STEAL rally in washington dc.....supposed to be wild...
Could even spark off the next revolutionary war
No shortage of pissed off patriots that feel disenfranchised...dont forget your musket
They're running the Special Olympics early this year.
- Status
