ItsAllOver
Devil's Advocate
NICE! This thread has exploded my possibilties. I am going to read these books!
Peace
Peace
I'm just guessing but I think hollow stems would take away from the plant. Plants transport nutrients and water through pathways, plant veins if you will. These pathways exist in the solid part of the stem. The hollow portion is just a false hope. You have a huge stem and think that means more water/nutrients moving at once, a super highway to you buds! But if half the stem diameter is hollow there is no pathway just empty space. A solid stem would contain twice the path ways and twice the metabolic potential.
However a hollow stem would be lighter which aides in structural integrity of the plant in the wild. In an indoor environment you can just tie a string and hang it up.
Xero000,
My guess is you haven't trimmed or smoked much weed. The stems may not be truly hollow but after they are cut, dried, and cured that middle pulp dries out and yeah, you could make drinking straws out of some of my branches. I've noticed hollow stems on many nice colas/
Peace,
Xero000,
My guess is you haven't trimmed or smoked much weed. The stems may not be truly hollow but after they are cut, dried, and cured that middle pulp dries out and yeah, you could make drinking straws out of some of my branches. I've noticed hollow stems on many nice colas/
Peace,
HS - you came close to understanding my point, but couldn't resist donning the mask of elitism. In any case, it is anatomically and factually inaccurate to refer to the soft pith in herbaceous dicots as "hollow." And that soft inner pith is present in all such plants.
I takes neither a wealth of experience trimming, smoking or growing cannabis, nor a bachelors degree in environmental science with a specialty in plant resources to understand that when the plant is alive and growing while that space is soft and light-weight - it most certainly is not hollow. That the pith can be dried out and removed after cutting is not really relevant to the biology of the plant.
Anyway, while it may seem counter-intuitive at first the mass of a plant is better supported in individuals with a wider diameter pith because the net mass of vascular bundles that provide support are then arranged in a larger diameter tube around said light-weight pith. As far as geometric structures go, a tube is much stronger and more rigid than a rod of the same mass. This strength naturally increases with diameter.
P, L, R
Thanks for your explanation Xero000
The Ethiopian Male I recently trimmed back and placed back in a vegetative state did indeed have a hollow central stalk. There was no solid pith mass but, could have been used as a straw without modification.
My two previous plants, (Master Kush x Skunk) had a large fibrous pith mass.
That is a rather interesting example Owl. I would wager that what you are seeing is an environmental response (pith autolysis) rather than a specific genetic trait.
PA was originally thought to be a symptom of disease or other deficiency, but more recent research has indicated that it can be a normal response to environmental changes. In this case the plant is consuming it's pith to fulfill the plants increased carbon requirement during flowering and/or re-veg.
I'm still curious enough to ask a few questions that you may or may not be able to answer depending on your environment and sample size:
Do you observe this trait in other individuals of the same species/geno. Did you observe this trait before re-veg? Before flowering? Since expressing the trait Does this or other individuals with this trait seem more temperature sensitive than others from the same species?
Cheers.