Ok..the 2 400s sound like they will give greater light coverage..and in all will be around 100,000 lumens. So should get larger yield vs the 90,000 from 600?
Thanx for input guys
cool that shooter off and you can do whatever you want with it,i'm about to start a organic tier'd garden ,2 POUNDS,lemme type that again 2 POUNDS!!!!! every 8 wks off 1 6shooter,what do ya know about that?!?!?
cool that shooter off and you can do whatever you want with it,i'm about to start a organic tier'd garden ,2 POUNDS,lemme type that again 2 POUNDS!!!!! every 8 wks off 1 6shooter,what do ya know about that?!?!?
hoe the hell do you cool s 36x36 inch cab with dual 600's. I was pumping 72f air threw a cool tube with a 400 watt hps with a 6"vortex pulling threw and I could not keep temps under 80. Are u exhausting outside?600's all the way. Your gonna have more heat with the 2 400's and you just get better coverage, not penetration. I much prefer 600's to 400's. Just because lumens is equal does not mean you'll get the same large density nugs that a high penetration bulb(600w or 1kw) give. To me they arent too much warmer then a 400w, but you should still consider moving up to air cooled hoods.
I learned my lesson when I was running 150w+70whps and 150w CMH in vert setup. Buds didnt compare to when i moved up to a 250w and I was using less wattage. Like i said coverage and penetration are not the same. You can have a fat weiner thats just doesnt go deep enough to hit that spot. Or, you can have the fat, long weiner and get it where it needs to be haha...
If you buy a 600 and decide to go dual, at least you have 1200w vs 800w, thats like an extra 400w with less heat, wires, duct etc.
Currently, I use 600w in a 36''x36'' and intend to go dual 600w in the future.