Originally Posted by Douglas.Curtis
I've read cannabis forums for almost 2 decades now. The biggest problems I see here have been very common over the years.
1. Brand new account with an agenda
2. Zero dialogue between the account creator and the company they have an issue with
3. Word of mouth information only (sorry, two charts and a quote is not evidence of anything)
4. Not even a shred of anecdotal evidence
This could be the first time the accuser was correct. Past history has shown these things to be mistakes or pure slander. I'm hoping it's just a big mistake. Good luck!
Why would you want anecdotal evidence more than independent 3rd party analytical data as proof? What I posted wasn't "two charts and a quote" to those who know how to read what I posted.
How about this for anecdotal evidence?
Chemical specs seem very similar.
.Viscosity SDS specs for density is 0.858 g/cm3 at 25 °C, boiling point is 285 °C (25 mmHg), flash point is 110 °C
.Mineral oil USP specs for destiny is 0.846 to 0.86 mg/cm3 at 25 °C, boiling point is 218 - 800 °C (760 mmHg), flash point is >93.33 °C. (CAS 8012-95-1)
.Both Viscosity and mineral oil have the very same Aspiration Hazard of "1" and Signal Word of "Danger".
I also realized I mistakenly wrote the first lab found both mineral oil and isoparaffin. Instead, the mineral is
some type of isoparaffin, which is a mixture of hydrocarbons (mineral oils) derived from petroleum.
I've written it a few times: for those who doubt just do the test yourself. Unless you won't believe your lying eyes
The image below is the toxicity data for inhaling mineral oil.