Punxsutawney Phil and I will be in PA the next day. Come join us for the Sunrise Service. There are still watermarks to decipher.
View Image
Don't give up hope. Hope for something better.
I’ll wait for tantrum day. February 2nd.
Punxsutawney Phil and I will be in PA the next day. Come join us for the Sunrise Service. There are still watermarks to decipher.
View Image
Don't give up hope. Hope for something better.
That’s okay.
But imagine the w.h.o. and cdc are now saying what several here were saying a year ago,,, the numbers are cooked,,, the pcr tests are cycled up so high rendering false positives,,, and they will now turn tbe cycles down, just in time for the new administration,,,
and lets watch and see how the boot lickers and resident virus experts aka glorified pollen chuckers,, rush in to say bidens mask mandate was the magic that turned the tide, LOL
I started this thread in the hope of shedding some light on the reasons that people are prone to believe in conspiracy theory. I have read about a couple of theories that you have posted, one of them quite deeply. Unfortunately looking at them in any depth involves a huge amount of time, and frankly one of the hallmarks of belief in conspiracy, means that they are virtually impossible to disprove to someone who believes in them. The thing is that sometimes conspiracy theories are true (see below article)! I just take the view that of all the theories I've read about over the years, nearly all are likely untrue. The particular one that you are presenting may be true, but I am likely to look at the most obvious explanation first, before considering conspiracy.- Interesting video's - truth or a conspiracy theory? - I'll leave that for you to determine -
-* ask 100 people if they believe in The official Warren Commission Report on the John F. Kennedy assassination - and at least half or more would probably say that they don't believe it -
When I went to college I lived in an 8 plex apartment. One of the girls above me my buddy dated. Her grandfather was on the Warren Commission. My buddy and I asked her a lot about it.
I used to have a copy.
I suggest reading it.
Mad Magazine is better edited.
It's like a scrap book of disparate facts.
The fact after all these years not one person has come forward with anything that would change the official narrative more then backs up the report for myself.
Jim Garrison, District Attorney - do you think he was lying ? or serving a political interest, other than figuring out what actually happened ?
I need more then one individual to change my mind on the official narrative. You should look up Garrison. He's pretty shady and people like him know how to make a name for themselves and sell books. Lin Wood comes to mind as well.
Problem is that any that go against the official narrative are deemed shady. There are a lot more than one. JFK's murder is well-documented, and not just by wackos.
It speaks to the problem of censorship, since that removes the platform for dissent from official narratives.
In fairness, you did say "not one person".
Correct. "Not one person" has delivered the goods to break open the case with definitive proof the official narrative was wrong. It's not going against the official narrative that is a big deal it's the fact that they have nothing to back up their claims. It has nothing to do with censorship as it has to do with providing evidence that could withstand the scrutiny needed to change the narrative.