What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Two killed in botched robbery of marijuana grow in California

RetroGrow

Active member
Veteran
I dont think it's illegal for california prop215 patients to have kids. And in this particular case , why would CPS take the kids from the victims? For getting robbed? That can happen to anyone.


No, for putting children in a potentially dangerous situation, while breaking the law. Of course, it's not illegal for patients to have kids. I know in my state, the kids would definitely be taken. May be different in Cali.
Brief search brought up conflicting viewpoints, although this case had nothing to do with over the limit, guns, shootouts, etc.:
Parents losing custody for medical-marijuana use:
"During a telephone conversation with her husband, Wendy Jones heard a loud bang through the receiver right before the call went dead. On her way back from a work trip to Anaheim in early 2012, she’d called her husband Mark to say she was less than an hour away from their East San Diego County apartment.

After several failed attempts to call him back, she arrived home to find their apartment ransacked. Mark and their 6-year-old son John were gone. She frantically dialed 911 and described to the dispatcher what looked like the scene of a burglary.

Then Wendy saw a business card of a county social worker lying on a table. Ending the emergency call, she dialed the number on the card. A social worker picked up and told her that San Diego County Child Welfare Services had removed her son and placed him at the Polinsky Children’s Center in Kearny Mesa. The social worker refused to provide additional information.

Only later would Wendy learn that San Diego police officers had held her husband and child at gunpoint for an hour while they searched the home. Despite Mark having a government-issued medical-cannabis identification card, police arrested him for possession of 10 pounds of marijuana and called Child Welfare Services to remove the Joneses’ son.

To this day, Mark is fighting charges of child endangerment for the bags of cannabis he kept in a closet. Both sides dispute whether the closet was locked. The child tested negative for any drugs and told social workers he’d never seen anything resembling cannabis.

(CityBeat agreed to a request by the family’s lawyer, Lance Rogers, to withhold their true names to protect the minor.)

This situation may be more common than many people realize. Regardless of criminal charges against a parent, a child’s custody is determined by a judge in Juvenile Dependency Court. In many cases, parents have their child removed without facing any charges.

Since 2011, San Diego County Child Welfare Services has taken custody of children, based on the presence of medical cannabis in a home, from at least five families, according to information available to CityBeat by press time. In all cases, the parents say, social workers pressured them into discontinuing their use of medical cannabis in exchange for the return of their children.

While county officials would not provide the total number of cases in which children were removed from their homes as a result of parents using medical cannabis, advocates have increasingly voiced concerns about such situations.

Based on the number of people who seek legal advice from local advocacy organization Americans for Safe Access, San Diego Chapter President Eugene Davidovich estimated there have been at least 35 cases during the last three years.

“I think that number’s a conservative estimate,” he said. “It comes up constantly. Every month, someone comes to a meeting that tells us about it but doesn’t want to go public.”

Child Welfare Services maintains that in all cases, it establishes abuse or neglect in connection with the medical-cannabis use. The county’s policy states: “Medical Marijuana cases are to be treated the same as cases that have alcohol as the primary substance of choice when it comes to abuse or addiction. The [Child Welfare Services social worker] must be able to document the impact of the Marijuana use on the child(ren) in the case where its use is an issue.”

Children are not removed based solely on the use of medical cannabis, said Connie Cain, spokesperson for Child Welfare Services. “If a parent is using medical marijuana, and they’re using as authorized, and there is no negative impact on the child or children in the home, then that’s great.”

In order to determine harm, a social worker will interview a wide range of people who have regular contact with the family, such as teachers, neighbors and relatives, Cain said. “You really just have to look at all the indicators around,” she said. “You have to look at the big picture, talk to many different people.”

However, whether cannabis leads to harm in any particular situation is rarely challenged in court, said San Diego attorney Gerald Singleton, who specializes in child-custody cases.

This allows social workers to exploit their position, he said. “I don’t want to over-generalize because there are a lot of times social workers do follow the law, but in the times that people have come to me—medical marijuana patients—there has been absolutely no evidence of abuse or neglect.”

Parents overwhelmingly waive their legal rights and submit to monitoring in order to regain custody of their children, Singleton said. A child is often returned within weeks or months if a parent agrees to submit to regular drug testing and in-home inspections.

In recent months, Singleton has represented Michael Lewis, a Gulf War veteran and medical-cannabis patient who fought Child Welfare Services in court after a social worker removed his 2- and 4-year-old sons. Although a Superior Court judge upheld charges of neglect, a regional appeals court overturned the decision and returned custody to the father after nearly a year.

Lewis is now suing the county for violating his civil rights.

“It seems to me what happened here, and what has happened in some other instances, is that social workers were not interested in whether or not people were using medical marijuana legally,” Singleton said. “They went ahead and removed the children or threatened to remove the children as a way to force people to stop.”

The San Diego County Counsel’s office, which represents social workers in such legal cases, did not respond to CityBeat’s request for comment.

The Jones family has also filed a civil lawsuit against the county, alleging officials not only unlawfully detained their son, but also failed to protect him while in custody.

Believing their son had been physically and sexually abused by children at the Polinsky Children’s Center, they eagerly agreed to waive their rights to fight the case in Juvenile Court and submitted to monitoring.

Their son was returned after about a month, but at the facility an older boy forced the Joneses’ son to kiss, using tongues, among other acts, according to the family’s lawsuit, which also claims that Child Welfare Services officials tried to conceal the abuse. After that incident, the Joneses’ son was assaulted by another boy, the family alleges.

“It turns out, our client was at much greater danger at Polinsky than he would have been at home,” said Shawn McMillan, the attorney representing the Joneses in their lawsuit.

Child Welfare Services declined to comment.

Not everyone has experiences as traumatic as the Jones family claims to have had. However, San Diegans are not the only ones expressing concern that social workers treat medical-cannabis patients unfairly. In recent years, several cases around the state have made headlines.

“There’s been pretty atrocious behavior in other parts of the state,” said Dale Gieringer, executive director for the California chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. “We get complaints about this all the time—kids being taken away, especially when people are growing [cannabis] at home. It’s one of the leading concerns that patients express to us.”

In a precedent-setting case, an appeals court decision in Los Angeles County ruled last year that child-welfare agencies must establish abuse of medical cannabis before removing a child from a home. In opposition to a lower court ruling, the appellate judge found that use of medical cannabis alone is not akin to substance abuse.

This case and others like it have prompted counties, such as San Diego, to change their protocol for dealing with medical-cannabis patients and their children, McMillan said.

“Up until recently,” he said, “it’s been [Child Welfare Services’] position that marijuana use is essentially illicit drug abuse, and the fact that you have a doctor’s recommendation doesn’t really matter— your children are in danger because you’re essentially an unlawful drug abuser.”

While some social workers have started coming around to the idea that cannabis has legitimate uses, many continue to struggle with the idea, McMillan added. “There’s a big difference between drug use and drug abuse, and Child Welfare Services is having a problem emotionally drawing that distinction. It’s really a systemic problem on their side.”

Cain, of San Diego County Child Welfare Services, denies that medical-cannabis patients are targeted unfairly, arguing that the only goal is to protect children.

“Clearly, we don’t want to have any marijuana within reach of young children,” she said. “We look at different factors to determine—if it’s marijuana, if it’s alcohol, if it’s prescription drugs, whatever it is—we really look at that and determine if that particular use or abuse is negatively impacting the child and, therefore, making the child unsafe in the home.”

http://www.sdcitybeat.com/sandiego/...losing-custody-for-medical-marijuana-use.html

In the brief amount of reading I did, it seems that if you have money for attorneys, you can fight CPS and get your children back, but those cases did not involve amounts this large, or guns and shootouts.
 

Holdin'

Moon-grass farmer
Veteran
I'm glad to hear that the family was not harmed... and although I wish our world was a place in which I would never wish death upon a single human being, unfortunately it isn't. There's been people raiding another mans' 'castle' since the beginning of history... even in the animal kingdom, for fucks sake.

When those kids got the bright idea to pose as pigs and ambush this home, they put their own lives at risk. 'Growhouse' or not, anybody that invades your domicile to take something that isn't theirs takes the risk of losing life.

With that being said, it sounds like these folks have a loose ship, and goes as yet another reminder to us all to keep in mind who knows what you do and where you do it.

As for plant count, don't some counties in CA have 99 plant limits per Dr. rec? I don't know which counties specifically, but is it possible these folks were within their numbers?

Regardless, I don't think the homeowners are in as big of shit as it sounds, but I still wish the best for them.

On a rather grim note...

This reminds me of an incident here in the PNW that happened a short while back. To sum it up, a couple dudes tried to ransack a grower's spot. To their dismay, upon breaking and entering into this man's home, they were greeted with bullets, and either one or both of the intruders traded their life/lives for the chance at scoring some free herb.

Dude was over his count, max in WA is 45, can't remember his count, but from what I recall he was clearly over his numbers.

Local and state pigs/DA either dismissed or never brought charges... However, the feds caught wind and he was charged by the DOJ. Being as how we all know cannabis is still illegal as far as the feds are concerned, he was charged with not only growing cannabis, but also for the death(s) of the intruder(s), as well as gun charges... despite the guns being clean and legally possessed.

I'll see if I can find the story, as I may have forgotten or incorrectly recalled some details.

It's a sad, sad state of our world when a man will go to prison for growing plants and protecting his property and well-being.

Gets me fuming to no avail.

Be safe out there, everyone.
Found the story...

"A Puyallup, Washington, man who shot and killed two men who tried to snatch his marijuana stash from his garage is going to prison for seven years. ******* ********** was growing 200 plants in his garage loft when the intruders broke into his home on Dec. 6, 2012. According to the complaint against him, ********** was inside his residence with his son and heard the break-in. He went outside with his Glock 17 pistol and circled around the side of the house.

His own surveillance cameras showed ********** aiming and shooting through a window, striking one of the robbers. Evidence retrieved at the scene indicates ********** then went into the garage and continued to fire more than a dozen shots at the two men, killing both. While searching **********’s truck, police found additional marijuana as well as other weapons including a Bushmaster XM-15 assault rifle; an Intratec Tec-9 9mm pistol; a Benelli 12 gauge tactical shotgun; and a Professional Ordinance MDL Carbon 15.

On April 10, 2013, ********** was indicted by a federal grand jury and charged with manufacturing marijuana, carrying a firearm and possession of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime. For over a decade, ********** sold large quantities of marijuana, allowing a lifestyle that that included expensive real estate, high-powered ski boats, motorcycles, luxury vehicles, and other assets, according to the complaint. Under the terms of the plea agreement, ********** is forfeiting nearly $670,000 in proceeds from the sale of two properties — his Puyallup home and a second home in Kent, Washington. ********** is also forfeiting a 2008 Mercedes, a 2008 Toyota pickup truck and five firearms seized at the crime scene.

********** pleaded guilty to manufacturing marijuana and possession of a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime."

------------------------------------------------

Also found a similar story where the intruders were shot, but not killed. No state charges whatsoever, but the feds also picked it up. That dude got 32 months.
 

Superdankzz

New member
All us farmers are caught between a rock and a hard place. Yes we all want to protect against rippers but damn if the pig know we have guns on the property with live plants and all they most likely going charge us with gun cases.
 

griffonRus

Member
How fun to look at you, where marijuana is legal! As can be perfectly legal to protect their plantations by different methods! We will never see this! We prosecution begins with any number, the police are corrupt, the authorities profitable solder people vodka! Begins dementia, and most deaths and alcoholic moguls pay good tax coffers! can only look neater and smoking
 

RetroGrow

Active member
Veteran
Found the story...

"A Puyallup, Washington, man who shot and killed two men who tried to snatch his marijuana stash from his garage is going to prison for seven years. ******* ********** was growing 200 plants in his garage loft when the intruders broke into his home on Dec. 6, 2012. According to the complaint against him, ********** was inside his residence with his son and heard the break-in. He went outside with his Glock 17 pistol and circled around the side of the house.

His own surveillance cameras showed ********** aiming and shooting through a window, striking one of the robbers. Evidence retrieved at the scene indicates ********** then went into the garage and continued to fire more than a dozen shots at the two men, killing both. While searching **********’s truck, police found additional marijuana as well as other weapons including a Bushmaster XM-15 assault rifle; an Intratec Tec-9 9mm pistol; a Benelli 12 gauge tactical shotgun; and a Professional Ordinance MDL Carbon 15.

On April 10, 2013, ********** was indicted by a federal grand jury and charged with manufacturing marijuana, carrying a firearm and possession of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime. For over a decade, ********** sold large quantities of marijuana, allowing a lifestyle that that included expensive real estate, high-powered ski boats, motorcycles, luxury vehicles, and other assets, according to the complaint. Under the terms of the plea agreement, ********** is forfeiting nearly $670,000 in proceeds from the sale of two properties — his Puyallup home and a second home in Kent, Washington. ********** is also forfeiting a 2008 Mercedes, a 2008 Toyota pickup truck and five firearms seized at the crime scene.

********** pleaded guilty to manufacturing marijuana and possession of a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime."

------------------------------------------------

Also found a similar story where the intruders were shot, but not killed. No state charges whatsoever, but the feds also picked it up. That dude got 32 months.

Limit in Cali is 99, less depending on county. So they were over their limit, and had firearms and children in the house. This was not a medicinal grow. That's why I'm thinking Feds might pick it up. But how stupid were the rippers? They risked their lives for plants that may not have been worth anything if they were still veggin'. They wasted their lives and endangered others for herb they could have grown. Had to be tweekers.....
 

OvergrowDaWorld

$$ ALONE $$
Veteran
Plant counts under/over 99 dont matter if there large plants. I watched a dude on tv in Humbolt County, who had the legal papers and DR. recommendation, got every plant ripped out during transition phase in greenhouses cuz the plants were too big and the Sheriff didnt think he needed that much for head smoke. Dude said he was 1oo plants under the legal limit for 2 people who each had like 50 large plants apiece.

They found $3000 in a safe. 3 GRAND! Thats it! Piddly-Shit $. And they took everything.
The dude said he sold some hay and not his MMJ, which clearly had no harvestable flowers on them yet.
Cop didnt care. It was up to him to let this guy go but he wanted to hurt this man soooo bad that he CHOSE to cut it all down and figure it out later.

Every single COP will have to answer to God HImself, for all the harm they want to cause to Gods little children.
For all the hatefull judgement they have in their hypocritical, darkened hearts. They will pay the ultimate price with their souls, to burn in unquenchable fire for eternity. While us gentle, humble growers will be let into etrnity with open arms because our hearts are right.
Doesnt it just feel good to say that.
 

Sam_Skunkman

"RESIN BREEDER"
Moderator
Veteran
Frankly, I would feel more comfortable in a society where people did not find it acceptable to applaud the death of anyone. I have never yet seen a death I felt positive about, or that I could possibly describe as nice.
What an interesting signature given the content.

Where is that society? Does it exist?
While can I understand your lack of applause, but, how about if these guys made a mistake or just picked your house to invade?
Would you shoot and/or try and kill them?
They were armed and will be happy to torture or kill to get some cash or Cannabis from you and maybe they will just refuse to believe you do not have some more? Or have friends with more?
Any violent criminal deserves any thing that happens to them, they are the problem. I don't believe much in the death penalty by the state, but give them life.
Of course the person living in the home should have the right to shoot them, even if they grew pot, they are the victims, not the violent criminals trying to rob people.
As for no death you felt positive about, lets cut to the bone, so you are sorry Hitler killed his self? Or the other top Nazis that were killed? Not me, they deserved it. No doubt about their guilts.
I can think of lots more.
Victims, like maybe you seem to be, are part of the cause of bullies and crime, not stopping it younger and sooner, stopping the bullies and violent criminals, or they or many will all mature to little Hitlers, just what we need.

-SamS
 
Last edited:

KGB47

"It's just a flesh wound"
Veteran
1000 dollars says the rippers were gang members so I have ZERO sympathy for the dead punks. Gangbangers and rippers are like cockroaches, you have to step on them hard if you want to get rid of them.
 

Sforza

Member
Veteran
We are raising a generation of vigilantes.

I think you need to look up the definition of vigilante. Homeowners fighting off an armed home invasion are not vigilantes.

Who cares what Europeans think? Europe is a nice place to visit but I wouldn't want to live there.
 

morningdewd

Member
posing as law enforcement to rob growers and or dealers is an old well practiced method of operation. how does one defend themselves waking up at 3/4 am ,no weapon allowed in states where weed is legal,or maybe worse a weapon and trying to guess if your facing a thug or a real police operation.
 

Gry

Well-known member
Veteran
Sam, Linkage between a myself as a pacifist and Hitler ? Wow, really ?
 
Last edited:

MJBadger

Active member
Veteran
The two men were booked on charges of attempted murder, home invasion robbery, kidnapping, evading a police officer and committing a felony while armed,

Got some jail time coming me thinks .
 

Holdin'

Moon-grass farmer
Veteran
Limit in Cali is 99, less depending on county. So they were over their limit, and had firearms and children in the house. This was not a medicinal grow. That's why I'm thinking Feds might pick it up. But how stupid were the rippers? They risked their lives for plants that may not have been worth anything if they were still veggin'. They wasted their lives and endangered others for herb they could have grown. Had to be tweekers.....
Isn't it 99 per rec in some counties? That's irrelevant I suppose, because either way, feds have picked up cases in my state (WA, per the story I posted and others) whether they were medical or not, regardless of state charges, when gunshots are involved in self defense. Which it seems the state either never charged, or dismissed charges before the feds were even involved.

I'm with you, these folks in the OP story are likely fucked. They may get lucky, but I think the fact that the intruders were posing as DEA agents instantly will bring the feds attention... And with numbers like that, they should be expecting the worst, unfortunately.

I agree though, it's absolutely pathetic that they would risk their lives for such a task. You're right, most likely tweakers or junkies. Drug addictions do alter ones' thought process and perception of reality, but to be any bit capable of ripping/home invasion takes a piece of shit to begin with. No remorse for these scraps of garbage, only remorse for children involved.
 

paladin420

FACILITATOR
Veteran
Logic? CPS?

Logic? CPS?

I dont think it's illegal for california prop215 patients to have kids. And in this particular case , why would CPS take the kids from the victims? For getting robbed? That can happen to anyone.
expect no logic from CPS. They are just parasites protecting their jobs.
Google baby Bree. Cps took a 6 month old over the possibility of a home invasion here in Michigan.


Shoulda killed em all and buried em out back.
 

Gry

Well-known member
Veteran
The one who is ready to kill em all and bury em out back, not understand the concept of pacifism ?
pac·i·fism
the belief that any violence, including war, is unjustifiable under any circumstances, and that all disputes should be settled by peaceful means.
 

paladin420

FACILITATOR
Veteran
The one who is ready to kill em all and bury em out back, not understand the concept of pacifism ?
pac·i·fism
the belief that any violence, including war, is unjustifiable under any circumstances, and that all disputes should be settled by peaceful means.
Oh I understand pacifism.
I just know it's wrong.
Sheep believe wolves should not eat them. Don't stop a single wolf from dining on mutton... Minus the mint jelly of course
 

Gry

Well-known member
Veteran
So, it is ok to murder them all, and bury them out back, but Pacifism is wrong ?
 

RetroGrow

Active member
Veteran
I am wondering if the homeowners knew the "DEA agents" were fake, or if they were shooting at what they thought were DEA agents. I have no problem, either way. They are both criminal gangs, IMO. I am guessing they knew they were fake DEA agents by the way they spoke, using slang and gang terms, etc.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top