Ya ya, sounded like a changa jay story to me lol
Gorilla Glue #4
- Thread starter RB26
- Start date
- Status
I wondered where I might could get some of this herb..
B
BB420
my GG4 is vegging up nicely ready for mumming up how many days does every1 let her go in flower for ?
That Changa will do it for sure...
As far as I know - SSL's beans DID make it to the Bay - they just never got listed because Clarence needed more information regarding how he wanted them listed.
He hasn't been on to provide that information...apparently.
PF - big respect to you buddy for filling in the gap. You make a lot of growers very happy. Nothing but good vibes and blessing your way!
dank.Frank
He hasn't been on to provide that information...apparently.
PF - big respect to you buddy for filling in the gap. You make a lot of growers very happy. Nothing but good vibes and blessing your way!
dank.Frank
dutchmasters420
Active member
Guys how have s1s been so far for these babies? I will do some searching but figure you guys will fill me in.
lol. PF has been posting a bunch of pictures of the s1. read a few pages and see whats going on
Indeed I bet a gg4/changa jay would be the lip smackiest possible
I bet a gg4/changa jay would be the lip smackiest possible
I have used almost every established testing lab in the country, and I could really care less what the final number is. The only thing I care about is that my numbers are higher RELATIVE to everyone else's. If SCL is inflated, its inflated for everyone. The only reason I use them is because they are widely known, easily accessible, and give me awesome discounts. I am one of the few people who tests for potency, RST, terpenes, pesticides, and microbiological pathogens. I routinely go above and beyond to make sure what I am supplying is safe, consistent, and higher quality than the competition, all while being cheaper.
Summary: I don't give a shit if my test result of 86% is curved or if you respect SCL. If my results are curved, so are everyone else's. That doesn't change the fact that my results are more potent and cleaner than 99% of the competition.
Cheers
Lol. So testing is a competition for you, not for knowledge of what your producing and how you can improve? Guess accuracy doesn't matter in your case. Hey, i'll give you a discount too. Give me $30 and a gram of oil and i'll give you a colorful printout with fake numbers on it too.
What if they're just giving YOU high numbers, along with those discounts, because you're a good customer?
Im going to pop another GG#4 cross...
OHHHH SNAP!! Ken Father x Alpha Diesel - that's what's up.
Some rare ones those are!
dank.Frank
Some rare ones those are!
dank.Frank
4 hours of dry manicuring and we rang in at 29 zips of fire.
5 x 7-8 gallon soil bags 2k w cheapy hps in 6 inch blockbusters.
2 pounds of trim or so all together, ill let yas know how the bubble run goes.
Big ups guys, im covered in funk cant get this smell of me, louder than loud, shower dont help its still all over me
5 x 7-8 gallon soil bags 2k w cheapy hps in 6 inch blockbusters.
2 pounds of trim or so all together, ill let yas know how the bubble run goes.
Big ups guys, im covered in funk cant get this smell of me, louder than loud, shower dont help its still all over me
don't go into the hood smelling like that, you will get mugged4 hours of dry manicuring and we rang in at 29 zips of fire.
5 x 7-8 gallon soil bags 2k w cheapy hps in 6 inch blockbusters.
2 pounds of trim or so all together, ill let yas know how the bubble run goes.
Big ups guys, im covered in funk cant get this smell of me, louder than loud, shower dont help its still all over me
Every lab I know of uses HPLC for potency testing, so no, you're wrong. And yes, that includes Steep hill.
If you're hitting 17% for terpenes then you are the best concentrate maker in the history of the world according to both steep hill and SClabs, so maybe you should wonder about your tests. For reference most cannabis cup entries for concentrates are ~4% terpenes by weight. There is no such thing as a stable solid concentrate that is 30% terpenes by weight. That would very much be a liquid.
And yes, you can test 86% without doing dual solvent dewaxation processes. There are ways to reduce the amount of plant waxes in extracts.
Also you need more than an accurate d9 reading to judge potency unless you're talking about edibles. The d9 reading in concentrates simply judges how badly you ruin your extract with heat. Since thcA converts to d9 the second it hits heat, the number you're looking for to measure potency is combined thc.
And what if they are giving him high numbers because he's in the Illuminati conspiring with Monsanto in order to take over the world?
Or maybe he just grew some good shit...
When lab samples go back to get tested they are done by sample number, not by customer name. They are ran 150 at a time in the HPLC and graphs can be requested of the machine results. It would take a whole lot of time and effort to manipulate those results based on who the owner of the lab liked or disliked.
SClabs owner has a best friend from elementry school who owns a dispensary. I'm looking at his lab test numbers right now and they aren't any better than anyone else's. See for yourself.
https://weedmaps.com/dispensaries/california/santa-cruz/kindpeoples-collective?c=dispensaries
If anyone was going to get fake lab test numbers it'd be them. But they clearly are not. I think it's extremely unlikely that they are giving people off the street awesome fake tests but aren't giving it to the owner's best friend who buys way more tests.
These are just wacky conspiracy theories.
Yes you do.
Because the thc-a hasn't converted yet but it will when you add heat to it. So when you dab you aren't inhaling thc-a, you're inhaling the d9 thc that was in the extract along with the thc-a that just just converted to d9 when you applied heat to it.
Both are d9-thc when you inhale them. That's why you add those numbers together. Make sense?
- Status
