What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

are you a "conspiracy theorist"?

are you a "conspiracy theorist"?


  • Total voters
    104
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Stoner4Life

Medicinal Advocate
ICMag Donor
Veteran


completely delusional to think you embarrassed me in any way and I'm still waiting for proof (not speculation) for your side of the issue. I want to see/hear from a Snowden of the demolition crew that took down the towers; but it ain't ever gonna happen is it trichrider?

Also if there's proof it will come from ONE VIDEO not several hundred because there can be only ONE TRUE WAY the towers came down. They didn't come down by taking the best parts of best videos. SOMEBODY out there must have the one true story right???

Where's that story, THAT'S the one that's gonna rivet my fat fucking ass to the seat to watch it over n' over again :)

those 2 towers of power had SO MANY secrets and conspiracies amongst the filthy rich, the amount of dishonesty, corporate to govt & govt to corporate underhanded favors; but I don't care who tries to string them together into some sort of plot to take the towers down, I ain't buying it.......


high life 45:

your display of Time magazine issues is very telling, wtf it's actually telling I'll never know because I don't read that rag.

are you somehow claiming that the US is in denial of using agent orange???
if you are then you're about 1000% wrong making everything else you claim invalid.

 

lost in a sea

Lifer
Veteran
it's a good job cannabis lowers blood pressure because all the self induced stress by arguing over how aware or not we all are, or how afraid and in the dark we all are, in threads like this is a bit inconsequential..

there are no excuses for being lazy and afraid,, it's a dark energy sapping crutch either way..

Any murican that doesn't think amurica is the most poisoned insular penitentiary ever created needs to be reborn quick because you ask the rest of the human population and you will hear the contrary..

so dark and confused and stupid and run by psychopaths.. The ignorance will destroy the world,, they tripped you up and it wasn't hard, cold reality is coming like a concrete roman fasces..

this isn't aimed at you s4l,, just my musings on the modern coined term "conspiracy theorist" which has no meaning in any form apart from saying shut the fuck up..
 

high life 45

Seen your Member?
Veteran
S4L

I dont read that rag either, but theres a clear example that is out in the open. At least IMO..

I care and grow for a Vietnam Vet who suffers from Agent Orange poisoning and has cancer in his prostate, stomach, and lungs.

The US GOVT VA Hospital does not acknowledge his AO damage and has not any of the times my partner has been there with him.

However his civilian doctor saw it right away....

You can decide what you want with that info, but its something that I see and experience daily.

As for the towers, I dont know who or what did it, nor to I care to attribute it to a cult or NWO or whatever, but I dont think it was only from a plane.

Sorry if this has been touched before but what about this guy, William Rodriguez the WTC janitor who heard explosions before the plane hit amongst other things and he even tried to sue the government and Bush..." lawsuit Rodriguez v. Bush alleges that bombs were planted in the sub-basement and the Twin Towers brought down by controlled demolition"

He was reported on big time in Puerto Rico, he had the security keys and opened up the stairs for the Fire Department..


Then Larry silverstien building 7 which got "pulled" because of an uncontrollable fire, but how do you go about setting up explosives in a building with an "uncontrollable fire"

[youtubeif]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk[/youtubeif]

If you watch its collapse it looks alot like a controlled demolition, at least to me. I am not an expert in any way.

But these guys are...
http://www.ae911truth.org/


Watch their video, start at 4:20 minutes in and its starts getting to the point.
[youtubeif]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw[/youtubeif]


[youtubeif]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWorDrTC0Qg[/youtubeif]
WTC%20fish-eye.jpg


wtc7_collapse.jpg




What do you have to say about building 7?

Edit:I hope you dont take this as an attack. Im honestly curious about your point of view specifically about Building 7 and the Architects and Engineers views of it.
 

Kcar

There are FOUR lights!
Veteran
The simplest explanation is almost always the truth.
The JFK, the moon, 9/11, ISS, The Shuttle, The Holocaust.
All lies right?
 

bentom187

Active member
Veteran
FDNY Firefighter Meets Man Who Saved His Life on 9/11
[YOUTUBEIF]uQSOBu3HiJQ[/YOUTUBEIF]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQSOBu3HiJQ

Published on Sep 11, 2012


A while ago I was able to set up a meeting that I will remember for the rest of my life. A meeting between 9/11 hero William Rodriquez of http://william911.com/ and one of the many lives he saved on 9/11 FDNY firefighter John Schroeder. This is the first time they ever met and our cameras were there to capture this historic moment.
 

RetroGrow

Active member
Veteran
Notice they rolled out the official narrative of Bin Laden and his rebel terrorist organization Al Qaeda from the mountains of Afghanistan within minutes of the attacks. These guys were the definition of 1980's middle eastern terrorist portrayed in dozens of action films pumped out over the years by the Illuminati controlled Hollywood entertainment machine. So quickly every channel of the controlled media was buzzing with Bin Laden and the rebels responsible for the attacks. Predictive programming played a huge roll in the public swallowing the official story hook line and sinker.

Well, I can tell you that I was working in a clean room at a company at the time. There was a TV on and everyone was gathered around watching. No sound that I could hear. The instant I saw what was happening, I immediately thought "Bin Laden". I was the first person in the room to say it.
 

draztik

Well-known member
Veteran
You are so wrong. Open flame temps for kerosene are
around 1650F. Adiabatic (No loss) temps are way higher
at around 3500F.

Also, kerosene has a energy (heat) rating of 18,500btu per pound.
Each plane was carrying around 9000 to 10,000 gallons
or 54,000 to 70,000 lbs of fuel.

60,000lbs x 18,500btu= 1,110,000,000 BTU of heat.

More than enough to melt steel. What is amazing is that they stood as long as they did.
If what you wrote down about Kerosene was true everyone that ever burned kerosene in those little kerosene burners would have melted into a pool of molten metal. The temperatures your referencing would involve mixing pure liquid oxygen with kerosene which is what some rocket fuel is. But those conditions were not present on 9/11. Jet A (used in US only) or Jet A-1 is what is used around the world in jets and is Kerosene based with a open air burning temp of 500°F-599°.
"The flash point of kerosene is between 37 and 65 °C (100 and 150 °F), and its autoingnition temperature is 220 °C (428 °F)."

"Heat combustion of kerosene is similar to that of diesel; its lower heating value is 43.1 MJ/kg (around 18,500 Btu/lb), and its higher heating value is 46.2 MJ/kg."

You can see many videos on youtube of Kerosene fires in open air. Kerosene does not melt steel.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
The simplest explanation is almost always the truth.
The JFK, the moon, 9/11, ISS, The Shuttle, The Holocaust.
All lies right?

how simple is the official 911 story? why are there so many once in a million occurences that daym if it's supposed to be simple?

anyway jfk; yes deffiently, don't know what exactly happened but the 2 most recent whistle blowers involved back then make me doubt the official story.

not landing on the moon, is not a conspiracy theory i can accept, too many holes. i do believe that those guys went to the moon.

never heard about any theories about ISS or the Shuttle. while denying that the Germans killed millions is just plain stupid. we can all go visit the death camps and seethe footage of all the bones and all the skeletal people. trying to put people that believe 911 was not as we are told in the same category as people denying the holocaust is fucking really insulting. we have a historical record of those times from both sides.
 

Kcar

There are FOUR lights!
Veteran
If what you wrote down about Kerosene was true everyone that ever burned kerosene in those little kerosene burners would have melted into a pool of molten metal. The temperatures your referencing would involve mixing pure liquid oxygen with kerosene which is what some rocket fuel is. But those conditions were not present on 9/11. Jet A (used in US only) or Jet A-1 is what is used around the world in jets and is Kerosene based with a open air burning temp of 500°F-599°.
"The flash point of kerosene is between 37 and 65 °C (100 and 150 °F), and its autoingnition temperature is 220 °C (428 °F)."

"Heat combustion of kerosene is similar to that of diesel; its lower heating value is 43.1 MJ/kg (around 18,500 Btu/lb), and its higher heating value is 46.2 MJ/kg."

You can see many videos on youtube of Kerosene fires in open air. Kerosene does not melt steel.

No, you are wrong. And you are trying to distort facts to fit your theory.
All open air flames, from the flame on your bic lighter to a bunsen burner, to a log burning in the fireplace has an open air burn temp of around 1600 to 1800f.
And once you insulate it, and slow down it's heat losses, it goes up. Auto-ignition temps are just the temp it takes for it to START combusting. Then
the temp rises rapidly after that. 500 to 599f? Where did you get that? A oven gets that hot.
You can hold you hand in a 500f oven for a while without being burned. Not so with an open flame.
All this info is readily available for research, which leads me to believe that you are intentionally obfuscating to forward your own agenda.
 

Kcar

There are FOUR lights!
Veteran
Most steel has other metals added to tune its properties, like strength, corrosion resistance, or ease of fabrication. Steel is just the element iron that has been processed to control the amount of carbon. Iron, out of the ground, melts at around 1510 degrees C (2750°F). Steel often melts at around 1370 degrees C (2500°F).

Addendum (8/26/2011): I answered this question many years ago and it has been referenced in many different web sites and reports. There has been one misrepresentation that has come from that. Many sites refer to the difference in the melting point of steel and the burning temperature of jet fuel as proof that the World Trade Center could not have fallen from the aircraft fires. What those authors fail to note is that while steel melts at around 1,370°C (2500°F) it begins to lose its strength at a much lower temperature. The steel structure of the World Trade Center would not have to melt in order for the buildings to lose their structural integrity. Steel can be soft at 538°C (1,000°F) well below the burning temperature of jet fuel.
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
look at the night sky
the brightest star is where your eye will focus
that doesn't eliminate the other stars


thank you Payaso for allowing this much disclosure, and thank you to the contributers and willing visiters for your support and convictions.

having become emotionally involved, I am abdicating involvement and will watch from the side in hopes that this thread can continue without the bickering and discord.

simplest solution happens to be the hardest to believe.

:tiphat:good day friends.
 

Hermanthegerman

Know your rights
Veteran
Conspiracy theorist? No, the most simple solution is mostly the right!
Marylin killed herself, it was Oswald and yes, the Towers was hit by airlplanes.

:tiphat:
 

candidly

Member
The steel structure of the World Trade Center would not have to melt in order for the buildings to lose their structural integrity. Steel can be soft at 538°C (1,000°F) well below the burning temperature of jet fuel.

This is an example of how you can be completely correct in analyzing the details, but still miss the big picture.

Yes, I do believe that prolonged burning of kerosene can weaken steel enough to soften it and potentially cause it to collapse.

But the architect who designed the World Trade Center does not believe that burning jet fuel caused the WTC to collapse the way it did.

Why did the building fall so evenly and symmetrically? Wouldn't you expect that the fires would have been unevenly spread across all the support structures....thus causing the top of the building to start to 'tip over' and deform, as certain structural members were exposed to more heat and weakened faster than others....rather than it being just fine one minute, then suddenly and completely collapsing directly downward into its own footprint?

Also, what about Building 7?
 

GrinStick

Active member
BMJ investigation exposes Big Pharma as conspirator in WHO pandemic flu scam

Sunday, February 16, 2014 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: Big Pharma, World Health Organization, flu scam

(NaturalNews) The World Health Organization (WHO) is the subject of a new investigation aimed at uncovering what really took place during the 2009 global influenza pandemic, which led to tens of millions of people being vaccinated for so-called "swine flu." A joint investigation by the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ) has already uncovered major conflicts of interest at WHO, whereby vaccine companies profited heavily from the pandemic and the mass hysteria that it generated.

The investigation is focused specifically on the emergency advisory committee that was assigned to make official recommendations to WHO about how to plan for the pandemic, which was fraught with controversy from the start. Comprising this advisory panel were individuals highly connected to pharmaceutical companies, say BMJ and BIJ, many of whom had a vested financial interest in promoting antiviral drugs and influenza vaccines, which have been linked to causing narcolepsy and other disorders.

Big Pharma reportedly held a $4 billion stake in developing the swine flu vaccines that WHO would later push on the public through propaganda and fear. And the reason that WHO so readily accepted these drugs as viable responses to the pandemic is because its key advisors, many of whom are still unknown because they were intentionally kept secret, worked on behalf of the vaccine industry to see these drugs thrust into the limelight of the pandemic-planning process.

"Key scientists advising the World Health Organization on planning for an influenza pandemic had done paid work for pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were preparing," reads a report on the joint investigation. "These conflicts of interest have never been publicly disclosed by WHO, and WHO has dismissed inquiries into its handling of the A/H1N1 pandemic as 'conspiracy theories.'"

Flu pandemic hysteria led to governments purchasing huge stockpiles of drugs, vaccines that were never used
The ultimate goal, of course, was to convince as many governments around the world as possible to purchase large stockpiles of antiviral drugs like oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza), and vaccines like Pandemrix, to generate massive profits. Some of these drugs had never even been proven to work, let alone proven safe, and yet they were widely distributed as the emergency "cure" for H1N1.

Both oseltamivir and zanamivir have been around since the late 1990s, but the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other regulators really had to stretch the flimsy data that they received on the two drugs from their respective manufacturers in order to approve them. The FDA, it turns out, initially opposed recommending zanamivir, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline, during the pandemic, because the data on its safety and efficacy was severely lacking -- the agency later changed it's mind.

"After Dr [Michael] Elashoff's review (he had access to individual patient data and summary study reports) the FDA's advisory committee voted by 13 to 4 not to approve zanamivir on the grounds that it was no more effective than placebo when the patients were on other drugs such as paracetamol," adds the report. "Dr Elashoff's view was that zanamivir was no better than placebo -- and it had side effects."

The pandemic, as most people now know, ultimately turned out to be a complete flop. Many individuals ended up rejecting both the drugs and the vaccines that were being pushed on them by the government, which means that these taxpayer-purchased drugs and vaccines are now sitting unused and on the verge of expiration in warehouses all across the globe.

You can read a full report of the joint investigation by BMJ and BIJ into WHO corruption during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic by visiting:
http://engineeringevil.com.

Sources for this article include:

http://engineeringevil.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://science.naturalnews.com


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/043932_Bi...#ixzz2tnSL8X11
 

idiit

Active member
Veteran
Wolfgang Halbig has the perfect combination of expertise to evaluate what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School:

law enforcement: Florida State Trooper, US Customs Agent.
education: teacher, assistant principal, principal.
current school safety expert: trained key personnel at over 4,000 US school districts, and over 3,500 school safety officers.

His conclusion after ten months of motivated investigation:

“In my professional opinion, [Sandy Hook was] a scripted event… in planning for maybe two, two and a half years.”

law enforcement parked 1/4 mile away upon arrival. Why didn’t they rush to a heart-wrenching emergency if it really occurred?
no trauma helicopters were ordered. This is unheard of for an actual emergency.
no paramedics were allowed in the school. This is unheard of.
officials refuse to say who declared all 26 people dead. By law, this must come from a doctor. This refusal of so much basic information indicates lies and cover-ups.
official narrative claims emergency personnel didn’t find the school secretary and nurse after 4 hours of searching.
this “event” included a traffic sign lit with the message, “everyone must sign in.” Officials refuse any comment on this element that would be present for a staged event/drill.
porta potties were on site; again with no comment by officials and consistent with holding a staged event.
no names were listed for the 26 children and chorus director at the 2013 Super Bowl event in honor of Sandy Hook. The children resemble the alleged shooting victims. It’s unimaginable to not list these names for such a huge deal.
no lawsuits filed by parents for negligence against school district. This is unheard of.
a shooter with Aspergers would have poor motor skills and muscle tone – how did he carry all the gear and shoot with such precision? This combination is impossible to imagine.
2 homicide investigators threatened Mr. Halbig for making inquiries consistent with his professional duties to learn about this event for future school safety.
Newtown Public Schools won’t return any calls. Mr. Halbig says this non-cooperation to contribute information for other schools’ safety is unheard of.
the FBI classified the report on Sandy Hook. This has never been done before, and indicates a cover-up of all the evidence that this was a staged event.
radio transmissions are consistent in tone and content for a drill, not an actual emergency.
multiple weapons reported at a limited crime scene were never found. This is not credible.
law enforcement sent a kindergarten girl from the hall to stay at the crime scene of room 8 to be alone with dead bodies. This is a ridiculous claim that demands investigation and answers.
no parents viewed the bodies of their children. This is also unheard of.
no documents are being released via Freedom of Information Act requests. This is unheard of.
trauma services were never requested. This would never occur.
tearing down the school is consistent with destruction of evidence, given the HUGE gaps between official accounts and the evidence.
no bio-hazard company was contacted to clean blood, bodily fluids. This is impossible.
Mr. Halbig’s inquiries of who installed the school security system has been met with silence. This is unheard of to not get this information to improve other schools.
Mr. Halbig has the professional expertise to conclude the official story is impossible, and to demand arrests in order for the public to have the truth.

Sandy Hook is one of perhaps 100 areas of such importance. The 2014 Worldwide Wave of Action invites everyone’s participation to:

Expose 1% oligarchs in the US and elsewhere as OBVIOUS criminals centering in war, money, and media (also in ~100 other crucial areas).
Cause their surrender through arrests or Truth & Reconciliation.
Initiate true freedom for all Earth’s inhabitants to explore ready breakthroughs in economics (links here) and technology, and discover what it is to be human without psychopathic criminals who joke about killing millions, harming billions, and looting trillions.
There are suggested actions here for your consideration how you can lead/participate in your own best way.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014...-safety-expert-sandy-hook-shooting-fraud.html


let's wait until all witness and investigators are dead, all evidence destroyed and then call this another crackpot conspiracy theory. :)
 

candidly

Member
Minoru Yamasaki died in 1986.

Good catch. It was a different person who had that belief.

When interviewed in 1993, Lead WTC Structural Engineer John Skilling told The Seattle Times:
John_Skilling.png
Lead WTC Structural Engineer John Skilling was rightfully confident that neither the impact of a large passenger jet nor the ensuing office fires was capable of bringing down the Twin Towers “We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side… Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. [But] the building structure would still be there.”
I was going by memory when I posted that, and obviously remembered wrong. So you again got the small detail correct, but still missed the larger argument.

Not only were the towers designed to survive crashes of large jet aircraft, but they were designed to potentially survive multiple plane crashes. This assertion is supported by Frank A. Demartini, the on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, who said on January 25, 2001:
“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door—this intense grid—and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.”

http://www.ae911truth.org/news-sect...d-to-survive-the-impact-of-the-airplanes.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top