What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

any kiss users have exp. with veg+bloom

PetFlora

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I wonder whether adding more something (CaMg?) during the last few weeks would negate the extra N

Anybody?

I'll be interested to see how it works out for you. I've had excellent luck with the RO - it suits my water very well.

I think that there is a bit of a compromise at the end due to the one-part nature of V+B. Since there is no way to reduce the N, you can either leave a little growth on the table by starting the flush a little earlier than you otherwise could, or not have it flushed the way you like as a result of keeping the feed rate up longer in order to optimize the growth. For me, there isn't enough difference to worry about so I take the route of possibly losing a little weight. There are always ramifications from our choices, but for me the convenience of V+B outweighs the potential gain from being able to tailor various levels within the nutrient mix along the way.
 

jayjayfrank

Member
Veteran
you guys.... up the pH at the end of flower

N becomes less available at a higher ph, in coco i am doing 6.3-6.5pH for the last 2-3 weeks. at the begining of flower i am down around 5.8-6.

i run 3/3rd V+B for first 4 weeks - pH 5.8-6.0
then 2/3rd V+B & 1/3rd MOAB - week 5 - ph 6.3
then 1/3rd V+B and 2/3rd MOAB - week 6 - ph 6.5
then 3/3rd MOAB - week 7 -
week 8,9,10 tap water at 6.5 pH
 

rives

Inveterate Tinkerer
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Interesting approach. I recall Tom Hill saying something about upping the pH at the end, but I don't remember him explaining his reasoning.
 

RB26

Vendor
Veteran
I've heard upping the ph consistently throughout the veg and flower cycle is beneficial. I'm trying it out in my current run for the first time. My veg has had a ph of 5.5 - 5.8 and when I flip, I'll raise the average a little bit to 5.7 - 6.0.

From the 2LBs of V&B Dirty I experimented with, I decided that I will use this for my veg. I have opted against it for flowering due to the higher N (and I really like the offerings from MB Ferts for Bloom). Couldn't be happier with its performance from cutting throughout veg though. Definitely simple, PH solid (even the dirty), and cost effective.
 

Tropical Rain

Haze, Kush & Grey Goose
Veteran
Flowers often foxtail in high heat environment's (as well). I remember Dj Short had pictures of either Flo or Blueberry with foxtails. Honestly, I think they look kinda cool.

TR
 

Tropical Rain

Haze, Kush & Grey Goose
Veteran
you guys.... up the pH at the end of flower

N becomes less available at a higher ph, in coco i am doing 6.3-6.5pH for the last 2-3 weeks. at the begining of flower i am down around 5.8-6.

Exactly!

In the wild N is not reduced in flowering. The plant gets what it needs naturally right? Just a thought.

:tiphat:
TR
 

jayjayfrank

Member
Veteran
Exactly!

In the wild N is not reduced in flowering. The plant gets what it needs naturally right? Just a thought.

:tiphat:
TR

right, a nice clean creek or stream will have a slightly higher ph than 7, by the end of the season this can buffer the media to a higher ph than at the beginning.
 

slowandeasy

Active member
Veteran
you guys.... up the pH at the end of flower

N becomes less available at a higher ph, in coco i am doing 6.3-6.5pH for the last 2-3 weeks. at the begining of flower i am down around 5.8-6.

i run 3/3rd V+B for first 4 weeks - pH 5.8-6.0
then 2/3rd V+B & 1/3rd MOAB - week 5 - ph 6.3
then 1/3rd V+B and 2/3rd MOAB - week 6 - ph 6.5
then 3/3rd MOAB - week 7 -
week 8,9,10 tap water at 6.5 pH

Looks good, but 3 wks flush is a little long for me. How are the results? I up my pH near the end, but not that high. What measurement you using pf each? Tsp
 

PetFlora

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
Veteran

papaduc

Active member
Veteran
I think you fellas have got the wrong end of the stick on this one. The theory of running a higher ph during flower revolves around the fact it makes phosphorus more available, and that phosphorus is an important building block in the flowering process. That idea has been around for quite some time. I don't think nitrogen uptake will be affected at all by a ph of around 6.5. It's available through quite a large range of Ph.

If you want to reduce your nitrogen levels, before flush, just lower your ec.

There's a very knowledgeable old head you might have heard of, called Oldtimer1. He's the fella who created the guide for bonsai mothers, which someone referenced and I think has been made a sticky on this site.

He told me if there's anything you want to reduce before you flush with plain water, it's phosphorus. It makes the smoke much harsher, a blacker burn, and, most importantly, more carcinogenic. His advice was to reduce the phosphorus by using a weak dose veg feed at the end of flowering.

A small dose of nitrogen and micro nutes actually help the plant metabolise the stored P, so if you've got a veg formula which is low in P, feeding that at a small amount when the calyxes have fully set, will make a good pre-flush final feed. Some companies have final flush products based around this philosophy - including plant magic, who Oldtimer worked with to formulate some nutrients - which work around the delivery of very small amounts of macro elements and some micros.

I go by this method and it works for me to achieve a bright red burn and a clean ash. I don't need any more than that in my final product. All I use is my starter feed of formulex at a very low dose. It contains almost zero P at the amount I feed.

But, whatever school of thought you go by, the bottom line in my experience is you're not going to use up the stores of nutrients by feeding at the same levels through the ripening period and raising the ph. Once your buds are fully formed and the calyxes are stacked, you should be on a reduced feed while you wait for the trichs to turn.

In fact, if you go by what Oldtimer suggests, you are actually making P more available by staying on bloom feed and raising the ph in the final stages.

Some food for thought.
 

jayjayfrank

Member
Veteran
if i was using RO water my flush would probably be like 5 days- tap at 0.2EC and coco holds onto salts longer than anything else, atleast 15 days of flushing is required IME

IF I DID have RO water i would run MOAB until days before cut at really low ppm.

at the MAX i use 3/4 TEASPOON veg+bloom and MAX 3/4 TEASPOON MOAB

not a lot at all, my heaviest feeding indica doms never get more than 1.4EC

i have done nothing but put a tablespoon of v+b in a 5 gal bucket of water for the last 2 years and i have yet to meet anybody puffing on the same quality of smoke. case closed.
 

papaduc

Active member
Veteran
not a lot at all, my heaviest feeding indica doms never get more than 1.4EC

That's a crucial point. Where you start from obviously will determine how long you've got to flush your medium before it's excess is gotten rid of, and how long the plant takes to pale and use up it's remaining nutes. If you're at the right range, you should see yellowing within days of reducing your feed.

Cannabis tolerates a lot of abuse. It doesn't benefit as a result of high EC values, it usually does well in spite of them. 1.2ec is about as high as I will ever go with most strains. It's all they need. I'm sure I could go higher and that they'd tolerate it with no more damage than some tip burn, but the knock on effects it has on proper flushing and timing your harvest is significant in my experience.
 

jayjayfrank

Member
Veteran
while we are on the topic....

V+B is for "fast flowering oil producing plants" right right, but now old timer just got mentioned, who didnt grow anything that could be considered fast flowering, but he used a two part no?

running 100 day landraces with V+B is much trickier, any tips? thinking soil might be the answer...
 

jayjayfrank

Member
Veteran
right but some time that 'knock on effect' is a genentic requirement from the plant - see chemdawg needing more calmag than anything else in the stable. only line of genetics i have run into this.

and yes, i do take her ALL THE WAY up to the high EC of 1.4 - in week 3 of flowering

with veg+bloom no matter what you can feed them 1.0EC and its still a week before you notice plant stress, young-old-mothers-transplants, none of them 'yellow out' from a day of plain water(to me this says the solution is 'more complete' in proper feeding ratios)
 

papaduc

Active member
Veteran
who didnt grow anything that could be considered fast flowering

He bred smellyberry, which is a 8 week var, and worked with the original blueberry quite a bit.

none of them 'yellow out' from a day of plain water(to me this says the solution is 'more complete' in proper feeding ratios)

If you're feeding the right amount of nitrogen - the topic of conversation at the minute - then within days of removing it from your feed you should definitely notice yellowing.
 

jayjayfrank

Member
Veteran
but what is days? 5 days? cause in 5 days they start to yellow, in 2 days they look the same.

and am only famliar with Old Timers Haze, which i thought was all he was growing... the more you know. never really looked outside of icmag tho so. real hazes are not really suppose to take less than 12 weeks.
 

papaduc

Active member
Veteran
Sorry, I only just got what you were referring to before. When I said I don't usually go above 1.2, I'm not saying you are wrong to go to 1.4.... we're splitting hairs really. What I'm referring to is people pushing to 2.0 and above.
 
Top