What's new

High CBD strains, gotta have em!

A

AlterEgo860

ya I have a original haze x skunk clone. that must be high CBD. just because after 20 weeks of flower. and tried at clear.. cloudy .. cloudy and amber.. and just amber.. was just a very week stoned feeling.. more clear headed nice and calming effect.. great smell and taste.. but just no punch. I still have all my moms until I can get them lab tested because I will KICK MYSELF IN THE ASS.. if I toss a high cbd strain. I have 2 family members that would be so much worse off if it wasn't for a lot of my product. but I cant seem to find a lab that will test with no name no questions asked. I don't want to show any paperwork . I just want it tested.
 

homebrew420

Member
I am unconvinced that I, as a long time cannabis user, could tell if I was simply not high or I have used a high cbd variety. They just don't affect me in a noticeable way. One of the R4 showed intersex flowers so she is no more. The 2 left are small and will take a little bit to be of size for cuttings.

Peace
 
Lol.-- No clarification needed. I simply asked what % CBD is the Chem D!?
Re..

"Chem D for One is a Complete "Body" Stone/heavy Many agree
What % is that ?"

Is a similar Effect to 12.35% CBD Pre 98 Bubba Kush..
I'm not Saying Chem D is High.I know that is not the Case... Don't Believe I Did.Very Important......

SOO Many Contradictory Words... Again I Recieved this Data from Google.Now I see an Addition with (9%) Sensi Star and (12.35%) p98 bk in the Title (?!)

As I say ^
 
I see. Thanks for that specific additional info.

The problem with Bubba Kush is, most Bubba going around, in my experience is just someone slapping a label on an old world kush leaning strain. Therefore some dispensaries refuse buying any 'Bubba kush'.

According to a Bubba interview all Bubba cuts going around are fake because the plant went extinct after him. My investigation has led to a conclusion (and some may disagree) that Bubba was a BOG x kush region indica, or hybrid of kushes. Others say NLxKush, but that would match BOG having NL roots.

In any case, my point is, someone could have gotten a real Bubba, crossed it to a CBD strain and called it CBD pheno of Bubba. Someone could have crossed a fake/real Bubba which was a half hemp cross, line bred that, found a CBD pheno, and called it Bubba. Or it could be someone who's greedy who wants to keep the pedigree a secret, bred a CBD plant, called it Bubba before testing it, and that is what was published by the testing facility. It could be a plant with no relation to Bubba. Or a seed company could have hired shills to post desirable disinformation to get people to talk about a particular strain in their lineup. These things happen, and we know they do.

P98 Bubba is allegedly a clone-only, and it has frequently tested sub-1% CBD. So what exactly is this 12.35% CBD Bubba at 'The Clinic' in Denver? Who really knows. I'm sure it's a good plant but that doesn't make an entire strain a CBD strain. A clone of a clone of a high THC strain shouldn't ever cause a high CBD plant to appear, so either there was outcrossing, or there are fakes (THC plant can be fake, CBD plant can be fake, both can be fake). In other words, who really knows, and it's a long shot trying to acquire a high CBD plant from a 'name game' varietal.

As for Sensi Star, the original breeder tested before release and showed 20% THC 0.9% CBD, and in 7 cup placed finishes entered by Paradise, Sensi Star showed low CBD every single time. But then you have some independent reports of (low post count) people getting a 'weak' pheno or claiming high CBD test results (Rabbi [guest] on THCF, Scottybud on ICMag [4 posts], Neil Pollack on Sfinder saying: "Bought fromAttitude Seed Bank in Original Paradise Seed bank Packaging. Grew in 54 days. Weed looked awesome. Did not have any THC. Bunk bud. Do not buy from Attitude Seeds or PAradise Seeds. They sell second hand crap out of a bag of schwag. It is worthless at $15 US a seed. Even in Original Breeder packs, the Marijuana spent 3 months to grow was bunk, worthless. F ack off Paradise and Sensi Star. Canadian Strains are the best.") I don't see the numbers, I don't see the verified pedigree, I don't see the credibility of these random guests or low-post-count individuals who can be anybody. They are virtually anonymous.

I think much of all this noise can possibly be shills posting spam and competitors posting slams. Unless I see the figures I don't trust it. Unless the breeder MIXED pollen, CBD plant count ratios are in small whole number ratios like 1:2:1, or 1:1, or otherwise 100%. So when you have 99 out of 100 people saying the varietal is a potent THC strain (as is the case for Sensi Star-- a known potent high-THC strain) and you have one or two stray outlier posters saying it is a good CBD strain, then you have to question it and demand extraordinary evidence. It is still possible, that perhaps the CBD plants are simply being thrown out and under-reported. But barring that possibility, from a framework of simple Mendellian genetics without mutations, it is unlikely that you'll see CBD plants one in a hundred times or one in a thousand or ten thousand times unless the breeder mixed a whole lot of pollen to create seed stock, and one of the many many males being a CBD rich plant. It's possible but that makes it very undesirable to search for it as well.

On the other hand with R4, with Omrita RX3, with Otto #1, with Harlequin, we have quantitative tests that show CBD every single time.
 
A

AlterEgo860

grabbed a clone of dinafem diesel.. and n 8th to see how it came out.. and man.. this shit reminds me of a DEFF CHEMDAWG Cut.. im thinkin the Chem Dawg D cut .. .honestly seems like they just Selfed it.
 
S

SPG*

Your Genned up on the CBD thing CK :)
I was Relaying what I saw through Google is all... I've Actually been back their to try and get a link for you but cannot find.Did see Mention of SS and P98BK ..
Yours I think. ( again ^)





*
Special.Patrol.Group
 

jamminman

Member
I'm not apposed to a mutant cut, but when looking for a CBD plant it is all important to know out of the gate whether you need a cutting from the one you want or if you will be more sure with a pack of seeds. And even if it is a "known"cutting, it should be tested to verify. Accidents happen and mistakes are sometimes made, and yes there are those unscrupulous ones out there that figure you will never know the difference. You need to test every seedling anyway and to test a cutting is just ONE test, so it is worth the $ if you have to have CBD.
 
Is it true that you can test leaf samples from a plant in veg (grown from seed) and obtain an analysis of the CBD:THC profile that will retain throughout the plants life (only in higher percentages)?
 

jamminman

Member
That is the current standing to my knowledge. I was about to verify that but deputy dipshit made of with it just before I could. You can be sure that I am going to pres the "lab" for the test results at discovery.
 

TheCleanGame

Active member
Veteran
what % CBD is the Chem D!?
Dunno about anyone else's cut of Chem-D but I have Chem-D's Sister from a noteable member on here. I can tell you from experience that the answer to that is... not much.

I've tested harlequin twice now and I'm autistic. Both times I experienced noticeable, positive differences in the way my brain functioned.

I was unable to get high from harlequin...no matter how much I used.

Keep it Clean! :D
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top